Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
1.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 5: CD011703, 2022 05 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35502614

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Drug insurance schemes are systems that provide access to medicines on a prepaid basis and could potentially improve access to essential medicines and reduce out-of-pocket payments for vulnerable populations. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects on drug use, drug expenditure, healthcare utilisation and healthcare outcomes of alternative policies for regulating drug insurance schemes. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, nine other databases, and two trials registers between November 2014 and September 2020, including a citation search for included studies on 15 September 2021 using Web of Science. We screened reference lists of all the relevant reports that we retrieved and reports from the Background section. Authors of relevant papers, relevant organisations, and discussion lists were contacted to identify additional studies, including unpublished and ongoing studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We planned to include randomised trials, non-randomised trials, interrupted time-series studies (including controlled ITS [CITS] and repeated measures [RM] studies), and controlled before-after (CBA) studies. Two review authors independently assessed the search results and reference lists of relevant reports, retrieved the full text of potentially relevant references and independently applied the inclusion criteria to those studies. We resolved disagreements by discussion, and when necessary by including a third review author. We excluded studies of the following pharmaceutical policies covered in other Cochrane Reviews: those that determined how decisions were made about which conditions or drugs were covered; those that placed restrictions on reimbursement for drugs that were covered; and those that regulated out-of-pocket payments for drugs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data from the included studies and assessed risk of bias for each study, with disagreements being resolved by consensus. We used the criteria suggested by  Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC)  to assess the risk of bias of included studies. For randomised trials, non-randomised trials and controlled before-after studies, we planned to report relative effects. For dichotomous outcomes, we reported the risk ratio (RR) when possible and adjusted for baseline differences in the outcome measures. For interrupted time series and controlled interrupted time-series studies, we computed changes along two dimensions: change in level; and change in slope. We undertook a structured synthesis following the EPOC guidance on this topic, describing the range of effects found in the studies for each category of outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 58 studies that met the inclusion criteria (25 interrupted time-series studies and 33 controlled before-after studies). Most of the studies (54) assessed a single policy implemented in the United States (US) healthcare system: Medicare Part D. The other four assessed other drug insurance schemes from Canada and the US, but only one of them provided analysable data for inclusion in the quantitative synthesis. The introduction of drug insurance schemes may increase prescription drug use (low-certainty evidence). On the other hand, Medicare Part D may decrease drug expenditure measured as both out-of-pocket spending and total drug spending (low-certainty evidence). Regarding healthcare utilisation, drug insurance policies (such as Medicare Part D) may lead to a small increase in visits to the emergency department. However, it is uncertain whether this type of policy increases or decreases hospital admissions or outpatient visits by beneficiaries of the scheme because the certainty of the evidence was very low. Likewise, it is uncertain if the policy increases or reduces health outcomes such as mortality because the certainty of the evidence was very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of drug insurance schemes such as Medicare Part D in the US health system may increase prescription drug use and may decrease out-of-pocket payments by the beneficiaries of the scheme and total drug expenditures. It may also lead to a small increase in visits to the emergency department by the beneficiaries of the policy. Its effects on other healthcare utilisation outcomes and on health outcomes are uncertain because of the very low certainty of the evidence. The applicability of this evidence to settings outside US healthcare is limited.


Subject(s)
Drug and Narcotic Control , Prescription Drugs , Aged , Health Expenditures , Humans , Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services , National Health Programs
2.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 45: e95, 2021.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34621301

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of household out-of-pocket health spending, financial protection levels, and their inequality according to relevant variables in the countries of the Region; to investigate their evolution and relationship with health system services utilization. METHODS: Comparative descriptive information was compiled on out-of-pocket spending, its incidence in the population, and its weight and contribution to household consumption. Financial protection indicators for the national level and their distribution by quintiles of total household consumption and by gender are presented, and compared to an indicator of service coverage. RESULTS: Out-of-pocket spending and financial protection indicators are deficient but demonstrate differences among countries. The composition of health expenditure is identified for a subset of countries and significant gradients are seen when inequalities are studied. Changes over time and possible associations with service coverage levels are shown for several cases. DISCUSSION: Lack of financial protection affects a large part of the population. Additionally, there are groups of countries with greater difficulties than others, where a preponderance of spending is on medicines, and there is greater exposure of groups in conditions of vulnerability, such as the poorest and women, indicating great inequity. Policies of some countries that can be associated with improvement in financial protection are identified. To replace out-of-pocket spending, which is a barrier to access, countries need to increase public spending by financing health systems undergoing transformation toward universal health.


OBJETIVO: Determinar o impacto dos gastos diretos em saúde nas famílias, os níveis de proteção financeira e sua desigualdade, de acordo com variáveis relevantes nos países da Região; investigar sua evolução e sua relação com a utilização dos serviços do sistema de saúde. MÉTODOS: Foram coletadas informações descritivas comparativas sobre gastos diretos em saúde, sua incidência na população e seu peso e composição no consumo familiar. Os indicadores de proteção financeira são apresentados em nível nacional, estratificados por quintis de consumo total das famílias e por gênero, e são comparados com um indicador de cobertura de serviço. RESULTADOS: Os indicadores de gastos diretos e proteção financeira são limitados, mas demonstram diferenças entre os países. Foi possível identificar a composição dos gastos com saúde para um subgrupo deles, observando-se gradientes significativos quando as desigualdades são estudadas. Em alguns casos, observam-se também mudanças ao longo do tempo e possíveis associações com os níveis de cobertura de serviço. DISCUSSÃO: A falta de proteção financeira atinge grande parte da população. Foram observados grupos de países com mais dificuldades do que outros, com preponderância de gastos com medicamentos e maior exposição de grupos em situação de vulnerabilidade, como os mais pobres e as mulheres, o que denota alto nível de iniquidade. Em alguns países foram identificadas políticas que podem estar associadas à evolução da proteção financeira. Para substituir os gastos diretos, que constituem uma barreira ao acesso, os países precisam aumentar o gasto público, financiando os sistemas de saúde numa transformação rumo à saúde universal.

