The effects of platelet rich plasma on healing of full thickness burns in swine.

INTRODUCTION: Platelet rich plasma (PRP) is rich in growth factors and has been shown to improve healing in a variety of wounds. We determined the effects of PRP on healing and scarring in full thickness porcine burns with and without tangential excision and grafting (TEG). METHODS: Standardized full thickness 5cm by 5cm burns were created on each of the backs and flanks of 10 anesthetized female pigs (25kg) using a validated model. The burns were created with a heating device that emits heat at a temperature of 400°C for a period of 30s. The burns were randomized to one of six treatments: no TEG or PRP, no TEG+PRP, early (day 2) TEG and no PRP, early TEG+PRP, late (day 14) TEG and no PRP, and late TEG+PRP. Tangential excision was performed down to viable tissue and autografts were 0.2mm thick. When used, a thin layer of autologous PRP was applied below the graft. All wounds were then treated with a topical antibiotic ointment 3 times weekly for 42 days. Digital images and full thickness biopsies were taken at 9, 11, 14, 18, 21, 28, 35 and 42days after injury to determine percentage reepithelialization, scar depth, and scar contraction. Tissue sections were stained with H&E and viewed by a dermatopathologist masked to treatment assignment. RESULTS: There was no reduction in platelet and white blood cell concentrations in PRP and blood samples for the first 14days after-full thickness burns. A total of 120 burns were created on 10 animals evenly distributed between the six treatment groups. Burns undergoing early TEG reepithelialized fastest and with the thinnest scars followed by late TEG. Burns that did not undergo TEG had the slowest reepithelialization and greatest amount of scarring. Application of PRP had no additional effects on reepithelialization, scar depth, or scar contraction in any of the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of PRP had similar effects on reepithelialization and scarring of full thickness porcine burns as standard topical antibiotic ointment regardless of whether the burns underwent excision or grafting or the timing of excision and grafting.

Development of a contaminated ischemic porcine wound model and the evaluation of bromelain based enzymatic debridement.

OBJECTIVES: There are no well accepted animal models of chronic wounds, limiting advances in understanding and treatment of chronic ulcers. We developed a porcine wound model which combines multiple factors involved in chronic wounds to create a contaminated necrotic eschar and evaluated the debriding efficacy of a novel bromelain based enzymatic debriding agent (EscharEx). METHODS: Contaminated ischemic wounds were created on the flanks of domestic pigs by 'sandwiching' the skin between 2 'O' rings (1 placed on the surface of the skin and the other underneath the skin) for 24h prior to dermatomal excision of the necrotic eschar and its contamination with Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans. After confirming the development of infected eschars, additional animals were used to compare the effects of daily application of topical EscharEx or its hydrating vehicle on eschar debridement as a control. RESULTS: In all cases, application of the 'O' rings resulted in full thickness necrotic ecshars with invasive infections, which did not reepithelialize and sloughed off spontaneously within 14-21 days. All wounds reepithelialized within 28-42 days forming contracted scars. All EscharEx treated eschars were completely debrided within 7-9 days, while no debridement was evident in eschars treated with the control gel. CONCLUSIONS: Our model simulates the initial phase of chronic wounds characterized by a contaminated necrotic eschar allowing evaluation of wound debriding agents, and that a bromelain-based debriding agent completely debrides the contaminated necrotic eschars within one week in this model.

Optimal Timing for Early Excision in a Deep Partial Thickness Porcine Burn Model.

Many deep partial thickness burns require more than 3 weeks to heal resulting in disfiguring and dysfunctional scarring. Early excision of the eschar has been shown to improve outcomes in deep burns; however, the optimal timing of the excision remains controversial. We compared wound healing and scarring of deep partial thickness burns that were excised at different time points in a porcine model. Deep partial thickness burns (2.5 by 2.5 cm each) were created on the backs of six anesthetized pigs using a previously validated model. The burns were randomly assigned to excision at days 2, 4, or 7 using an electric dermatome. Full thickness 4-mm punch biopsies were obtained at several time points for determination of re-epithelialization and at day 28 for determination of scar depth. Digital imaging was used to calculate percentage wound contraction at day 28. There were no statistically significant differences in wound re-epithelialization at any of the studied time points. Scar depth and percentage wound contraction were also similar among the wounds excised at 2, 4, and 7 days (4.4 ± 1.1 mm vs 3.9 ± 1.1 mm vs 4.1 ± 1.2 mm and 52.9 ± 17.9% vs 52.6 ± 15.6% vs 52.5 ± 13.8%, respectively). Timing of eschar excision (at 2, 4, or 7 days) does not affect the rates of re-epithelialization and scarring in a deep partial thickness porcine burn model. Timing of eschar excision may not change outcomes if performed within the first 2 to 7 days after injury.

