ABSTRACT
Multidetector computed tomography angiography (CTA) provides information on plaque extent and stenosis in the coronary wall. More accurate lesion assessment may be feasible with CTA as compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Accordingly, lesion length assessment was compared between ICA and CTA in patients referred for CTA who underwent subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). 89 patients clinically referred for CTA were subsequently referred for ICA and PCI. On CTA, lesion length was measured from the proximal to the distal shoulder of the plaque. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was performed to analyze lesion length. Stent length was recorded for each lesion. In total, 119 lesions were retrospectively identified. Mean lesion length on CTA was 21.4 ± 8.4 mm and on QCA 12.6 ± 6.1 mm. Mean stent length deployed was 17.4 ± 5.3 mm. Lesion length on CTA was significantly longer than on QCA (difference 8.8 ± 6.7 mm, P < 0.001). Moreover, lesion length visualized on CTA was also significantly longer than mean stent length (CTA lesion length-stent length was 4.2 ± 8.7 mm, P < 0.001). Lesion length assessed by CTA is longer than that assessed by ICA. Possibly, CTA provides more accurate lesion length assessment than ICA and may facilitate improved guidance of percutaneous treatment of coronary lesions.
Subject(s)
Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Multidetector Computed Tomography , Plaque, Atherosclerotic , Aged , Coronary Artery Disease/pathology , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Coronary Vessels/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation , Predictive Value of Tests , Prosthesis Design , Retrospective Studies , StentsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Dopamine plays an important role in the regulation of respiration and low-dose dopamine infusion is associated with a decreased respiratory drive response to hypoxia in animals and humans. The effects of dopamine on ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that dopamine inhibits ventilation in patients with COPD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a double-blinded, cross-over, placebo-controlled, randomized study we studied nine patients with decompensated COPD, ventilated in the pressure support mode in the intensive care unit (ICU) and five ambulatory patients with stable COPD. All patients received 5 micro g kg(-1) min(-1) of dopamine or an equivalent volume of 5% glucose solution. RESULTS: In the mechanically ventilated COPD patients, there was no difference in the effects of dopamine compared with placebo on blood pressure, heart rate, minute ventilation (-0.5 +/- 1.1 vs. -0.2 +/- 0.9 L min(-1), P = 0.46, respectively), respiratory rate (-0.4 +/- 2.7 vs. -0.3 +/- 2.1 min(-1), P = 0.96), PaO(2) (-5 +/- 4 vs. -5 +/- 10 mmHg, P = 0.90, respectively), or PaCO(2) (-0.7 +/- 1.4 vs. -1.0 +/- 3.4 mmHg, P = 0.83, respectively). In spontaneously breathing stable patients, dopamine increased systolic blood pressure (P = 0.02) but did not influence other haemodynamic and respiratory variables. CONCLUSION: Although low-dose dopamine has been shown to depress ventilation in a variety of conditions, it does not compromise ventilation in COPD patients either breathing spontaneously or when weaned using pressure support ventilation.
