ABSTRACT
The present study evaluated short- and long-term efficacy and tolerability of augmentative vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in a group of patients with treatment-resistant depression (N = 6). A statistically significant improvement in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS21) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale after 3 months (P = 0.039 and P = 0.05, respectively) was found in comparison with baseline (VNS implant). After 12 months, a statistically significant improvement was observed in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS21), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, and Clinical Global Impression (P = 0.01, P = 0.005, and P = 0.001, respectively). Patients showed an overall favorable tolerability. Present data support VNS short- and long-term efficacy and tolerability in a small group of patients with treatment-resistant depression. Further controlled investigation is necessary to confirm the present open findings.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/therapy , Vagus Nerve Stimulation/methods , Adult , Age of Onset , Aged , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant , Electrodes, Implanted , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Suicide, Attempted , Treatment Outcome , Vagus Nerve Stimulation/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: : The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been poorly investigated in the long-term. The present follow-up study was aimed to assess the long-term efficacy and the discontinuation effects of rTMS in a sample of depressed bipolar patients. METHODS: : After the completion of an acute trial with augmentative, low-frequency, navigated rTMS, 11 drug-resistant depressed bipolar subjects (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition [Text Revision] criteria) entered a naturalistic follow-up with monthly evaluations through the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Young Mania Rating Scale. RESULTS: : After 1 year of follow-up, results showed that the achievement of remission after acute rTMS was predictive of maintenance of response at 1 year. On the other hand, the absence of acute rTMS response predicted the absence of subsequent response in the long-term. CONCLUSIONS: : This first report on the long-term discontinuation effects after acute rTMS suggests that immediate remission is predictive of sustained benefit after 1 year. Larger controlled studies are needed to confirm present preliminary findings.
Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Time , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been poorly investigated in bipolar depression. The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of low-frequency repetitive TMS (rTMS) of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) combined with brain navigation in a sample of bipolar depressed subjects. METHODS: Eleven subjects with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder and major depressive episode who did not respond to previous pharmacological treatment were treated with three weeks of open-label rTMS at 1 Hz, 110% of motor threshold, 300 stimuli/day. RESULTS: All subjects completed the trial showing a statistically significant improvement on the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, and Clinical Global Impression severity of illness scale (ANOVAs with repeated measures: F = 22.36, p < 0.0001; F = 12.66, p < 0.0001; and F = 10.41, p < 0.0001, respectively). In addition, stimulation response, defined as an endpoint HAM-D score reduction of > or =50% compared to baseline, was achieved by 6 out of 11 subjects, 4 of whom were considered remitters (HAM-D endpoint score < or = 8). Partial response (endpoint HAM-D score reduction between 25% and 50%) was achieved by 3/11 patients. No manic/hypomanic activation was detected during the treatment according to Young Mania Rating Scale scores (ANOVAs with repeated measures: F = 0.62, p = 0.61). Side effects were slight and were limited to the first days of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Augmentative low-frequency rTMS of the right DLPFC combined with brain navigation was effective and well tolerated in a small sample of drug-resistant bipolar depressive patients, even though the lack of a sham controlled group limits confidence in the results.
