Validation of the Italian version of the Parkinson's Disease- Cognitive Functional Rating Scale.

A key distinguishing factor between mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in Parkinson's disease (PD) lies in the notable decrease in functioning due to cognitive impairment. The Parkinson's Disease-Cognitive Functional Rating Scale (PD-CRFS) was developed to assess functional limitations caused by cognitive impairment, while reducing the influence of motor impairment. The aim of this multicenter study was to (i) validate the Italian version of the PD-CFRS in PD, (ii) determine optimal cut-off scores for detecting MCI and dementia in PD, (iii) compare its performances with the most established functional assessment tool (IADL). Six hundred and sixty nine PD participants were recruited from 4 Italian Movement Disorders centers (Venice, Milan, Gravedona, and Salerno). They underwent Level-II cognitive evaluation, which resulted in 282 PD-NC, 310 PD-MCI, and 77 PDD. The PD-CFRS's psychometric and clinimetric properties, applicability, and responsiveness were analyzed. The PD-CFRS showed high acceptability. Floor and ceiling effects were acceptable. It also displayed strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.738), and test-retest reliability (ICC = .854). The PD-CFRS demonstrated higher coefficient of variation to detect dysfunction in PD-MCI patients in comparison to the IADL scale (PD-CFRS 96% vs IADL 22.5%). Convergent validity with the IADL was r = - 0.638 and - 0.527 in males and females, respectively. PD-CFRS total score negatively correlated with global cognition (MoCA corrected score r = - 0.61; p < 0.001). A cut-off score > 6.5 identified PDD with a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 88% (AUC = .959). A cut-off value of > 1 detected PD-MCI with a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 69% (AUC = .695). The Italian version of the PD-CFRS demonstrated to be an easy, valid and reliable tool that properly captures functional impairment due to cognitive decline in PD. It also proved to be particularly effective in the advanced stages of PD, and would be a useful support for the diagnosis of PD-MCI and PDD.

Deep brain stimulation of globus pallidus internus and subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease: a multicenter, retrospective study of efficacy and safety.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapeutic option in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Literature data and recent guidelines remain inconclusive about the best choice as a target between the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the globus pallidus internus (GPi). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical efficacy outcomes of 48 DBS-implanted patients (33 STN-DBS and 15 GPi-DBS) at a short- (<1 year from the surgery) and long-term (2-5 years) follow-up. Also, clinical safety outcomes, including postoperative surgical complications and severe side effects, were collected. RESULTS: We found no difference between STN-DBS and GPi-DBS in improving motor symptoms at short-term evaluation. However, STN-DBS achieved a more prominent reduction in oral therapy (L-DOPA equivalent daily dose, P = .02). By contrast, GPi-DBS was superior in ameliorating motor fluctuations and dyskinesia (MDS-UPDRS IV, P < .001) as well as motor experiences of daily living (MDS-UPDRS II, P = .03). The greater efficacy of GPi-DBS on motor fluctuations and experiences of daily living was also present at the long-term follow-up. We observed five serious adverse events, including two suicides, all among STN-DBS patients. CONCLUSION: Both STN-DBS and GPi-DBS are effective in improving motor symptoms severity and complications, but GPi-DBS has a greater impact on motor fluctuations and motor experiences of daily living. These results suggest that the two targets should be considered equivalent in motor efficacy, with GPi-DBS as a valuable option in patients with prominent motor complications. The occurrence of suicides in STN-treated patients claims further attention in target selection.

Clinical, cognitive, and morphometric profiles of progressive supranuclear palsy phenotypes.

The International Parkinson's and Movement Disorder Society (MDS) criteria for progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) have broadened the clinical spectrum of the disease and established phenotypic characterization according to the predominant manifestation at onset. The objective of this study is to describe clinical/cognitive and imaging features of a monocentric cohort of PSP patients, highlighting different patterns of functional disability according to the assigned phenotype. We retrospectively reviewed clinical/imaging data of 53 PSP patients diagnosed with probable PSP according to the MDS criteria and 40 age/sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). Neurological/neuropsychological assessments were performed using standardized scales, as well as comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) morphometric measurements. In our cohort, there were 24/53 PSP-RS (Richardson's syndrome), 13/53 PSP-P (Parkinsonism), 7/53 PSP-PGF (Progressive gait freezing), and 9/53 PSP-Cog (Cognitive impairment). PSP-Cog presented the worst motor profiles, the highest percentages of dementia and impaired functional autonomy; 4/9 PSP-Cog and 2/7 PSP-PGF died. PSP-P had the lowest motor/cognitive burden. All MRI parameters had good discriminative efficacy vs. HCs, with P/M 2.0 discriminating PSP-PGF from PSP-RS and PSP-Cog. We highlighted discrete clinical and imaging patterns that best characterize different PSP phenotypes. PSP-Cog and PSP-PGF/RS manifest greater incidence of dementia and motor disability, respectively, while PSP-P has a more benign course. The identification of different phenotypes may be the expression of different progression patterns requiring tailored approaches in terms of follow-up and treatment. These findings support the concept of discrete patterns of Tau pathology within the PSP spectrum and encourage research for phenotype-specific outcome measures.