3.
Article in Spanish | PAHO-IRIS | ID: phr-54836

ABSTRACT

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Determinar el impacto del gasto de bolsillo en salud en los hogares, los niveles de protección financiera y su desigualdad según variables relevantes en países de la Región. Se indaga su evolución y relación con el uso de servicios del sistema de salud. Métodos. Se recopila información descriptiva comparada acerca del gasto de bolsillo, su incidencia en la población, y su peso y composición en el consumo de los hogares. Se presentan indicadores de protección financiera en el nivel nacional y su distribución por quintiles de consumo total de hogares y por género. Se contrastan con un indicador de cobertura de servicios. Resultados. Los indicadores de gasto de bolsillo y protección financiera son deficientes pero diferenciados entre los países. Se identifica la composición del gasto en salud para un subgrupo de ellos y existen gradientes significativos cuando se estudian las desigualdades. Para algunos casos, se muestran cambios en el tiempo y posibles asociaciones con los niveles de cobertura de servicios. Discusión. La desprotección financiera afecta a una gran parte de la población, se configuran grupos de países con dificultades mayores que otros, con preponderancia de gasto en medicamentos y exposición mayor de grupos en situaciones de vulnerabilidad, como los más pobres y las mujeres, lo que denota una gran inequidad. Se identifican políticas de algunos países que pueden asociarse con la evolución de la protección financiera. Para reemplazar el gasto de bolsillo, barrera para el acceso, los países necesitan aumentar el gasto público mediante el financiamiento de los sistemas de salud en transformación hacia la salud universal.


[ABSTRACT]. Objective. To determine the impact of household out-of-pocket health spending, financial protection levels, and their inequality according to relevant variables in the countries of the Region; to investigate their evolution and relationship with health system services utilization. Methods. Comparative descriptive information was compiled on out-of-pocket spending, its incidence in the population, and its weight and contribution to household consumption. Financial protection indicators for the national level and their distribution by quintiles of total household consumption and by gender are presented, and compared to an indicator of service coverage. Results. Out-of-pocket spending and financial protection indicators are deficient but demonstrate differences among countries. The composition of health expenditure is identified for a subset of countries and significant gradients are seen when inequalities are studied. Changes over time and possible associations with service coverage levels are shown for several cases. Discussion. Lack of financial protection affects a large part of the population. Additionally, there are groups of countries with greater difficulties than others, where a preponderance of spending is on medicines, and there is greater exposure of groups in conditions of vulnerability, such as the poorest and women, indicating great inequity. Policies of some countries that can be associated with improvement in financial protection are identified. To replace out-of-pocket spending, which is a barrier to access, countries need to increase public spending by financing health systems undergoing transformation toward universal health.


[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Determinar o impacto dos gastos diretos em saúde nas famílias, os níveis de proteção financeira e sua desigualdade, de acordo com variáveis relevantes nos países da Região; investigar sua evolução e sua relação com a utilização dos serviços do sistema de saúde. Métodos. Foram coletadas informações descritivas comparativas sobre gastos diretos em saúde, sua incidência na população e seu peso e composição no consumo familiar. Os indicadores de proteção financeira são apresentados em nível nacional, estratificados por quintis de consumo total das famílias e por gênero, e são comparados com um indicador de cobertura de serviço. Resultados. Os indicadores de gastos diretos e proteção financeira são limitados, mas demonstram diferenças entre os países. Foi possível identificar a composição dos gastos com saúde para um subgrupo deles, observando-se gradientes significativos quando as desigualdades são estudadas. Em alguns casos, observam-se também mudanças ao longo do tempo e possíveis associações com os níveis de cobertura de serviço. Discussão. A falta de proteção financeira atinge grande parte da população. Foram observados grupos de países com mais dificuldades do que outros, com preponderância de gastos com medicamentos e maior exposição de grupos em situação de vulnerabilidade, como os mais pobres e as mulheres, o que denota alto nível de iniquidade. Em alguns países foram identificadas políticas que podem estar associadas à evolução da proteção financeira. Para substituir os gastos diretos, que constituem uma barreira ao acesso, os países precisam aumentar o gasto público, financiando os sistemas de saúde numa transformação rumo à saúde universal.


Subject(s)
Health Expenditures , Financial Risk Protection , Catastrophic Health Expenditure , Impoverishing Health Expenditure , Healthcare Financing , Cost Control , Financial Risk Protection , Catastrophic Health Expenditure , Impoverishing Health Expenditure , Healthcare Financing , Cost Control , Financial Risk Protection , Catastrophic Health Expenditure , Impoverishing Health Expenditure , Healthcare Financing
5.
Health Policy ; 123(7): 621-629, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31151828

ABSTRACT

In the path to universal health coverage, policymakers discuss different alternative health system's financing schemes. Classical typologies have been posited, including models such as National Health Service, Social Health Insurance and Private Health Insurance. More recently, National Health Insurance (NHI) has been suggested as a separate model. Nevertheless, there are discrepancies regarding what defines an NHI model. The purpose of this article is to propose a comprehensive definition of an NHI model, aimed to disentangle the current discrepancies in the conceptualization and the scope of this type of arrangement. Based on the previous literature we identified some common characteristics across NHI definitions, namely universal coverage, pooling in a single fund and a purchasing function based on a single-payer financing mechanism. Areas of controversy were also identified. While some authors emphasized the importance of an effective separation between the purchaser and provider functions, others highlighted the relative importance of privately-owned provision to define a system like NHI-type. Based on empirical data, we suggest that the ownership is not a critical variable to distinguish an NHI from other models, and instead, suggest that a pivotal characteristic of the NHI is the single payer mechanism that is not integrated with the health providers.


