Trial of the combination of mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

In prior trials, mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin have each been shown to have reproducible antitumor activity as single agents when used in the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The two-drug combinations of vindesine plus high-dose cisplatin or mitomycin have shown an improved major response rate and manageable toxicity in prior trials. In this report, 90 patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer were treated with the three-drug combination of mitomycin (8 mg/m2), vindesine (3 mg/m2), and high-dose cisplatin (120 mg/m2). Eighty-seven patients (97%) were adequate for both response and toxicity. Major objective responses occurred in 60% of the patients. The toxicity of this regimen was predictable and manageable when established supportive care measures were employed. Based on the response rate observed, the combination of these three agents merits further study in randomized trials against other chemotherapeutic regimens and consideration of its use in adjuvant and preoperative settings.

Phase II trial of oral 4-demethoxydaunorubicin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

4-Demethoxydaunorubicin (4-DMDR) is an orally active analog of daunorubicin that in preclinical testing has demonstrated greater antitumor activity and less cardiotoxicity than its parent compound. Thirty-two patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer received 4-DMDR at a dose of 40-50 mg/m2 orally every 21 days. Thirteen patients had received no prior chemotherapy. Among the 30 adequately treated patients, one major response lasting 5.2 months was observed. Leukopenia 10-14 days after treatment was the most commonly observed toxicity. With an overall observed major response rate of 3.3% in 30 patients, the predicted true response rate is less than or equal to 16% (p = 0.05). At the dose and schedule studied in this group of patients with non-small cell lung cancer, 4-DMDR had only marginal activity.

Randomized trial comparing vindesine plus cisplatin with vinblastine plus cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, with an analysis of methods of response assessment.

One hundred eight patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin (120 mg/m2) with either vindesine (3 mg/m2) or vinblastine (6 mg/m2). None had previously received chemotherapy. An additional goal was to determine if the observation of visible evaluable lesions was as accurate a method of response assessment as the observation of bidimensionally measurable lesions in non-small cell lung cancer. When vindesine plus cisplatin was compared to vinblastine plus cisplatin, response rates (33% vs 41%), median response durations (8.6 vs 5.6 months), and median survival times of responding patients (18.4 vs 16.2 months) were similar. Response rates, response durations, and survival times of responding patients determined through the observation of evaluable or measurable indicator lesions did not differ significantly. More patients receiving vinblastine plus cisplatin experienced wbc counts less than 2100/mm3 (P = 0.003). The two regimens demonstrated comparable response and survival data but clinically significant leukopenia was more common in vinblastine-treated patients. There was no difference in response data obtained through the study of patients with measurable and evaluable indicator lesions.

Trial of vindesine plus mitomycin in stage-3 non-small cell lung cancer. An active regimen for outpatient treatment.

Ninety patients with stage-3 non-small cell lung cancer were given vindesine (3 mg/sq m) plus mitomycin (10 mg/sq m). Data on response are available for 84 adequately treated individuals (93 percent). For patients who had received no prior chemotherapy, the rate of major objective response was 36 percent (20/55). For previously treated patients the rate of major response was 17 percent (5/29). The drugs were routinely administered in the outpatient department without difficulty. Moderate or severe myelosuppression, neurotoxic, nephrotoxic, or pulmonary toxic effects, nausea, and vomiting occurred in less than 15 percent of all studied patients. Three-drug extravasation ulcerations occurred in 1,129 administrations of chemotherapy (0.3 percent). There were two treatment-related deaths, one from sepsis and one from the combination of mitomycin-induced pulmonary and renal toxic effects. The combination of vindesine plus mitomycin is an active, well-tolerated outpatient regimen for patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have not previously received chemotherapy. Further trials are warranted to compare this regimen to other active combinations and to use it as a component of a program of treatment using alternating regimens of chemotherapy.