Differential diagnosis of back pain.

Back pain (BP) is among the most common reasons for seeking medical attention worldwide. The nature of BP depends on the causative stimulus and its anatomical location. Clinically, BP is manifested by pain, muscle tension, and stiffness. The development of BP is a very complex, multifactorial process in which not only somatic stimuli (anatomical structures), but also psychosocial effects are involved. Using a variety of criteria, BP can be divided into specific where the cause of pain is known, nonspecific wherein the cause remains unclear, or according to its duration (i.e., acute, subacute, and chronic back pain). Simple low back pain must be distinguished from inflammatory BP. Inflammatory BP is one of the symptoms of spondyloarthritides. It is typically a resting pain of insidious onset, peaking at night or in the morning associated with morning stiffness, improved with exercise, and responding to non-steroidal antirheumatic drugs. A red-flag system was developed for the early identification of at-risk patients with a potentially severe disease presenting with BP. Early diagnosis and identification of the cause of complaints often requires multidisciplinary cooperation. The treatment involves pharmacological agents (analgesic and muscle relaxation therapies) and nonpharmacological approaches (rehabilitation, surgical intervention, etc.).

The Examination of a TPMT Gene Before Administration of Azathioprine in Rheumatology Practice and Identification of a Novel Variant p.W29R.

METHODS: Two-hundred patients were assessed for the presence of genetic allelic variants using PCR amplification and direct sequencing. RESULTS: In 19 patients, we detected genetic allelic variants affecting TPMT activity; in 1 case, it was an unpublished heterozygous variant c.85T>C (p.W29R); of those, 15 patients were switched from AZA to a different medication, and 1 patient was prescribed a reduced dose of AZA. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show the importance of testing for variants of the TPMT gene before the administration of AZA in clinical rheumatology practice. Patients with documented episodes of leukopenia or elevated liver biochemical tests while on AZA should undergo TPMT genotype testing and/or TPMT enzyme activity testing.

Renal parenchymal hypertension: relevant new aspects.

Renal parenchymal disease is the most common cause of secondary hypertension, accounting for up to 5% cases of all cases of systemic hypertension. Renal parenchymal hypertension occurs as a complication of a wide variety of glomerular and tubulointerstitial diseases and may aggravate the decline of kidney function. The pathophysiology of renal parenchymal hypertension represents a combined interaction of the impaired sodium handling leading to volume expansion, alteration of the renin-angiotensin system, abnormalities in endogenous vasodepressor compounds and possibly enhanced activity of vasoactive substances. Renal parenchymal hypertension can occur in acute and chronic kidney disease, manifesting early in the renal function impairment. It often requires complex pharmacological treatment of blood pressure and is prognostically unfavorable in terms of cardiovascular and renal complications. This form of secondary hypertension can often be successfully treated by therapy of the underlying renal disease. In case of insufficient blood pressure compensation, renal impairment progresses. The aim of this paper is to give a brief overview of renoparenchymatous hypertension, current diagnostic possibilities and principles of therapy.

Does the renal expression of Toll-like receptors play a role in patients with IgA nephropathy?

The onset of IgA nephropathy (IgAN), characterized by glomerular deposition of IgA-containing immune complexes, is often associated with synpharyngitic hematuria. Innate immune responses mediated by Toll-like receptors (TLR) may play a role in IgAN onset and/or progression. Here, we assessed the expression of TLR 4, 7, 8, and 9 in renal-biopsy specimens from patients with IgAN, with different degree of proteinuria and eGFR, compared with normal-kidney and disease-control tissues (ANCA-associated vasculitis). Renal-biopsy specimens from 34 patients with IgAN and 7 patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis were used. In addition, we used 15 healthy portions of renal-tissue specimens from kidneys after nephrectomy for cancer as control specimens. Expression of TLR 4, 7, 8, and 9 was assessed using immunohistochemical staining of paraffin-embedded renal-biopsy tissue specimens with specific antibodies and evaluated semiquantitatively by light microscopy. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was used to test whether intrarenal staining of TLR 4, 7, 8, and 9 distinguished patients with IgAN from controls or correlated with eGFR and/or proteinuria. eGFR was calculated using the creatinine-based formula. Moreover, the biopsies from patients with IgAN were scored according to the Oxford Classification. LDA showed that staining for TLR 4, 7, 8, and 9 was more intense in specimens from IgAN patients compared to normal kidney tissues. The intensity of intrarenal staining of TLRs discriminated four groups of IgAN patients with different eGFR and proteinuria and MEST scoring.

