ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Commercially available plasma p-tau217 biomarker tests are not well studied in ethnically diverse samples. METHODS: We evaluated associations between ALZPath plasma p-tau217 and amyloid-beta positron emission tomography (Aß-PET) in Hispanic/Latino (88% of Cuban or South American ancestry) and non-Hispanic/Latino older adults. One- and two-cutoff ranges were derived and evaluated to assess agreement with Aß-PET. RESULTS: A total of 239 participants underwent blood draw and Aß-PET (age 70.8 ± 7.8, 55.2% female, education 15.6 ± 3.4 years, 48.9% Hispanic/Latino, 94.9% white). Plasma p-tau217 showed excellent discrimination of Aß-PET positive and negative participants (visual read: AUC = 0.91 [0.87-0.95], p < 0.001; Centiloids quantification: AUC = 0.90 [0.86-0.94]). There was a greater percent agreement between low p-tau217 and negative Aß-PET (95.8%) than high p-tau217 and positive Aß-PET (86.3%). Analyses within ethnicity-specific subgroups suggested similar p-tau217 performance. DISCUSSION: Plasma p-tau217 (ALZPath) relates to brain Aß in Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic/Latino older adults. Independent validation and replication are necessary to establish reference ranges and inform appropriate contexts of use across ethno-racially diverse populations. HIGHLIGHTS: Plasma p-tau217 (ALZPath) and Aß-PET were measured in Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic/Latino older adults.Plasma p-tau217 accurately discriminated Aß-PET positive and negative participants.Applying a two-cutoff "intermediate" plasma p-tau217 approach could reduce need for more invasive and costly testing.Plasma p-tau217 associations with Aß-PET were strong within both Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic/Latino groups.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Plasma NfL (pNfL) levels are elevated in many neurological disorders. However, the utility of pNfL in a clinical setting has not been established. OBJECTIVE: In a cohort of diverse older participants, we examined: 1) the association of pNfL to age, sex, Hispanic ethnicity, diagnosis, and structural and amyloid imaging biomarkers; and 2) its association to baseline and longitudinal cognitive and functional performance. METHODS: 309 subjects were classified at baseline as cognitively normal (CN) or with cognitive impairment. Most subjects had structural MRI and amyloid PET scans. The most frequent etiological diagnosis was Alzheimer's disease (AD), but other neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders were also represented. We assessed the relationship of pNfL to cognitive and functional status, primary etiology, imaging biomarkers, and to cognitive and functional decline. RESULTS: pNfL increased with age, degree of hippocampal atrophy, and amyloid load, and was higher in females among CN subjects, but was not associated with Hispanic ethnicity. Compared to CN subjects, pNfL was elevated among those with AD or FTLD, but not those with neuropsychiatric or other disorders. Hippocampal atrophy, amyloid positivity and higher pNfL levels each added unique variance in predicting greater functional impairment on the CDR-SB at baseline. Higher baseline pNfL levels also predicted greater cognitive and functional decline after accounting for hippocampal atrophy and memory scores at baseline. CONCLUSION: pNfL may have a complementary and supportive role to brain imaging and cognitive testing in a memory disorder evaluation, although its diagnostic sensitivity and specificity as a stand-alone measure is modest. In the absence of expensive neuroimaging tests, pNfL could be used for differentiating neurodegenerative disease from neuropsychiatric disorders.
