Subject(s)
Genital Neoplasms, Female/drug therapy , Genital Neoplasms, Female/radiotherapy , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/drug therapy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Vulvar Neoplasms/drug therapy , Vulvar Neoplasms/radiotherapySubject(s)
Brachytherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, High-Energy , Humans , Male , Radiotherapy DosageABSTRACT
This paper reports the results of the EBV-specific antibody response in 17 Italian nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients, 15 other head and neck tumor patients and 15 normal controls. Nucleic acid hybridization has been performed on the biopsy tissue from 4 of the NPC patients, and EBV-DNA was present in two undifferentiated (WHO 3) tumors, and absent in two samples of the keratinizing (WHO 1) type. EBV serology appears to be specifically related to NPC, more evidently for VCA-IgA and EA-IgG antibodies, and useful as an aid in diagnosis of NPC. However, in order to assess a prognostic value of the above markers, a greater number of patients followed for a longer period of time (at least 5 years) is needed, and is currently being pursued.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/analysis , Head and Neck Neoplasms/microbiology , Herpesvirus 4, Human/immunology , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/microbiology , Adult , Biopsy , Capsid/immunology , Child , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin A/analysis , Immunoglobulin G/analysis , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Nucleic Acid HybridizationABSTRACT
The authors have reviewed their experiences in determining the presence of liver metastases in 103 patients by radiocolloid scanning. The sensitivity of liver scanning proved to be quite low if the presence of focal defects of tracer's distribution was chosen as the diagnostic criterion. The inclusion of less restrictive criteria, such as liver enlargement or irregular distribution of the tracer, resulted in an higher sensitivity without lowering the predictive value of a negative scan. Using the more extensive diagnostic criterion, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were in the range of 90%. Abnormal liver scans are common in patients classified as T3-T4 or N+ and their chances of to be "true positives" are high. Conversely, abnormal scans are seldom found in patients classified as T1-T2 or N0 and chances of "false positives" are high.