Safety, immunogenicity and efficacy after switching from reference infliximab to biosimilar SB2 compared with continuing reference infliximab and SB2 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results of a randomised, double-blind, phase III transition study.

OBJECTIVES: Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity results from the phase III study of SB2, a biosimilar of reference infliximab (INF), were previously reported through 54 weeks. This transition period compared results in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who switched from INF to SB2 with those in patients who maintained treatment with INF or SB2. METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe RA despite methotrexate treatment were randomised (1:1) to receive SB2 or INF at weeks 0, 2 and 6 and every 8 weeks thereafter until week 46. At week 54, patients previously receiving INF were rerandomised (1:1) to switch to SB2 (INF/SB2 (n=94)) or to continue on INF (INF/INF (n=101)) up to week 70. Patients previously receiving SB2 continued on SB2 (SB2/SB2 (n=201)) up to week 70. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were assessed up to week 78. RESULTS: Efficacy was sustained and comparable across treatment groups. American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 responses between weeks 54 and 78 ranged from 63.5% to 72.3% with INF/SB2, 66.3%%-69.4% with INF/INF and 65.6%-68.3% with SB2/SB2. Treatment-emergent adverse events during this time occurred in 36.2%, 35.6% and 40.3%, respectively, and infusion-related reactions in 3.2%, 2.0% and 3.5%. Among patients who were negative for antidrug antibodies (ADA) up to week 54, newly developed ADAs were reported in 14.6%, 14.9% and 14.1% of the INF/SB2, INF/INF and SB2/SB2 groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy, safety and immunogenicity profiles remained comparable among the INF/SB2, INF/INF and SB2/SB2 groups up to week 78, with no treatment-emergent issues or clinically relevant immunogenicity after switching from INF to SB2. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01936181; EudraCT number: 2012-005733-37.

Comparing biosimilar SB2 with reference infliximab after 54 weeks of a double-blind trial: clinical, structural and safety results.

Objectives: SB2 is a biosimilar to the reference infliximab (INF). Similar efficacy, safety and immunogenicity between SB2 and INF up to 30 weeks were previously reported. This report investigates such clinical similarity up to 54 weeks, including structural joint damage. Methods: In this phase III, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre study, patients with moderate to severe RA despite MTX were randomized (1:1) to receive 3 mg/kg of either SB2 or INF at 0, 2, 6 and every 8 weeks thereafter. Dose escalation by 1.5 mg/kg up to a maximum dose of 7.5 mg/kg was allowed after week 30. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were measured at each visit up to week 54. Radiographic damage evaluated by modified total Sharp score was measured at baseline and week 54. Results: A total of 584 patients were randomized to receive SB2 (n = 291) or INF (n = 293). The rate of radiographic progression was comparable between SB2 and INF (mean modified total Sharp score difference: SB2, 0.38; INF, 0.37) at 1 year. ACR responses, 28-joint DAS, Clinical Disease Activity Index and Simplified Disease Activity Index were comparable between SB2 and INF up to week 54. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and anti-drug antibodies were comparable between treatment groups. Such comparable trends of efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were consistent from baseline up to 54 weeks. The pattern of dose increment was also comparable between SB2 and INF. Conclusion: SB2 maintained similar efficacy, safety and immunogenicity with INF up to 54 weeks in patients with moderate to severe RA. Radiographic progression was comparable at 1 year. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01936181) and EudraCT (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu; 2012-005733-37).