Subject(s)
National Health Programs/classification , Universal Health Insurance , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Healthcare Financing , Humans , National Health Programs/economics , Single-Payer System
6.
Article in Spanish | HISA - History of Health | ID: his-42844

ABSTRACT

Frente al consenso por superar en Chile las deficiencias de un sistema de salud segmentado por riesgos e ingresos, la Comisión Presidencial encargada en 2014 planteó soluciones para dos esce-narios. Para el largo plazo propuso un seguro público único. En lo inmediato, propuso regular a las ISAPRE para que funcionaran bajo reglas y principios de seguridad social3. Estas regulaciones sentarían las bases para las transformaciones de más largo plazo. En esencia, la Comisión cuestiono que la estrategia centrada en promover mayor competencia y libertad de elección en mercados de seguros de salud individuales diera buenos resultados. Muy por el contrario, sugirió que, para avanzar hacia el acceso equitativo a la salud, es necesario poner en el centro el derecho a la salud y los principios de solidaridad y equidad. Cuestión que requiere de una regulación más elaborada que la actual.Muchos otros países enfrentan problemas de segmentación en el acceso a servicios de salud.; y la ex-periencia chilena se observa con detención. Para sociedades desiguales como la chilena, la solución es la de incorporar solidaridad en el financiamiento. Es la única forma de evitar que la capacidad de pago o el estado de salud (prexistencias) sean los determinantes de dicho acceso. (AU)


Subject(s)
Health Systems , Health Care Reform , Social Security
7.
Article in Spanish | PAHO-IRIS | ID: phr-34509

ABSTRACT

[RESUMEN]. Chile mantiene un sistema de salud segmentado por riesgos e ingresos. Una Comisión Presidencial encargada en 2014 planteó dos escenarios para el sistema de salud según el horizonte de tiempo en que se esperaban sus resultados. Para el largo plazo propuso una visión hacia dónde debiera dirigirse el sistema de salud chileno, conviniendo en un seguro público único. En lo inmediato, propuso una transición que consistía en regular a las instituciones de salud previsional para que funcionaran bajo reglas y principios de seguridad social. Los planteamientos centrales se sustentaron en evidencia internacional de sistemas que han alcanzado éxito en ofrecer acceso y cobertura universal de salud a sus habitantes, mediante las transformaciones y regulaciones apropiadas. El análisis realizado por la Comisión implicó la inauguración de un nuevo paradigma para las políticas de salud en Chile. Uno que señala que la estrategia utilizada hasta ese momento, de promover mayor competencia y libertad de elección en mercados de seguros de salud, no ha dado resultados, y que para avanzar hacia el acceso equitativo a la salud es necesario poner en el centro el derecho a la salud y los principios de solidaridad y equidad, así como valorar el avance en el mundo, reconociendo que el esquema chileno se aleja de las mejores prácticas en cuanto a diseño de los sistemas de salud. La propuesta no se ha implementado aún, y será necesario plantear una implementación acelerada de la visión de largo plazo. La experiencia es relevante para otros países de la Región de las Américas que discuten los problemas de la segmentación en salud.


[ABSTRACT]. Chile maintains a health system segmented by risks and income. A Presidential Commission convened in 2014 presented two scenarios for its health system in accordance with a timeline of expected results. For the long term, it proposed a vision for the direction of the Chilean health system that would converge in a single public insurance. For the short term, it proposed a transition that consisted of regulating pension health institutions to function under social security rules and principles. The central approaches were based on international evidence of systems that have achieved success in offering universal health access and coverage to the population, through appropriate transformations and regulations. The analysis carried out by the Commission signaled the beginning of a new paradigm for health policies in Chile. This points out that the strategy used previously—to promote greater competition and freedom of choice in health insurance markets—has not yielded results, and that in order to advance towards equitable access to health it is necessary to focus on the right to health and the principles of solidarity and equity, as well as assessing progress in the world, recognizing that the Chilean scheme moves away from the best practices in terms of the design of health systems. The proposal has not been implemented yet, and it will be necessary to propose an accelerated implementation plan for its longterm vision. Chile’s experience is relevant for other countries in the Region of the Americas that discuss the problems of health segmentation.


