Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Reprod Med ; 43(11): 925-8, 1998 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9839258

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the efficacy of normal saline as a culture medium for the rapid growth and detection of Candida. STUDY DESIGN: During a six-month period in 1995, the authors examined 302 patients with vulvovaginal complaints. A wet smear diagnosis was accomplished in 271 patients; 31 had symptoms suggestive of a Candida infection, which was not confirmed by microscopy. Two patients were excluded, leaving 29 in the study group. Two samples of the vaginal discharge were collected from the vaginal fornices, with one sample placed in a tube of liquid Sabouraud medium and the second placed in a sterile, red-topped tube containing 5 mL of normal saline. Each saline culture was placed in a test tube rack and left to incubate at room temperature. The samples containing the Sabouraud medium were incubated in the hospital microbiology laboratory. Both samples were evaluated microscopically within 24-72 hours to detect the presence or absence of Candida organisms. RESULTS: Of the 29 patients who had symptoms suggestive of Candida, 16 had a confirmed diagnosis of Candida employing both the saline method and Sabouraud medium. Eleven patients were negative for Candida with both the saline and Sabouraud; there was one false positive and one false negative in each group. The positive predictive value of the normal saline culture technique was 94.1%, with a negative predictive value of 91.7%. Sensitivity and specificity were 94.1% and 91.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Using normal saline instead of Sabouraud's medium to culture Candida proved inexpensive, cost-effective and highly accurate for rapid diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal/diagnosis , Culture Media , Mycological Typing Techniques/standards , Sodium Chloride , Vaginal Smears , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Culture Media/economics , Female , Humans , Mycological Typing Techniques/economics , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sodium Chloride/economics
3.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 165(4 Pt 2): 1245-9, 1991 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1951582

ABSTRACT

Cytolytic vaginosis, a not uncommon condition, is frequently misdiagnosed because it is confused with Candida. Many practitioners rely on their clinical judgment alone rather than the use of high-quality microscopes and the results of a wet smear. Compounding the problem of misdiagnosis is that patients assume that their symptoms are caused by a yeast infection, which results in telephone requests for medication from their physicians instead of an office consultation. Cytolytic vaginosis is characterized by pruritus, dyspareunia, vulvar dysuria, and cyclical increase in symptoms more pronounced during the luteal phase. Diagnostic criteria include a high risk of suspicion; the absence of Trichomonas, Gardnerella, or Candida on wet smear; an increased number of lactobacilli; a paucity of white blood cells; evidence of cytolysis; and the presence of discharge; and a pH between 3.5 and 4.5. Treatment entails use of sodium bicarbonate douches.


Subject(s)
Vaginal Diseases/diagnosis , Vaginal Diseases/pathology , Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Lactobacillus/pathogenicity , Leukopenia , Leukorrhea/pathology , Microscopy, Phase-Contrast , Vaginal Diseases/microbiology , Vaginal Smears
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...