Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Vet Sci ; 18(4): 449-456, 2017 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28385014

ABSTRACT

The present study investigated the prevalence and mechanisms of fluoroquinolone (FQ)/quinolone (Q) resistance in Escherichia (E.) coli isolates from companion animals, pet-owners, and non-pet-owners. A total of 63 E. coli isolates were collected from 104 anal swab samples, and 27 nalidixic acid (NA)-resistant isolates were identified. Of those, 10 showed ciprofloxacin (CIP) resistance. A plasmid-mediated Q resistance gene was detected in one isolate. Increased efflux pump activity, as measured by organic solvent tolerance assay, was detected in 18 NA-resistant isolates (66.7%), but was not correlated with an increase in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Target gene mutations in Q resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) were the main cause of (FQ)Q resistance in E. coli. Point mutations in QRDRs were detected in all NA-resistant isolates, and the number of mutations was strongly correlated with increased MIC (R = 0.878 for NA and 0.954 for CIP). All CIP-resistant isolates (n = 10) had double mutations in the gyrA gene, with additional mutations in parC and parE. Interestingly, (FQ)Q resistance mechanisms in isolates from companion animals were the same as those in humans. Therefore, prudent use of (FQ)Q in veterinary medicine is warranted to prevent the dissemination of (FQ)Q-resistant bacteria from animals to humans.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/physiology , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Nalidixic Acid/pharmacology , Pets/microbiology , Animals , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/metabolism , Humans , Ownership
2.
J Vet Med Sci ; 79(3): 486-491, 2017 Mar 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28190823

ABSTRACT

Companion animals are considered as one of the reservoirs of antimicrobial-resistant (AR) bacteria that can be cross-transmitted to humans. However, limited information is available on the possibility of AR bacteria originating from companion animals being transmitted secondarily from owners to non-owners sharing the same space. To address this issue, the present study investigated clonal relatedness among AR E. coli isolated from dog owners and non-owners in the same college classroom or household. Anal samples (n=48) were obtained from 14 owners and 34 non-owners; 31 E. coli isolates were collected (nine from owners and 22 from non-owners). Of 31 E. coli, 20 isolates (64.5%) were resistant to at least one antimicrobial, and 16 isolates (51.6%) were determined as multi-drug resistant E. coli. Six isolates (19.4%) harbored integrase genes (five harbored class I integrase gene and one harbored class 2 integrase gene, respectively). Pulsed-field gel electrophoretic analysis identified three different E. coli clonal sets among isolates, indicating that cross-transmission of AR E. coli can easily occur between owners and non-owners. The findings emphasize a potential risk of spread of AR bacteria originating from pets within human communities, once they are transferred to humans. Further studies are needed to evaluate the exact risk and identify the risk factors of secondarily transmission by investigating larger numbers of isolates from pets, their owners and non-owners in a community.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Dogs/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Pets/microbiology , Animals , Disease Reservoirs , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/veterinary , Escherichia coli/genetics , Feces/microbiology , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27638114

ABSTRACT

Antimicrobial-resistant (AR) enterococci have emerged as leading nosocomial pathogens. Transmission of AR Enterococci from animals to humans has been demonstrated. However, there is limited information on the transmission of enterococci from horses to humans. To address this issue, we characterized 260 enterococci isolated from horse-associated samples in Korea in 2013 based on their AR profiles and virulence traits. AR profiling revealed an average ratio of AR enterococci of 23.8%. Seven isolates (2.7%) were multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Most tetracycline-resistant enterococci harbored either tetM or tetL or both genes; genes conferring resistance to other antimicrobials were detected at low rates. Biofilm formation and gelatinase activity were observed in 51.1% and 47.7% of isolates, respectively; most were E. faecalis harboring the gelE gene. Evidence of transmission of AR enterococci between horses and their environments was provided by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and highlights the risk of AR enterococcus transmission to horse riders and handlers through close contact.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Enterococcus/drug effects , Enterococcus/pathogenicity , Horses/microbiology , Animals , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Biofilms , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/transmission , Drug Resistance, Microbial/genetics , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Enterococcus/enzymology , Enterococcus/genetics , Enterococcus faecalis/genetics , Feces/microbiology , Gelatinases/biosynthesis , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/transmission , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Republic of Korea , Virulence/genetics
4.
J Vet Sci ; 17(2): 199-206, 2016 Jun 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26645344

ABSTRACT

Limited information is available regarding horse-associated antimicrobial resistant (AR) Escherichia (E.) coli. This study was designed to evaluate the frequency and characterize the pattern of AR E. coli from healthy horse-associated samples. A total of 143 E. coli (4.6%) were isolated from 3,078 samples collected from three national racetracks and 14 private horse-riding courses in Korea. Thirty of the E. coli isolates (21%) showed antimicrobial resistance to at least one antimicrobial agent, and four of the AR E. coli (13.3%) were defined as multi-drug resistance. Most of the AR E. coli harbored AR genes corresponding to their antimicrobial resistance phenotypes. Four of the AR E. coli carried class 1 integrase gene (intI1), a gene associated with multi-drug resistance. Pulsed-field gel electrophoretic analysis showed no genetic relatedness among AR E. coli isolated from different facilities; however, cross-transmissions between horses or horses and environments were detected in two facilities. Although cross-transmission of AR E. coli in horses and their environments was generally low, our study suggests a risk of transmission of AR bacteria between horses and humans. Further studies are needed to evaluate the risk of possible transmission of horse-associated AR bacteria to human communities through horse riders and horse-care workers.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Escherichia coli Infections/veterinary , Horse Diseases/epidemiology , Animals , Escherichia coli , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Feces/microbiology , Horse Diseases/microbiology , Horses , Phylogeny , Prevalence , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Sequence Analysis, DNA/veterinary
5.
J Microbiol Biotechnol ; 24(3): 386-93, 2014 Mar 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24296459

ABSTRACT

Possible cross-transmission of hospital-associated enterococci between human patients, medical staff, and hospital environments has been extensively studied. However, limited information is available for veterinary hospital-associated Enterococcus isolates. This study investigated the possibility of cross-transmission of antibiotic-resistant enterococci between dog patients, their owners, veterinary staff, and hospital environments. Swab samples (n =46 5) were obtained from five veterinary hospitals in Seoul, Korea, during 2011. Forty-three Enterococcus strains were isolated, representing seven enterococcal species. E. faecalis and E. faecium were the most dominant species (16 isolates each, 37.2%). Although slight differences in the antibiotic resistance profiles were observed between the phenotypic and the genotypic data, our antibiogram analysis demonstrated high prevalence of the multiple drug-resistant (MDR) isolates of E. faecalis (10/16 isolates, 62.5%) and E. faecium (12/16 isolates, 75.0%). Pulsed-field gel electrophoretic comparison of the MDR isolates revealed three different clonal sets of E. faecalis and a single set of E. faecium, which were isolated from different sample groups or dog patients at the same or two separate veterinary hospitals. These results imply a strong possibility of cross-transmission of the antibiotic-resistant enterococcal species between animal patients, owners, veterinary staff, and hospital environments.


Subject(s)
Enterococcus/isolation & purification , Environmental Microbiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/veterinary , Hospitals, Animal , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cluster Analysis , Dogs , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Enterococcus/classification , Enterococcus/drug effects , Enterococcus/genetics , Genotype , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/transmission , Humans , Korea/epidemiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Molecular Epidemiology , Molecular Typing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...