Device regulation and surveillance in vascular care: Challenges and opportunities.

Cardiovascular devices are essential for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases including cerebrovascular, coronary, valvular, congenital, peripheral vascular and arrhythmic diseases. The regulation and surveillance of vascular devices in real-world practice, however, presents challenges during each individual product's life cycle. Four examples illustrate recent challenges and questions regarding safety, appropriate use and efficacy arising from FDA approved devices used in real-world practice. We outline potential pathways wherein providers, regulators and payors could potentially provide high-quality cardiovascular care, identify safety signals, ensure equitable device access, and study potential issues with devices in real-world practice.

Impact of concomitant surgical interventions on outcomes of septal myectomy in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Septal myectomy (SM) is offered to symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) despite medical therapy. Frequently, patients undergo concomitant planned or ad-hoc mitral valve replacement (MVR), aortic valve replacement (SAVR), or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess characteristics and outcomes of patients with oHCM undergoing concomitant surgical interventions at the time of SM. METHODS: The National Readmission Databases were used to identify all SM admissions in the United States (2010-2019). Patients undergoing SM were stratified into: isolated SM (±MV repair), SM + CABG only, SM + MVR, SM + SAVR, and SM + MVR + SAVR. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, in-hospital adverse events, and 30-day readmission. RESULTS: 12,063 encounters of patients who underwent SM were included (56.1% isolated SM, 9.0% SM + CABG only, 17.5% SM + MVR, 13.1% SM + SAVR, and 4.3% SM + MVR + SAVR). Patients who underwent isolated SM were younger (54.3 vs. 67.1 years-old, p < 0.01) and had lower overall comorbidity burden. In-hospital mortality was lowest in isolated SM, followed by CABG only, SM + SAVR, SM + MVR, and SM + SAVR+MVR groups (2.3% vs. 3.7% vs. 5.3% vs. 6.7% vs. 13.7%, p < 0.01), respectively. SM with combined surgical interventions was associated with higher adverse in-hospital events (24.3% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.01) and 30-day readmissions (16.9% vs. 10.4%, p < 0.01). MV repair performed concomitantly with SM was not associated with increased in-hospital mortality (3.9% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.72; aOR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.54-1.80, p = 0.97]) or adverse clinical events. CONCLUSIONS: In SM for oHCM, patients undergoing concomitant surgical interventions were characteristically distinct. Aside from MV repair, concomitant interventions were associated with worse in-hospital death, adverse in-hospital events, and 30-day readmission.

Hospital-Level Variability in Reporting of Ischemic Stroke Subtypes and Supporting Diagnostic Evaluation in GWTG-Stroke Registry.

BACKGROUND: Secondary prevention of ischemic stroke (IS) requires adequate diagnostic evaluation to identify the likely etiologic subtype. We describe hospital-level variability in diagnostic testing and IS subtyping in a large nationwide registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used the GWTG-Stroke (Get With The Guidelines-Stroke) registry to identify patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of acute IS at 1906 hospitals between January 1, 2016, and September 30, 2017. We compared the documentation rates and presence of risk factors, diagnostic testing, achievement/quality measures, and outcomes between patients with and without reported IS subtype. Recording of diagnostic evaluation was optional in all IS subtypes except cryptogenic, where it was required. Of 607 563 patients with IS, etiologic IS subtype was documented in 57.4% and missing in 42.6%. Both the rate of missing stroke pathogenesis and the proportion of cryptogenic strokes were highly variable across hospitals. Patients missing stroke pathogenesis less frequently had documentation of risk factors, evidence-based interventions, or discharge to home. The reported rates of major diagnostic testing, including echocardiography, carotid and intracranial vascular imaging, and short-term cardiac monitoring were <50% in patients with documented IS pathogenesis, although these variables were missing in >40% of patients. Long-term cardiac rhythm monitoring was rarely reported, even in cryptogenic stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Reporting of IS etiologic subtype and supporting diagnostic testing was low overall, with high rates of missing optional data. Improvement in the capture of these data elements is needed to identify opportunities for quality improvement in the diagnostic evaluation and secondary prevention of stroke.

REAFFIRMING THE CORE VALUES OF ACADEMIC CARDIOLOGY.

Academic medical centers are rapidly evolving into academic health systems with expanding clinical activity. These changes coupled with financial pressures due to decreased clinical reimbursements and failure of the NHLBI budget to keep pace with inflation are challenging the ability to succeed in all our missions. New governance structures and financial models may be necessary to success in our research and educational missions.

