Spontaneous spinal epidural haematoma: management and main risk factors in era of anticoagulant / antiplatelet treatment.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Spontaneous spinal epidural haematomas (SSEH) are rare nosological units wherein acute collections of blood develop in the spinal canal. SSEH are usually manifested by sudden severe back pain accompanied by the development of neurological symptoms. In this study, we retrospectively describe management and the main risk factors of SSEH in a series of 14 cases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2010 and 2019, we examined 14 patients (age range 17-89 years, 10 women) diagnosed with SSEH. Eight cases were patients using anticoagulant therapies (six warfarin, one dabigatran, one apixaban) and two others were using ASA of 100 mg/day. The exact localisation and extent of changes was determined from acute magnetic resonance imaging. Three people using warfarin had INR values higher than 3.0 at the time of their diagnosis. RESULTS: Ten patients (71%) were taking oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents. In seven patients, SSEH were localised in the lower cervical/thoracic spine. Ten patients (71%) had arterial hypertension. Six patients underwent acute surgery due to rapidly developing spinal cord compression. Eight patients (57%) with slight or mild neurological symptoms were successfully managed without surgery. CONCLUSIONS: SSEH should be suspected in any patient receiving anticoagulant/antiplatelet agents who complains of sudden, severe back pain accompanied by neurological symptoms. SSEH is mostly localised in the lower cervical/thoracic spine. Arterial hypertension appears to be a risk factor of SSEH. Early decompression is an important therapeutic approach; in cases with minor neurological deficits, conservative treatment may be chosen.

The effect of different doses and different routes of acetylsalicylic acid administration on platelet aggregation in healthy volunteers and ischemic stroke patients.

The purpose was to assess the effect of different doses and different routes of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) administration on platelet aggregation and the comparison between platelet aggregation after the single and the repetitive administration of ASA in healthy individuals and in patients after ischemic stroke. The study group consists of 22 healthy individuals and 30 patients with documented ischemic stroke. Platelet aggregation was measured in healthy individuals: (a) twice before ASA and (b) 2 h after different single doses and different routes of ASA administration-(b1) 500 mg orally, (b2) 500 mg intravenously, and (b3) 100 mg orally. We measured aggregability in healthy individuals after five consecutive days of 100 mg of ASA q.d. and in patients on chronic ASA 100 mg q.d. The VerifyNow was used with results expressed in aspirin reaction units (ARU). In healthy individuals, the dose-(b1) 500 mg orally-reduced the aggregability to mean (SD) 392 (36) ARU (p < 0.001), (b2) 500 mg intravenously to 428 (46) (p < 0.001) and (b3) 100 mg orally to 460 (76) (p < 0.001). The suppression of aggregation after 500 mg was (p = 0.029) higher after the oral compared to intravenous administration, and the same is true for the suppression after single dose of 500 mg orally and 100 mg orally (p = 0.011). Oral dose 100 mg for 5 days in healthy individuals reduced aggregation to 405 (37) and in post-stroke patients to 433 (54). All doses of ASA, both orally and intravenously, have produced a significant reduction of platelet aggregation. Preference of the parenteral to oral application has not been established.