Malignant hyperthermia in Poland: A survey study.

Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a life-threatening syndrome caused by sudden, uncontrolled skeletal muscle hypermetabolism in response to inhalation anesthetics and depolarizing relaxants. The estimated incidence of MH is between 1:10,000 and 1:250,000 anesthetic procedures. In Poland, due to lack of reporting, the incidence of MH is unknown. Dantrolene is imported as a life-saving drug (target import) and temporally authorized for sale. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of malignant hyperthermia in Poland and to assess the accessibility to dantrolene in Poland. A questionnaire was conducted among the chiefs of anesthesia and intensive care units in Poland. During the years 2014 to 2019, 10 episodes of MH have been reported in 238 surveyed polish anesthesia departments. The estimated prevalence is 1:350,000. Eight patients survived the MH crisis. Dantrolene is stocked in 48 (20%) anesthesiology departments. Among the surveyed hospitals, only in 38 (16%) it is possible to administer dantrolene within 5 minutes of suspecting a MH reaction. Less than half units (44%) have an algorithm for the management of MH episode in the operating theaters. The results of the study revealed, that the prevalence of MH in Poland is lower than the prevalence reported in other countries. Access to dantrolene in Poland is limited.

Malignant hyperthermia in Mazovia Province - are we adequately prepared?

INTRODUCTION: Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a life-threatening syndrome caused by sudden skeletal muscle hypermetabolism in response to inhalation anaesthetics and depolarising relaxants. The estimated incidence of MH is between 1 : 10,000 and 1 : 250,000 anaesthetic procedures. In Poland the incidence of MH is unknown. Dantrolene is imported as a life-saving drug and temporally authorised for sale. The aim of the study is to assess the incidence of MH and access to dantrolene in the Mazovia Province. METHODS: Anonymous questionnaires were sent to anaesthesia departments in the Mazovia Province after prior contact by phone and e-mail. The survey was approved by the local ethical review board. RESULTS: Completed surveys were received from 60 respondents which represents 72% of anaesthesiology departments in Mazovia. In the last 5 years there have been 4 episodes of MH in the Mazovia Province. Three patients survived the MH crisis. In a centre that did not have access to dantrolene, the patient died. Dantrolene is found only in 11 (18.3%) anaesthesiology departments in Mazovia. Only 6 (10%) hospitals are able to administer dantrolene within 5 minutes of suspecting MH crisis, while 5 centres may receive it after a few days. Only 38% of units have an algorithm for dealing with MH crisis in the operating theatres. CONCLUSIONS: MH is rare, but if untreated, it can be fatal. Therefore prompt diagnosis and treatment are crucial to avoid fatal outcome. Every centre using inhalational anaesthetics and/or succinylcholine should have dantrolene. To ensure the safety of our patients, we must be better prepared.

COVID-19: coagulation disorders and anticoagulant treatment in patients hospitalised in ICU.

Patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) due to the COVID-19 experience a high incidence (up to 43%) of venous thromboembolic events. While laboratory findings in COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (CAC) show increased D-dimer and fibrinogen levels, the abnormalities in standard coagulation tests and platelet count are minimal. Recent studies suggest contribution of fibrinolysis shutdown to this phenomenon. Endothelial injury and alteration of its antithrombotic activity can lead to micro- and macrovascular thrombosis in the lungs, occurrence of which is associated with poor clinical outcome in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Additionally, the hypercoagulability induced by activation of coagulation pathways during the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection contributes to impaired organ perfusion. This, alongside with hypoxemia, leads to multiorgan failure. Various diagnostic regimens, some of which include global assays of haemostasis, are currently being published and discussed. Numerous guidelines and recommendations of scientific societies and groups of specialists have been published. However, there is no single optimal algorithm for anticoagulation treatment and monitoring specific to the ICU patients with COVID-19. The authors have attempted to summarize the data related to CAC and thrombotic disease and develop an algorithm consistent with the latest clinical practice guideline recommendations.

Response to the article "Perioperative standards for the treatment of coagulation disorders and usage of blood products in patients undergoing liver transplantation used in the Clinic for Transplant Surgery in Wroclaw".

We read with interest the article by Lukaszewski et al. published in Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine:1211-1215, published online on July 18th, 2018, as ahead of print). As enthusiasts of promoting global assays of hemostasis, we would like to commend the authors for their commitment and effort in their implementation and clinical application. As the authors rightly pointed out in the article, perioperative care of liver transplantation (OLTx) patients is challenging for transplant team members due to the risk of severe changes in global hemostasis. Lukaszewski et al. presented a single center experience in using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) to monitor hemostasis during liver transplantation. In our center, this method has been used routinely since 2008. So far it has been used in over 400 patients undergoing OLTx. Considering the potential contribution to thrombotic complications (including portal vein thrombosis after liver transplantation), we believe that antifibrinolytic treatment should be reserved for patients with active bleeding and hyperfibrinolysis confirmed by ROTEM. The available literature indicates an increased risk of thrombotic complications in patients receiving antifibrinolytic therapy. This raises an important question for the authors about the reason for using Exacyl® in all 12 of the cases presented, even in patients who did not require any blood product transfusion. We hope that our letter will open up further discussion on this subject, which is undoubtedly crucial for OLTx patients' safety.