ABSTRACT
This case report describes the management of a woman diagnosed with a retroperitoneal cystic tumor during pregnancy. The 29-year-old patient presented at 29 weeks of pregnancy with abdominal pain. A retroperitoneal tumor measuring 224 × 156 × 235 mm was identified on ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. The patient underwent cesarean section delivery of a healthy neonate at 37 weeks. Uncomplicated laparoscopic surgery was performed during the postpartum period, resulting in a histologic diagnosis of a retroperitoneal lymphangioma. A review of articles published between 2003 and 2023 on the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of gestational lymphangiomas was conducted using the PubMed, SCOPUS and SpringerLink databases. Ten articles, including case reports of lymphangiomas diagnosed during pregnancy, were identified. The most frequent location was the gastrointestinal tract, with no cases reported in the retroperitoneal area. A good perinatal outcome was reported in the majority of cases. Lymphangiomas are rare benign tumors that are even more uncommon during pregnancy. Watchful waiting can offer a good obstetric and perinatal prognosis.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Studies have highlighted the effects the use of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist can have on lowering mortality and surgical complications. Implementation of the checklist is not easy and several barriers have been identified. Few studies have addressed personnel's acceptance and attitudes toward the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. Determining personnel's acceptance might reflect their intention to use the checklist while their awareness and knowledge of the checklist might assess the effectiveness of the training process. METHODS: Through an anonymous self- responded questionnaire, general characteristics of the respondents (age, gender, profession and years spent studying or working at the hospital), knowledge of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (awareness of existence, knowledge of objectives, knowledge of correct use), acceptance of the checklist and its implementation (including personal belief of benefits of using the checklist), current use, teamwork and safety climate appreciation were determined. RESULTS: Of the 147 surgical personnel who answered the questionnaire, 93.8% were aware of the existence of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist and 88.8% of them reported knowing its objectives. More nurses than other personnel knew the checklist had to be used before the induction of anesthesia, skin incision, and before the patient leaves the operating room. Most personnel thought using the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist is beneficial and that its implementation was a good decision. Between 73.7% and 100% of nurses in public and private hospitals, respectively, reported the checklist had been used either always or almost always in the general elective surgeries they had participated in during the current year. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high acceptance of the checklist among personnel, gaps in knowledge about when the checklist should be used still exist. This can jeopardize effective implementation and correct use of the checklist in hospitals in Guatemala City. Efforts should aim to universal awareness and complete knowledge on why and how the checklist should be used.
Subject(s)
Checklist , General Surgery , Medical Staff, Hospital/psychology , Patient Safety/standards , World Health Organization , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cities , Female , Guatemala , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
En el año 2004 la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), como resultado de múltiples eventos adversos que ocurrían en sala de operaciones, lanzó la hoja de verificación de la Cirugía Segura, para tratar de disminuir los eventos indeseables durante la cirugía. Este estudio evaluó el efecto de la capacitación del personal que se encuentra en el quirófano durante las cirugías, analizando el cumplimiento de los parámetros de la Hoja de Verificación de la Cirugía Segura...
