ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the effect of combined teaching of optical laryngoscope and general laryngoscope on anesthesia undergraduate practice.Methods:A total of 40 anesthesia undergraduate students were randomly divided into group A (using the optical laryngocope only in the first month and the general laryngoscope only in the second month, n=20), and group B (using the general laryngocope only in the first month and the optical laryngoscope only in the second month, n=20). The teaching effect was evaluated through the first month and the second month of tracheal intubation assessment and questionnaire survey results. SPSS 23.0 was used for t test and chi-square test. Results:In the first month, the success rate was 90% in group A and 60% in group B, which showed that the success rate of group B was lower, with significant differences ( P < 0.05). The time for tracheal intubation in group A was (61.8±5.0) s, and that in the group B was (83.0±4.9) s, showing that the time of group B was longer, with significant differences ( P < 0.05). The complications in group A was 5%, and that in group B was 14%, showing that the group B had more cases of implications, with significant differences ( P < 0.05). In the second month, there was no significant difference in the one-time success rate, the time for tracheal intubation, and complications between the two groups ( P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in one-time success rate and complications between groups. Both groups showed that the time for general laryngoscope intubation was longer, with significant differences ( P < 0.05). All of the students believed that applying optical laryngoscope teaching was beneficial and could enhance the interest of learning, and the combination of the two methods was better. Conclusion:Using the optical laryngoscope first and then the general laryngoscope teaching is more beneficial for students to master the two methods of tracheal intubation, improve the success rate, reduce complications, and cultivates their self-confidence.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of palliative care in the treatment of pain and life quality in later period tumor patients.Methods 103 patients with advanced tumors in our hospital were selected and divided into group A(51 patients) and group B(52 patients) based on the methods of treatment.The patients in group A were given conventional treatment,and the patients in group B were given palliative care program on the basis of the treat-ment in group A.The effects of the groups A and B were observed and compared.Results The pain levels of group A and B before treatment had no statistically significant difference (P>0.05).The pain level score of group B after treatment was (26.41 ±3.55)points,which was lower than (32.56 ±7.12)points in group A,and the difference was statistically significant (t=6.430,P0.05).After treatment,the life quality score of group B was (66.85 ±6.75)points,which was higher than (53.39 ±6.74)points in group A,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion It is effective for palliative care to treat the patients with advanced tumors on their pain management and quality of life, which is worthy of clinical application.