A randomised, double-blind, phase III study comparing SB2, an infliximab biosimilar, to the infliximab reference product Remicade in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of SB2 to the infliximab reference product (INF) in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate therapy. METHODS: This is a phase III, randomised, double-blind, multinational, multicentre parallel group study. Patients with moderate to severe RA despite methotrexate therapy were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either SB2 or INF of 3 mg/kg. The primary end point was the American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response at week 30. Inclusion of the 95% CI of the ACR20 response difference within a ±15% margin was required for equivalence. RESULTS: 584 subjects were randomised into SB2 (N=291; 290 analysed) or INF (N=293). The ACR20 response at week 30 in the per-protocol set was 64.1% in SB2 versus 66.0% in INF. The adjusted rate difference was -1.88% (95% CI -10.26% to 6.51%), which was within the predefined equivalence margin. Other efficacy outcomes such as ACR50/70, disease activity score measured by 28 joints and European League against Rheumatism response were similar between SB2 and INF. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable (57.6% in SB2 vs 58.0% in INF) as well as the incidence of antidrug antibodies (ADA) to infliximab up to week 30 (55.1% in SB2 vs 49.7% in INF). The PK profile was similar between SB2 and INF. Efficacy, safety and PK by ADA subgroup were comparable between SB2 and INF. CONCLUSIONS: SB2 was equivalent to INF in terms of ACR20 response at week 30. SB2 was well tolerated with a comparable safety profile, immunogenicity and PK to INF. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01936181.

Serum tenascin-C discriminates patients with active SLE from inactive patients and healthy controls and predicts the need to escalate immunosuppressive therapy: a cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine whether circulating levels of the proinflammatory glycoprotein tenascin-C (TNC) are useful as an activity-specific or predictive biomarker in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Serum TNC levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at inception visit in a prospective cohort of 59 SLE patients, and in 65 healthy controls (HC). SLE patients were followed for a mean of 11 months, disease activity was assessed using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2 K) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group disease activity index (BILAG-2004), clinical and laboratory data were recorded every 3-6 months, and changes in glucocorticoids (GC) and immunosuppressants (IS) were recorded serially. We examined cross-sectionally the relationships between serum concentrations of TNC and SLE status, SLEDAI-2 K scores, strata of disease activity, and levels of conventional biomarkers [anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), anti-nucleosome antibodies, C3 and C4]. We also explored the utility of TNC levels for predicting disease flares, defined as (i) new/increased GC, (ii) new/increased GC or IS, and (iii) increase in SLEDAI by ≥3 or (iv) BILAG A or B flare. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mean levels of TNC between the SLE patients and HC. However, in SLE patients with active disease (SLEDAI ≥6), the TNC levels were significantly higher than in the HC (p = 0.004) or in patients with no/low disease activity (p = 0.004). In SLE patients, TNC levels were significantly associated with positivity of anti-dsDNA (p = 0.03) and anti-nucleosome antibodies (p = 0.008). Flares defined by a need to escalate immunosuppressive therapy were captured more frequently and earlier than flares defined by standard activity indices. Higher baseline levels of serum TNC presented a significantly greater risk of flare (i) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.73] or (ii) (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.52) but not of flares (iii) or (iv). The baseline serum TNC level was the single most important independent predictor of flare (i) compared with conventional biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: TNC is not disease-specific, but it seems to indicate the activity of SLE and may predict the need to escalate immunosuppressive therapy. TNC levels may thus serve as a useful activity-specific and predictive biomarker in SLE.

Complement system in SLE as a target for antibodies.

SLE is characterized by overproduction of various types of autoantibodies. Under certain circumstances, antibodies targeting some of the neoepitopes of the complement system can be seen. The most studied among antibodies directed against a component of the complement system is anti-C1q. Anti-C1q antibodies are present in approximately one third of the patients with lupus, who often have high clinical disease activity and in particular renal involvement. In the presence of high titers of anti-C1q antibodies also the levels of C1q and C3 and C4 components of the complement system are also usually low. The presence of the anti-C1q antibodies is not limited or specific just for SLE or lupus nephritis. For the first time, they were described in HUVS (Hypocomplementemic Urticarial Vasculitis Sydrome), later in Felty´s syndrome, rheumatoid vasculitis, hepatitis C, poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis or aging population.

European School of Internal Medicine (ESIM) in Brighton: experiences and reflections.