[RESUMO]. O Chile mantém um sistema de saúde segmentado por riscos e renda. Uma Comissão Presidencial delegada em 2014 propôs dois cenários para o sistema de saúde de acordo com o horizonte temporal em que seus resultados eram esperados. Para o longo prazo, foi indicadauma visão de onde o sistema de saúde chileno deveria chegar, concordando com um único seguro de saúde público. De forma imediata, foi recomendada uma transição que consiste em regular as instituições de seguro de saúde para funcionar de acordo com as regras e princípios de seguridade social. As abordagens centrais foram baseadas em evidências internacionais de sistemas que alcançaram sucesso em oferecer acesso e cobertura de saúde universal aos seus habitantes, através de transformações e regulamentos adequados. A análise realizada pela Comissão envolveu a inauguração de um novo paradigma para as políticas de saúde no Chile. Uma sinalização foi sobre a estratégia utilizada até esse momento, de promover uma maior concorrência e liberdade de escolha nos mercados de seguros de saúde, não tem produzido resultados, e que, para avançar ao acesso equitativo à saúde, é necessário colocar no centro da estratégia o direito à saúde e os princípios de solidariedade e equidade, bem como avaliar o progresso no mundo, reconhecendo que o esquema chileno se afasta das melhores práticas em termos de projetar sistemas de saúde. A proposta não foi implementada até o momento, e será necessário propor uma implementação acelerada da visão de longo prazo. A experiência é relevante para outros países da Região das Américas que discutem os problemas de segmentação da saúde.


Subject(s)
Health Care Reform , Health Systems , Insurance, Health , Social Security , Chile , Health Care Reform , Health Systems , Insurance, Health , Social Security , Social Security , Health Care Reform , Health Systems , Insurance, Health
8.
Article in Spanish | PAHO-IRIS | ID: phr-34450

ABSTRACT

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Analizar la sostenibilidad y la integración de los programas prioritarios en el marco de la Estrategia para el acceso universal a la salud y la cobertura universal de salud (Salud Universal) de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud de 2014. Métodos. Se llevó a cabo una revisión no sistemática de la bibliografía reciente enfocada al análisis de la integración y la sostenibilidad. Resultados. El principal resultado que se extrae de la bibliografía revisada es la necesidad de abordar la sostenibilidad de tal modo que se superen los límites de cualquier análisis restringido a la sostenibilidad financiera. Aunque la integración y la sostenibilidad no se interpretan de forma homogénea, sobresale un abordaje que contempla la integración como un factor facilitador del proceso de sostenibilidad del PAI. Conclusiones. La efectividad de las estrategias de integración del PAI depende en buena medida de que se consideren la presencia, el fortalecimiento y la transformación de las estructuras organizativas e institucionales que faciliten la participación de los actores con capacidad técnica y política para garantizar sus procesos de implementación. De esta forma, se podrán ponderar los procesos políticos que legitiman una agenda de inclusión del PAI en la Estrategia de salud universal y, por tanto, como parte integrante del fortalecimiento de los sistemas de salud.


[ABSTRACT]. Objective. Analyze the sustainability and integration of priority programs in the framework of the Pan American Health Organization’s 2014 Strategy for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage (Universal Health). Methods. A non-systematic review was carried out of the recent literature focused on analysis of integration and sustainability. Results. The main result extracted from the literature review is the need to address sustainability in a way that goes beyond the limits of any analysis restricted to financial sustainability. Although integration and sustainability are not interpreted uniformly, an approach that includes integration as a facilitating factor of the EPI sustainability process does stand out. Conclusions. Effectiveness of EPI integration strategies depends to a large extent on considering the presence, strengthening, and transformation of organizational and institutional structures that facilitate the participation of actors with the technical and political ability to ensure its implementation processes. Thus, political processes can be weighed that legitimize an agenda to include EPI in the Universal Health strategy and, accordingly, as an integral part of health systems strengthening.


[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Avaliar a sustentabilidade e a integração do Programa ampliado de imunização (PAI) como parte da estratégia de acesso universal à saúde e cobertura universal de saúde da Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS) de 2014. Métodos. Uma revisão não sistemática da literatura científica recente foi realizada dando enfoque à análise da integração e sustentabilidade do PAI. Resultados. O principal achado é a necessidade de contemplar a sustentabilidade além da análise de sustentabilidade financeira. Embora a integração e a sustentabilidade não sejam interpretadas de forma homogênea na literatura, são destacadas as virtudes de uma abordagem que conceba a integração como um fator facilitador do processo de sustentabilidade do PAI. Conclusões. A efetividade das estratégias de integração do PAI depende em grande parte da existência, fortalecimento e transformação das estruturas organizacionais e institucionais facilitando a participação dos interessados com capacidade técnica e política para garantir os processos de implementação. Desse modo, será possível examinar com atenção os processos políticos que legitimam a agenda de inclusão do PAI na estratégia de saúde universal e, portanto, como parte integrante do fortalecimento dos sistemas de saúde.


Subject(s)
Systems Integration , Universal Access to Health Care Services , Health Systems , Systems Integration , Universal Access to Health Care Services , Health Systems , Systems Integration , Universal Access to Health Care Services , Health Systems
9.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 41: e160, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31391842

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Analizar la sostenibilidad y la integración de los programas prioritarios en el marco de la Estrategia para el acceso universal a la salud y la cobertura universal de salud (Salud Universal) de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud de 2014. MÉTODOS: Se llevó a cabo una revisión no sistemática de la bibliografía reciente enfocada al análisis de la integración y la sostenibilidad. RESULTADOS: El principal resultado que se extrae de la bibliografía revisada es la necesidad de abordar la sostenibilidad de tal modo que se superen los límites de cualquier análisis restringido a la sostenibilidad financiera. Aunque la integración y la sostenibilidad no se interpretan de forma homogénea, sobresale un abordaje que contempla la integración como un factor facilitador del proceso de sostenibilidad del PAI. CONCLUSIONES: La efectividad de las estrategias de integración del PAI depende en buena medida de que se consideren la presencia, el fortalecimiento y la transformación de las estructuras organizativas e institucionales que faciliten la participación de los actores con capacidad técnica y política para garantizar sus procesos de implementación. De esta forma, se podrán ponderar los procesos políticos que legitiman una agenda de inclusión del PAI en la Estrategia de salud universal y, por tanto, como parte integrante del fortalecimiento de los sistemas de salud.

