Is perioperative brachytherapy effective in carcinoma of the tongue?

Purpose: To analyze the results of patients treated with perioperative interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) in tongue carcinoma (TC). Material and methods: From April 2009 to May 2015, 43 squamous cell carcinoma consecutive patients diagnosed with TC were treated with limited partial glossectomy and perioperative ISBT, using high-dose-rate (HDR). Twenty- seven patients were treated by brachytherapy (BT), and sixteen received BT as a complement to subsequent external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) after results of lymph node dissection. Median age was 66 years. Distribution by stage, included 10 patients stage I, 14 stage II, 10 stage III, and 9 stage IV. Eighteen patients had negative margins, nineteen margin involvement, and in six cases, the margin was < 5 mm. Results: With a median follow-up of 54 months, LC at 3 and 5 years was 87% and 84%, respectively. LC was 95% at five years in patients with clear margins, and 75% with involved margins. LC in N0 patients treated with BT was 83% at 5 years, and in patients N+ with posterior EBRT treatment, LC was 86%. By tumor size, we found one local relapse in 13 cases T1, in 5 of 27 patients T2 was found, and no local relapse T3 with LC of 87%, 70%, and 100% respectively at five years. Regional control (RC) was 81% at 3 and 5 years. We found a metastasis-free survival of 91% at 3- and 5-year. Twenty-three patients have died, 11 of them due to other causes, with overall survival of 56% at three years and 53% at five years. Conclusions: Combined treatment with conservative surgery and ISBT shows similar results to radical surgery or RT alone, allowing a more patient-tailored approach, with good organ function preservation and cosmetic outcomes.

GOECP/SEOR radiotherapy guidelines for small-cell lung cancer.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 20% of all lung cancers. The main treatment is chemotherapy (Ch). However, the addition of radiotherapy significantly improves overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic SCLC and in those with metastatic SCLC who respond to Ch. Prophylactic cranial irradiation reduces the risk of brain metastases and improves OS in both metastatic and non-metastatic patients. The 5-year OS rate in patients with limited-stage disease (non-metastatic) is slightly higher than 30%, but less than 5% in patients with extensive-stage disease (metastatic). The present clinical guidelines were developed by Spanish radiation oncologists on behalf of the Oncologic Group for the Study of Lung Cancer/Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology to provide a current review of the diagnosis, planning, and treatment of SCLC. These guidelines emphasise treatment fields, radiation techniques, fractionation, concomitant treatment, and the optimal timing of Ch and radiotherapy. Finally, we discuss the main indications for reirradiation in local recurrence.

High-dose neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone followed by surgery in potentially-resectable stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC. A multi-institutional retrospective study by the Oncologic Group for the Study of Lung Cancer (Spanish Radiation Oncology Society).

BACKGROUND: The optimal induction treatment in potentially-resectable stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC remains undefined. AIM: To compare neoadjuvant high-dose chemoradiotherapy (CRT) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CHT) in patients with resectable, stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Retrospective, multicentre study of 99 patients diagnosed with stage cT1-T3N2M0 NSCLC who underwent neoadjuvant treatment (high-dose CRT or CHT) followed by surgery between January 2005 and December 2014. RESULTS: 47 patients (47.5%) underwent CRT and 52 (52.5%) CHT, with a median follow-up of 41 months. Surgery consisted of lobectomy (87.2% and 82.7%, in the CRT and CHT groups, respectively) or pneumonectomy (12.8% vs. 17.3%). Nodal downstaging (to N1/N0) and Pathologic complete response (pCR; pT0pN0) rates were significantly higher in the CRT group (89.4% vs. 57.7% and 46.8% vs. 7.7%, respectively; p < 0.001)). Locoregional recurrence was significantly lower in the CRT group (8.5% vs. 13.5%; p = 0.047) but distant recurrence rates were similar in the two groups. Median PFS was 45 months (CHT) vs. "not reached" (CRT). Median OS was similar: 61 vs. 56 months (p = 0.803). No differences in grade ≥3 toxicity were observed. On the Cox regression analysis, advanced pT stage was associated with worse OS and PFS (p < 0.001) and persistent N2 disease (p = 0.002) was associated with worse PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, a higher proportion of patients treated with preoperative CRT achieved nodal downstaging and pCR with better locoregional control. However, there were no differences in survival. More studies are needed to know the optimal treatment of these patients.