The European School of Internal Medicine (ESIM) is a meeting aimed at young physicians training in internal medicine throughout Europe. Since 1998 the school has been held annually, and in this report we reflect on our experiences during the recent school in Brighton in July 2010. The school combined a broad mix of lectures, workshops and case presentations covering a variety of rare diseases, and both faculty and residents participated with noticeable enthusiasm, making this a special experience for all of us. The school also provided an opportunity to compare and discuss topical professional issues in internal medicine in Europe and was a memorable social gathering for physicians who share a strong interest in internal medicine.

Merkel cell carcinoma of the gluteal region with ipsilateral metastasis into the pancreatic graft of a patient after combined kidney-pancreas transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare tumour of the skin that predominantly affects elderly or immunocompromised patients. The malignant transformation of Merkel cells is currently considered to be related to an infection with Merkel cell polyomavirus. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a 62-year-old man who developed a Merkel cell polyomavirus-positive MCC in a non-UV-exposed part of the right gluteal region 8 years after combined kidney-pancreas transplantation. Following excision and radical re-excision of the tumour, no adjuvant radiotherapy was indicated because of the risk of adjacent pancreatic graft failure. Despite adjustment of the immunosuppressive therapy with conversion to sirolimus, the tumour generalised and metastasised into the pancreatic graft, leading to its failure. Subsequent chemotherapy did not affect the course of the disease, and the patient died 9 months after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, we present the first case of MCC associated with metastatic involvement of the transplanted pancreas followed by its subsequent failure. Given the highly aggressive course of the disease in patients after organ transplantation, MCC therapy should be sufficiently aggressive from the time of diagnosis and should not be influenced by attempts to preserve graft function.

Subclinical toxicity of calcineurin inhibitors in repeated protocol biopsies: an independent risk factor for chronic kidney allograft damage.

The purpose of the prospective study was to determine the prevalence of subclinical toxicity of calcineurin inhibitors (CI) in repeated protocol renal allograft biopsies and to assess its impact on the development of chronic graft changes. A total of 424 biopsies were conducted in a cohort of 158 patients; of these biopsies, 158 were in the third week, 142 were in the third month and 124 were in the first year after transplantation. Histological signs of toxicity occurred in the third week in 33 (20.1%) patients, with persistence after CI dose reduction in the third month in 27 (19.0%) and in the first year in 23 (18.5%) patients. Of the toxic changes, 52% were clinically silent. At the end of the one-year follow-up, both subclinical and clinically manifest toxicity resulted in a similar progression of chronic changes quantified by Banff chronicity score and they significantly differed from the control group (P < 0.05). Subclinical toxicity affects a significant percentage of grafts; it occurs independently of dosage, blood level and type of applied CI. It is associated with the progression of chronic changes as early as in the first year after transplantation and represents an independent risk factor for chronic allograft damage. We report here our clinical approach to toxicity.

The levels of sCD30 and of sCD40L in a group of patients with systemic lupus erythematodes and their diagnostic value.

CD30/CD30L and CD40/CD40L are molecules from the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily. They have a major effect on communications between the B and T cells, which leads to control of maturation, proliferation, and apoptosis of those cells. The aim of this study was to compare the levels of a soluble form of CD30 (sCD30) and a soluble ligand CD40 (sCD40L) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n=65) and healthy controls (sCD30 n=20, sCD40L n=10) with other parameters of SLE activity. Patients were divided into subgroups according to presence or absence of lupus nephritis (LN; 33 with LN, 32 without LN). The serum levels of selected parameters were assessed also in the subgroups with low active disease characterized by European Lupus Activity Measure (ECLAM) at most 3(n=29) and active disease with ECLAM more than 3 (n=36). The serum levels of sCD30 were 66.0+/-40.2 UI/ml in the whole group. The mean serum levels were 60.0+/-45.2 UI/ml in the subgroups with LN, 67.1+/-38.9 UI/ml in the subgroup without LN, 80.2+/-51.9 UI/ml in the subgroup with active disease, 55.4+/-24.1 UI/ml in the subgroup with low active disease, and finally, 40.1+/-19.2 U/ml in the controls. Significant differences were found between the SLE patients and controls (p=0.0001) and between the active and nonactive groups (p=0.002). A correlation was found between levels of CD30 and ECLAM (r=0.25, p