10.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 41: e170, 2017.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31391845

ABSTRACT

Chile maintains a health system segmented by risks and income. A Presidential Commission convened in 2014 presented two scenarios for its health system in accordance with a timeline of expected results. For the long term, it proposed a vision for the direction of the Chilean health system that would converge in a single public insurance. For the short term, it proposed a transition that consisted of regulating pension health institutions to function under social security rules and principles. The central approaches were based on international evidence of systems that have achieved success in offering universal health access and coverage to the population, through appropriate transformations and regulations. The analysis carried out by the Commission signaled the beginning of a new paradigm for health policies in Chile. This points out that the strategy used previously-to promote greater competition and freedom of choice in health insurance markets-has not yielded results, and that in order to advance towards equitable access to health it is necessary to focus on the right to health and the principles of solidarity and equity, as well as assessing progress in the world, recognizing that the Chilean scheme moves away from the best practices in terms of the design of health systems. The proposal has not been implemented yet, and it will be necessary to propose an accelerated implementation plan for its longterm vision. Chile's experience is relevant for other countries in the Region of the Americas that discuss the problems of health segmentation.


O Chile mantém um sistema de saúde segmentado por riscos e renda. Uma Comissão Presidencial delegada em 2014 propôs dois cenários para o sistema de saúde de acordo com o horizonte temporal em que seus resultados eram esperados. Para o longo prazo, foi indicadauma visão de onde o sistema de saúde chileno deveria chegar, concordando com um único seguro de saúde público. De forma imediata, foi recomendada uma transição que consiste em regular as instituições de seguro de saúde para funcionar de acordo com as regras e princípios de seguridade social. As abordagens centrais foram baseadas em evidências internacionais de sistemas que alcançaram sucesso em oferecer acesso e cobertura de saúde universal aos seus habitantes, através de transformações e regulamentos adequados. A análise realizada pela Comissão envolveu a inauguração de um novo paradigma para as políticas de saúde no Chile. Uma sinalização foi sobre a estratégia utilizada até esse momento, de promover uma maior concorrência e liberdade de escolha nos mercados de seguros de saúde, não tem produzido resultados, e que, para avançar ao acesso equitativo à saúde, é necessário colocar no centro da estratégia o direito à saúde e os princípios de solidariedade e equidade, bem como avaliar o progresso no mundo, reconhecendo que o esquema chileno se afasta das melhores práticas em termos de projetar sistemas de saúde. A proposta não foi implementada até o momento, e será necessário propor uma implementação acelerada da visão de longo prazo. A experiência é relevante para outros países da Região das Américas que discutem os problemas de segmentação da saúde.

11.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 41: e160, 2017. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-961663

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Objetivo Analizar la sostenibilidad y la integración de los programas prioritarios en el marco de la Estrategia para el acceso universal a la salud y la cobertura universal de salud (Salud Universal) de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud de 2014. Métodos Se llevó a cabo una revisión no sistemática de la bibliografía reciente enfocada al análisis de la integración y la sostenibilidad. Resultados El principal resultado que se extrae de la bibliografía revisada es la necesidad de abordar la sostenibilidad de tal modo que se superen los límites de cualquier análisis restringido a la sostenibilidad financiera. Aunque la integración y la sostenibilidad no se interpretan de forma homogénea, sobresale un abordaje que contempla la integración como un factor facilitador del proceso de sostenibilidad del PAI. Conclusiones La efectividad de las estrategias de integración del PAI depende en buena medida de que se consideren la presencia, el fortalecimiento y la transformación de las estructuras organizativas e institucionales que faciliten la participación de los actores con capacidad técnica y política para garantizar sus procesos de implementación. De esta forma, se podrán ponderar los procesos políticos que legitiman una agenda de inclusión del PAI en la Estrategia de salud universal y, por tanto, como parte integrante del fortalecimiento de los sistemas de salud.


ABSTRACT Objective Analyze the sustainability and integration of priority programs in the framework of the Pan American Health Organization's 2014 Strategy for Universal Access to Health and Universal Health Coverage (Universal Health). Methods A non-systematic review was carried out of the recent literature focused on analysis of integration and sustainability. Results The main result extracted from the literature review is the need to address sustainability in a way that goes beyond the limits of any analysis restricted to financial sustainability. Although integration and sustainability are not interpreted uniformly, an approach that includes integration as a facilitating factor of the EPI sustainability process does stand out. Conclusions Effectiveness of EPI integration strategies depends to a large extent on considering the presence, strengthening, and transformation of organizational and institutional structures that facilitate the participation of actors with the technical and political ability to ensure its implementation processes. Thus, political processes can be weighed that legitimize an agenda to include EPI in the Universal Health strategy and, accordingly, as an integral part of health systems strengthening.


RESUMO Objetivo Avaliar a sustentabilidade e a integração do Programa ampliado de imunização (PAI) como parte da estratégia de acesso universal à saúde e cobertura universal de saúde da Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS) de 2014. Métodos Uma revisão não sistemática da literatura científica recente foi realizada dando enfoque à análise da integração e sustentabilidade do PAI. Resultados O principal achado é a necessidade de contemplar a sustentabilidade além da análise de sustentabilidade financeira. Embora a integração e a sustentabilidade não sejam interpretadas de forma homogênea na literatura, são destacadas as virtudes de uma abordagem que conceba a integração como um fator facilitador do processo de sustentabilidade do PAI. Conclusões A efetividade das estratégias de integração do PAI depende em grande parte da existência, fortalecimento e transformação das estruturas organizacionais e institucionais facilitando a participação dos interessados com capacidade técnica e política para garantir os processos de implementação. Desse modo, será possível examinar com atenção os processos políticos que legitimam a agenda de inclusão do PAI na estratégia de saúde universal e, portanto, como parte integrante do fortalecimento dos sistemas de saúde.