Early versus Delayed Excision and Grafting of Full-Thickness Burns in a Porcine Model: A Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND: The standard of care for full-thickness burns is tangential excision followed by skin autografting; however, the timing of excision and grafting is subject to debate. The authors compared early (2 days) versus delayed (14 days) excision and grafting in a porcine full-thickness burn model. METHODS: Full-thickness burns (n = 12) were created on the backs of two anesthetized pigs and assigned randomly to no excision, tangential excision followed by skin autografting 2 days after injury, or tangential excision followed by skin autografting 14 days after injury. Digital images and full-thickness biopsy specimens were taken at 16, 21, 28, and 42 days after injury to determine percentage reepithelialization and scar depth. RESULTS: At day 16, all burns that were excised early were completely reepithelialized, whereas only eight of 11 nonexcised burns (72.7 percent) were reepithelialized (p = 0.02). By day 21, all burns were completely reepithelialized. Scar thickness was greatest at 42 days in nonexcised burns (7.5 ± 2.1 mm); scars were thinner after early excision than after late excision (2.2 ± 1.8 mm versus 4.0 ± 1.1 mm; p < 0.001, analysis of variance). Wounds treated with early or late tangential excision followed by skin autografting were flat and minimally contracted, whereas all nonexcised burns were red, contracted, and slightly raised. Scar contraction at 28 and 42 days was greatest in nonexcised control wounds compared with early and late excised wounds. CONCLUSIONS: Both early and late excision followed by autografting reduce scarring in a full-thickness porcine burn model. However, early excision (2 days after injury) reduces scar thickness to a greater extent than later (after 14 days) excision.

Effects of burn location and investigator on burn depth in a porcine model.

INTRODUCTION: In order to be useful, animal models should be reproducible and consistent regardless of sampling bias, investigator creating burn, and burn location. We determined the variability in burn depth based on biopsy location, burn location and investigator in a porcine model of partial thickness burns. METHODS: 24 partial thickness burns (2.5 cm by 2.5 cm each) were created on the backs of 2 anesthetized pigs by 2 investigators (one experienced, one inexperienced) using a previously validated model. In one of the pigs, the necrotic epidermis covering each burn was removed. Five full thickness 4mm punch biopsies were obtained 1h after injury from the four corners and center of the burns and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin and Masson's trichrome for determination of burn depth by a board certified dermatopathologist blinded to burn location and investigator. Comparisons of burn depth by biopsy location, burn location and investigator were performed with t-tests and ANOVA as appropriate. RESULTS: The mean (SD) depth of injury to blood vessels (the main determinant of burn progression) in debrided and non-debrided pigs pooled together was 1.8 (0.3)mm, which included 75% of the dermal depth. Non-debrided burns were 0.24 mm deeper than debrided burns (P<0.001). Burn depth increased marginally from cephalic to caudal in non-debrided burns, but showed no statistical differences for these locations, in debrided burns. Additionally, there were also no statistical differences in burn depths from midline to lateral in either of these burn types. Burn depth was similar for both investigators and among biopsy locations. CONCLUSIONS: Burn depth was greater for caudal locations in non-debrided burns and overall non-debrided burns were deeper than debrided burns. However, burn depth did not differ based on investigator, biopsy site, and medial-lateral location.

Topical antibiotic ointment versus silver-containing foam dressing for second-degree burns in swine.

OBJECTIVES: Second-degree burns are very common but their management is controversial. These burns may be treated with either topical antimicrobial agents or advanced occlusive dressings; however, there is no established treatment comparator for preclinical studies. This study was designed to determine which of two commonly used comparator therapies (a silver-containing advanced dressing or a topical antibiotic ointment) resulted in faster reepithelialization and less scarring. The hypothesis was that second-degree burns treated with a topical antimicrobial ointment would heal faster and with less scarring than those treated with a silver-containing occlusive foam dressing in a porcine model. METHODS: Deep partial-thickness burns were created on the flanks of three anesthetized female domestic pigs (20 to 25 kg) using a 150-g aluminum bar preheated in 80°C water bath and applied to the skin for 20 seconds using a force of 2 kg. The burn eschars were excised 48 hours later with an electric dermatome set at a depth of 0.75 mm. The wound beds were treated with a thin layer of triple-antibiotic petrolatum-based ointment (changed three times weekly) or a silver-containing foam dressing (changed once weekly). Full-thickness punch biopsies were obtained at 9, 11, 14, 16, 18, and 21 days for determination of percentage complete wound reepithelialization and at 28 days for measurement of scar depth. RESULTS: At all dressing changes the wounds treated with the topical antibiotic appeared moist, while those treated with the silver-based dressings appeared dry. At day 21 all wounds treated with the ointment were completely reepithelialized, while only 55% of those treated with the silver dressing were reepithelialized (p < 0.001). Scar depth at day 28 was also significantly less in wounds treated with the topical antibiotic ointment (4.3 mm vs. 5.1 mm, difference = 0.7 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.1 to 1.4 mm). There was less scar contraction in wounds treated with the topical antibiotic compared with the silver-based dressing (mean ± SD = 25.0% ± 14.6% vs. 38.9% ± 16.9%, difference = 13.9%; 95% CI = 5.7% to 22.0%). CONCLUSIONS: In this model of excised deep partial-thickness burns, a triple-antibiotic ointment enhanced reepithelialization and reduced scar depth and contraction compared with a silver-based foam dressing. This triple-antibiotic ointment should be considered as a control for studies evaluating novel topical burn therapies.