Effect of Intensive Rehabilitation Program in Thermal Water on a Group of People with Parkinson's Disease: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study.

The main objective of this study is to test the effect of thermal aquatic exercise on motor symptoms and quality of life in people with Parkinson's Disease (PD). Fourteen participants with diagnosis of idiopathic PD completed the whole rehabilitation session and evaluation protocol (Hoehn and Yahr in OFF state: 2-3; Mini Mental State Examination >24; stable pharmacological treatment in the 3 months prior participating in the study). Cognitive and motor status, functional abilities and quality of life were assessed at baseline and after an intensive rehabilitation program in thermal water (12 sessions of 45 min in a 1.4 m depth pool at 32-36 ∘C). The Mini Balance Evaluation System Test (Mini-BESTest) and the PD Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQ-39) were considered as main outcomes. Secondary assessment measures evaluated motor symptoms and quality of life and psychological well-being. Participants kept good cognitive and functional status after treatment. Balance of all the participants significantly improved (Mini-BESTest: p<0.01). The PDQ-39 significantly improved after rehabilitation (p=0.038), with significance being driven by dimensions strongly related to motor status. Thermal aquatic exercise may represent a promising rehabilitation tool to prevent the impact of motor symptoms on daily-life activities of people with PD. PDQ-39 improvement foreshows good effects of the intervention on quality of life and psychological well-being.

Impact of social and mobility restrictions in Parkinson's disease during COVID-19 lockdown.

BACKGROUND: The consequences of strict COVID-19 mobility restrictions on motor/non-motor features in Parkinson's disease (PD) have not been systematically studied but worse mobility and quality of life have been reported. To elucidate this question, 12 mild to moderate PD patients were assessed in March 2020 before and after two months of isolation as part of a clinical study that had to be interrupted due to the pandemic and the implementation of COVID19 mobility restrictions. METHODS: Twelve patients were systematically evaluated before and after the lockdown period as part of a larger cohort that previously underwent thermal water rehabilitation. Clinical outcomes were the Body Mass index, the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, the MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III, the 6 Minute Walking Test and the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire. Global cognition was evaluated with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale. The impact of COVID-19 restrictions on quality of life and functional independence was evaluated with The Parkinson's disease Quality of life (PDQ-39), the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living questionnaires (IADL) and the Parkinson's disease cognitive functional rating scales (PD-CFRS). RESULTS: After two months of isolation the Mini-BESTest score worsened (p=0.005), and four patients reported one or more falls during the lockdown. BMI increased (p=0.031) while the remaining clinical variables including quality of life did not change. CONCLUSION: We observed moderate worsening at Mini-BESTest, greater risk of falls and increased body weight as consequence of prolonged immobility. We believe negative effects were partially softened since patients were in contact with our multidisciplinary team during the lockdown and had previously received training to respond to the needs of this emergency isolation. These findings highligh the importnace of patient-centered interventions in PD management.

Impact of Cognitive Profile on Impulse Control Disorders Presence and Severity in Parkinson's Disease.

Background: Impulse control disorders (ICDs) and related behaviors are frequent in Parkinson's disease (PD). Mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) and dementia (PDD), both characterized by heterogeneous cognitive phenotypes, are also commonly reported in PD. However, the frequency and severity of ICD within PD cognitive states is unknown. Methods: Three hundred and twenty-six PD patients completed a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment and were classified as PD-MCI, PDD, or without cognitive alterations (PD-NC). The Minnesota impulsive disorders interview was used to ascertain the presence (ICD+) or absence (ICD-) of ICD. The Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease-Rating Scale was used to assess ICD severity. A subsample of 286 patients evaluated with the same cognitive tasks was selected in order to investigate the characteristics of ICD in PD cognitive phenotypes. Results: ICDs were present in 55% of PD-NC, in 50% of PD-MCI, and in 42% of PDD patients. Frequencies of ICD+ with attentive (ICD+: 20% vs. ICD-: 4%; p = 0.031) and executive impairments (ICD+: 44% vs. ICD-: 30%; p = 0.027) were higher in the PD-MCI and PDD subgroups, respectively. As expected, no differences were observed in the PD-NC. PD-MCI with attentive impairments presented higher percentage of ICD+ with deficits in the Trail Making Test B-A but not in the Digit Span Sequencing task. In PDD, executive failures concerned Similarities task (ICD+: 67%; ICD-: 29%; p = 0.035), with no differences between ICD+ and ICD- in the Stroop task. Conclusions: Prevalence and severity of ICDs and related behaviors do not differ in PD with different cognitive states. However, ICD+ are more likely to show deficits, respectively in attentive and in executive domains, specifically in the Trail Making Test B-A task for the attention and working memory domain in PD-MCI and in the Similarities task for the executive function domain in PDD. Prospective studies should evaluate if these tests can be used as screening tool for ICDs in PD.