Subject(s)
Health Systems/organization & administration , Systems Integration , Universal Access to Health Care Services
12.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 41: e170, 2017. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1043210

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Chile mantiene un sistema de salud segmentado por riesgos e ingresos. Una Comisión Presidencial encargada en 2014 planteó dos escenarios para el sistema de salud según el horizonte de tiempo en que se esperaban sus resultados. Para el largo plazo propuso una visión hacia dónde debiera dirigirse el sistema de salud chileno, conviniendo en un seguro público único. En lo inmediato, propuso una transición que consistía en regular a las instituciones de salud previsional para que funcionaran bajo reglas y principios de seguridad social. Los planteamientos centrales se sustentaron en evidencia internacional de sistemas que han alcanzado éxito en ofrecer acceso y cobertura universal de salud a sus habitantes, mediante las transformaciones y regulaciones apropiadas. El análisis realizado por la Comisión implicó la inauguración de un nuevo paradigma para las políticas de salud en Chile. Uno que señala que la estrategia utilizada hasta ese momento, de promover mayor competencia y libertad de elección en mercados de seguros de salud, no ha dado resultados, y que para avanzar hacia el acceso equitativo a la salud es necesario poner en el centro el derecho a la salud y los principios de solidaridad y equidad, así como valorar el avance en el mundo, reconociendo que el esquema chileno se aleja de las mejores prácticas en cuanto a diseño de los sistemas de salud. La propuesta no se ha implementado aún, y será necesario plantear una implementación acelerada de la visión de largo plazo. La experiencia es relevante para otros países de la Región de las Américas que discuten los problemas de la segmentación en salud.(AU)


ABSTRACT Chile maintains a health system segmented by risks and income. A Presidential Commission convened in 2014 presented two scenarios for its health system in accordance with a timeline of expected results. For the long term, it proposed a vision for the direction of the Chilean health system that would converge in a single public insurance. For the short term, it proposed a transition that consisted of regulating pension health institutions to function under social security rules and principles. The central approaches were based on international evidence of systems that have achieved success in offering universal health access and coverage to the population, through appropriate transformations and regulations. The analysis carried out by the Commission signaled the beginning of a new paradigm for health policies in Chile. This points out that the strategy used previously—to promote greater competition and freedom of choice in health insurance markets—has not yielded results, and that in order to advance towards equitable access to health it is necessary to focus on the right to health and the principles of solidarity and equity, as well as assessing progress in the world, recognizing that the Chilean scheme moves away from the best practices in terms of the design of health systems. The proposal has not been implemented yet, and it will be necessary to propose an accelerated implementation plan for its longterm vision. Chile's experience is relevant for other countries in the Region of the Americas that discuss the problems of health segmentation.(AU)


RESUMO O Chile mantém um sistema de saúde segmentado por riscos e renda. Uma Comissão Presidencial delegada em 2014 propôs dois cenários para o sistema de saúde de acordo com o horizonte temporal em que seus resultados eram esperados. Para o longo prazo, foi indicadauma visão de onde o sistema de saúde chileno deveria chegar, concordando com um único seguro de saúde público. De forma imediata, foi recomendada uma transição que consiste em regular as instituições de seguro de saúde para funcionar de acordo com as regras e princípios de seguridade social. As abordagens centrais foram baseadas em evidências internacionais de sistemas que alcançaram sucesso em oferecer acesso e cobertura de saúde universal aos seus habitantes, através de transformações e regulamentos adequados. A análise realizada pela Comissão envolveu a inauguração de um novo paradigma para as políticas de saúde no Chile. Uma sinalização foi sobre a estratégia utilizada até esse momento, de promover uma maior concorrência e liberdade de escolha nos mercados de seguros de saúde, não tem produzido resultados, e que, para avançar ao acesso equitativo à saúde, é necessário colocar no centro da estratégia o direito à saúde e os princípios de solidariedade e equidade, bem como avaliar o progresso no mundo, reconhecendo que o esquema chileno se afasta das melhores práticas em termos de projetar sistemas de saúde. A proposta não foi implementada até o momento, e será necessário propor uma implementação acelerada da visão de longo prazo. A experiência é relevante para outros países da Região das Américas que discutem os problemas de segmentação da saúde.(AU)


Subject(s)
Social Security/organization & administration , Health Systems/organization & administration , Health Care Reform/trends , Insurance, Health/organization & administration , Chile , Health Policy
14.
Salud Publica Mex ; 58(5): 553-560, 2016.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27991986

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:: To analyze the differences in health outcomes by hospital characteristics, focusing on ownership: public, private not-for-profit (PNFP) and private for-profit (PFP). MATERIALS AND METHODS:: We used a discharged patient dataset of Chilean hospitals for the period 2001-2010 with a total of 16 205 314 discharges in 20 public, six PNFP and 15 PFP hospitals.We selected a subsample of two medical conditions: myocardial infarction and stroke.We used probit regression analyses with mortality rates as dependent variable, ownership status as the key explanatory variable, and control variables which included patients' health status and socioeconomic level, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS:: Private hospitals showed lower risk of death relative to public hospitals: 1.3% in PNFP, 0.7% in PFP and 3.5% in public hospitals. CONCLUSIONS:: The analysis shows the inequities that exist between public hospitals and the private sector.


Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, Private/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Public/statistics & numerical data , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Stroke/mortality , Adult , Aged , Chile/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Insurance Coverage , Male , Middle Aged , Ownership , Risk , Socioeconomic Factors , Survival Rate
15.
Salud pública Méx ; 58(5): 553-560, sep.-oct. 2016. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-830832

ABSTRACT

Resumen: Objetivo: Analizar las diferencias en los resultados en salud según condiciones observadas de los hospitales, en particular su tipo de propiedad: hospitales públicos, privados sin fines de lucro (PSL) y privados con fines de lucro (PCL). Material y métodos: Se utilizó información de egresos hospitalarios en Chile entre 2001 y 2010 con un total de 16 205 314 altas de 20 hospitales públicos, 6 de PSL y 15 de PCL. Se seleccionó una muestra de pacientes con infarto al miocardio (IAM) y accidente cerebrovascular (ACV). Se estimó una regresión probit utilizando como variable dependiente la mortalidad intrahospitalaria y controlando por variables como estado de salud, nivel socioeconómico y características del hospital. Resultados: Los hospitales privados tienen menor riesgo de mortalidad intrahospitalaria: 1.3% en PSL y 0.7% en PCL, mientras que en los hospitales públicos el riesgo llega a 3.5%. Conclusiones: Este análisis muestra las inequidades que el sector público tiene respecto de los demás sectores.


Abstract: Objective: To analyze the differences in health outcomes by hospital characteristics, focusing on ownership: public, private not-for-profit (PNFP) and private for-profit (PFP). Materials and methods: We used a discharged patient dataset of Chilean hospitals for the period 2001-2010 with a total of 16 205 314 discharges in 20 public, six PNFP and 15 PFP hospitals.We selected a subsample of two medical conditions: myocardial infarction and stroke.We used probit regression analyses with mortality rates as dependent variable, ownership status as the key explanatory variable, and control variables which included patients' health status and socioeconomic level, and hospital characteristics. Results: Private hospitals showed lower risk of death relative to public hospitals: 1.3% in PNFP, 0.7% in PFP and 3.5% in public hospitals. Conclusions: The analysis shows the inequities that exist between public hospitals and the private sector.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Hospitals, Private/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality , Stroke/mortality , Healthcare Disparities , Hospitals, Public/statistics & numerical data , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Ownership , Socioeconomic Factors , Chile/epidemiology , Risk , Survival Rate , Insurance Coverage
16.
Medwave ; 16(7): e6509, 2016 Aug 02.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27532152

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This paper aims to determine the economic impact that cancer represents to Chile, exploring the share of costs for the most important cancers and the differences between the public and private sector. METHODS: We used the cost of illness methodology, through the assessment of the direct and indirect costs associated with cancer treatment. Data was obtained from 2009 registries of the Chilean Ministry of Health and the Superintendence of Health. Indirect costs were calculated by days of job absenteeism and potential years of life lost. RESULTS: Over US$ 2.1 billion were spent on cancer in 2009, which represents almost 1% of Chile’s Gross Domestic Product. The direct per capita cost was US$ 47. Indirect costs were 1.92 times more than direct costs. The three types of cancer that embody the highest share of costs were gastric cancer (17.6%), breast cancer (7%) and prostate cancer (4.2%) in the public sector, and breast cancer (14%), lung cancer (7.5%) and prostate cancer (4.1%) in the private sector. On average men spent 30.33% more than women. CONCLUSION: There are few studies of this kind in Chile and the region. The country can be classified as having a cancer economic impact below the average of those in European Union countries. We expect that this information can be used to develop access policies and resource allocation decision making, and as a first step into further cancer-costing studies in Chile and the Latin American and Caribbean region.


OBJETIVO: Este trabajo pretende determinar el impacto económico del cáncer en Chile, junto con estimar la proporción del costo total atribuible a los principales tipos de cáncer y su distribución entre el sector de aseguramiento público y privado de salud. MÉTODOS: Se utilizó la metodología de costo de enfermedad, a través de la valoración de los costos directos e indirectos asociados al cáncer usando datos del Ministerio de Salud y de la Superintendencia de Salud del Chile para el año 2009. Los costos indirectos fueron calculados considerando los días de ausentismo laboral y los años de vida potencialmente perdidos. RESULTADOS: Más de 2100 millones de dólares al año es el impacto económico del cáncer en Chile, lo que representa casi el 1% del Producto Interno Bruto del país. El gasto directo per cápita fue de 47 dólares. Los costos indirectos fueron 1,92 veces mayores que los directos. Los tres tipos de cáncer de mayor impacto en los costos son: estómago (17,6%), mama (7%) y próstata (4,2%) en el sector público; y mama (14%), pulmón (7,5%) y próstata (4,1%) en el privado. Los hombres gastaron en promedio 30,33% más que las mujeres. CONCLUSIÓN: Existen pocos estudios de este tipo en Chile y la región de América Latina y El Caribe, para cáncer u otras enfermedades crónicas. El país puede ser clasificado por debajo del promedio de los costos por cáncer que muestran países de la Unión Europea. Se espera que esta información contribuya a la formulación de políticas de acceso, y que incentive más investigaciones de este tipo en Latinoamérica y El Caribe.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/economics , Absenteeism , Chile/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/therapy , Private Sector/economics , Public Sector/economics , Registries , Sex Factors
17.
Biol Res ; 48: 10, 2015 Jan 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25761441

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The South American country Chile now boasts a life expectancy of over 80 years. As a consequence, Chile now faces the increasing social and economic burden of cancer and must implement political policy to deliver equitable cancer care. Hindering the development of a national cancer policy is the lack of comprehensive analysis of cancer infrastructure and economic impact. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate existing cancer policy, the extent of national investigation and the socio-economic impact of cancer to deliver guidelines for the framing of an equitable national cancer policy. METHODS: Burden, research and care-policy systems were assessed by triangulating objective system metrics--epidemiological, economic, etc.--with political and policy analysis. Analysis of the literature and governmental databases was performed. The oncology community was interviewed and surveyed. RESULTS: Chile utilizes 1% of its gross domestic product on cancer care and treatment. We estimate that the economic impact as measured in Disability Adjusted Life Years to be US$ 3.5 billion. Persistent inequalities still occur in cancer distribution and treatment. A high quality cancer research community is expanding, however, insufficient funding is directed towards disproportionally prevalent stomach, lung and gallbladder cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Chile has a rapidly ageing population wherein 40% smoke, 67% are overweight and 18% abuse alcohol, and thus the corresponding burden of cancer will have a negative impact on an affordable health care system. We conclude that the Chilean government must develop a national cancer strategy, which the authors outline herein and believe is essential to permit equitable cancer care for the country.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/economics , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Health Policy/economics , Life Expectancy , Neoplasms/economics , Biomedical Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Biomedical Research/trends , Chile/epidemiology , Clinical Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Gross Domestic Product , Health Care Reform/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Transition , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Humans , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workforce
18.
Biol. Res ; 48: 1-10, 2015. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-950774

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The South American country Chile now boasts a life expectancy of over 80 years. As a consequence, Chile now faces the increasing social and economic burden of cancer and must implement political policy to deliver equitable cancer care. Hindering the development of a national cancer policy is the lack of comprehensive analysis of cancer infrastructure and economic impact. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate existing cancer policy, the extent of national investigation and the socio-economic impact of cancer to deliver guidelines for the framing of an equitable national cancer policy. METHODS: Burden, research and care-policy systems were assessed by triangulating objective system metrics -epidemiological, economic, etc. - with political and policy analysis. Analysis of the literature and governmental databases was performed. The oncology community was interviewed and surveyed. RESULTS: Chile utilizes 1% of its gross domestic product on cancer care and treatment. We estimate that the economic impact as measured in Disability Adjusted Life Years to be US$ 3.5 billion. Persistent inequalities still occur in cancer distribution and treatment. A high quality cancer research community is expanding, however, insufficient funding is directed towards disproportionally prevalent stomach, lung and gallbladder cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Chile has a rapidly ageing population wherein 40% smoke, 67% are overweight and 18% abuse alcohol, and thus the corresponding burden of cancer will have a negative impact on an affordable health care system. We conclude that the Chilean government must develop a national cancer strategy, which the authors outline herein and believe is essential to permit equitable cancer care for the country.


Subject(s)
Humans , Life Expectancy , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Biomedical Research/economics , Health Policy/economics , Neoplasms/economics , Socioeconomic Factors , Chile/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Risk Factors , Clinical Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Reform/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Health Transition , Biomedical Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Biomedical Research/trends , Workforce , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Gross Domestic Product , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology
20.
Cuad. méd.-soc. (Santiago de Chile) ; 48(1): 13-23, mar. 2008. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-589273

ABSTRACT

Este trabajo intenta caracterizar de los problemas que contienen los incentivos, principalmente aquellos contenidos en los mecanismos de transferencia usados en Chile, que no se encuentran a la altura de los desafíos de la actual reforma, por lo que se requiere entrar en una fase de modificación importante. A la vez, se describe evidencia empírica que muestra efectos indeseados sobre la producción de prestaciones a nivel global, desde hace algunos años y desde 2005, con la implementación de la reforma y la introducción de las GES, asociados a los mecanismos de pago. Esto es, disminución general de la actividad del SNSS, aumento de las urgencias y de la compra externa tanto vía MLE como GES. La disminución de la actividad general del SNSS no implica una caída en la productividad ya que se produce un cambio en el case-mix de producción del sistema, incentivado por las GES y sus compromisos asociados. Esto último, puede estar reflejando problemas de acceso en lo no GES. Por último, se reseña de modo general, la propuesta que está siendo trabajada en el sector para modificar los sistemas de transferencia.


The current mechanisms of financial transfer in the Chilean Health Care System imply incentives that are not up to the challenges of the Health Reform initiated in 2002. According to the authors, important modifications are required. We present empirical evidence of the undesired effects of those mechanisms on the overall generation of health services in the last few years. Starting in 2005, the Health Reform introduced Explicit Guarantees (GES) for the Provision of certain services, and these are linked to the mechanisms of payment to the providers. There has been a general decrease in the activities of the National Health Services System, an increase of emergency care and in the purchase of external services via the Explicit Guarantees and also via the Free Choice option included in the public system. The reduction of the general activity of the public system is not matched by a fall in productivity: what we observe is a change in the case mix, which is induced mainly by the Explicit Guarantees scheme and its associated commitments. A reduction of access to non GES care may be under way. We describe the general outline of a proposed change in the financial transfer mechanisms, which is being discussed in the health sector.


Subject(s)
Capitation Fee , Health Care Reform , Public Sector , Reimbursement, Incentive , Chile
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...