Hospital Procedural Volume and Clinical Outcomes Following Septal Reduction Therapy in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Background Prior national data showed a substantial in-hospital mortality in septal myectomy (SM) with an inverse volume-outcomes relationship. This study sought to assess the contemporary outcomes of septal reduction therapy and volume-outcome relationship in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Methods and Results All septal reduction therapy admissions between 2010 to 2019 in the United States were analyzed using the National Readmission Databases. Hospitals were stratified into tertiles of low-, medium-, and high-volume based on annualized procedural volume of alcohol septal ablation and SM. Of 19 007 patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who underwent septal reduction therapy, 12 065 (63%) had SM. Two-thirds of hospitals performed ≤5 SM or alcohol septal ablation annually. In all SM encounters, 482 patients (4.0%) died in-hospital post-SM. In-hospital mortality was <1% in 1505 (88.4%) hospitals, 1% to 10% in 30 (1.8%) hospitals, and ≥10% in 167 (9.8%) hospitals. There were 63 (3.7%) hospitals (averaging 2.2 SM cases/year) with 100% in-hospital mortality. Post-SM (in low-, medium-, and high-volume centers, respectively), in-hospital mortality (5.7% versus 3.9% versus 2.4%, P=0.003; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.86 [95% CI, 1.70-4.80], P=0.001), adverse in-hospital events (21.30% versus 18.0% versus 12.6%, P=0.001; aOR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.45-2.43], P=0.001), and 30-day readmission (17.1% versus 12.9% versus 9.7%, P=0.001; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.27-1.96], P=0.001) were significantly higher in low- versus high-volume hospitals. For alcohol septal ablation, the incidence of in-hospital death and all other outcomes did not differ by hospital volume. Conclusions In-hospital SM mortality was 4% with an inverse volume-mortality relationship. Mortality post-alcohol septal ablation was similar across all volume tertiles. Morbidity associated with SM was substantial across all volume tertiles.

The changing landscape of interventional cardiology: A survival guide in the era of health system consolidation: The Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions affirms the value of this manuscript.

Practice environments for interventional cardiologists have evolved dramatically and now include small independent practices, large cardiology groups, multispecialty groups, and large integrated health systems. Increasingly, cardiologists are employed by hospitals or health systems. Data from MedAxiom and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) demonstrate an exponential increase in the percentage of cardiologists in employed positions from 10% in 2009 to 87% in 2020. This white paper explores these profound changes, considers their impact on interventional cardiologists, and offers guidance on how interventional cardiologists can best navigate this challenging environment. Finally, the paper offers a potential model to improve the employed physician experience through greater physician involvement in decision making, which may increase jobs satisfaction.

Shared Decision-Making in Cardiovascular Practice.

Clinical decisions are optimally made collaboratively, with patients and clinicians working together to review all available information and treatment options. A comprehensive dialogue that identifies and brings into focus individual patient goals within the context of the evidence base is the ideal approach. Shared decision-making (SDM) is essential to making choices about treatment preferences and characterizes the optimal practice of evidence-based medicine and good patient care. By supporting patient autonomy and engagement, the patient and family become partners in their health care. Decisions surrounding whether or not to proceed with diagnostic and therapeutic procedures after fully discussing appropriate alternatives are best made considering both the evidence base and patient goals. The central feature of SDM is that a clinician and a patient engage in a dialogue to jointly make decisions, with reciprocated sharing of information that both find beneficial to reach the best decision. SDM entails much more than patient education or informed consent: there must be bidirectional transfer of knowledge, discussion of patient preference, and a process of deliberation reaching consensus. Patient decision aids have been shown to improve patient understanding of options and risks, enhance the patient's involvement, and focus their comprehension of treatment preferences. Patient decision aids also may be of value in strengthening the physician-patient relationship. The need to emphasize SDM should be integrated into the quality process at every level to make it meaningful, not an apparently arbitrary obstacle that requires discovery of a shrewd work-around. A more patient-oriented consideration of the benefits of symptom relief and improved quality of life, in addition to survival and freedom from adverse events, could only be beneficial.

Severe MR With Prior Alfieri Stitch Treated With Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair and a Vascular Plug.

We present a case of a high-risk surgical patient with prior surgical Alfieri stitch and recurrent severe mitral regurgitation. In cases with suitable anatomy, mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and vascular plug closure of a small regurgitant orifice can be used with excellent results. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Position Statement on Vascular Access Safety for Percutaneous Devices in AMI Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.

In the United States, the frequency of using percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock is increasing. These devices require large-bore vascular access to provide left, right, or biventricular cardiac support, frequently under urgent/emergent circumstances. Significant technical and logistical variability exists in device insertion, care, and removal in the cardiac catheterization laboratory and in the cardiac intensive care unit. This variability in practice may contribute to adverse outcomes observed in centers that receive patients with cardiogenic shock, who are at higher risk for circulatory insufficiency, venous stasis, bleeding, and arterial hypoperfusion. In this position statement, we aim to: 1) describe the public health impact of bleeding and vascular complications in cardiogenic shock; 2) highlight knowledge gaps for vascular safety and provide a roadmap for a regulatory perspective necessary for advancing the field; 3) propose a minimum core set of process elements, or "vascular safety bundle"; and 4) develop a possible study design for a pragmatic trial platform to evaluate which structured approach to vascular access drives most benefit and prevents vascular and bleeding complications in practice.

Incidence and outcomes of cardiogenic shock among women with spontaneous coronary artery dissection.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on cardiogenic shock (CS) incidence and outcomes among patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD). METHODS: Women admitted to the hospital for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with and without SCAD were identified from the United States National Readmission Database from October 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018. We calculated the incidence of CS among women with AMI with and without SCAD and odds for developing CS after adjusting for baseline characteristics. In addition, we report the utilization of percutaneous coronary intervention, mechanical circulatory support, severe disability surrogates, and 30-day readmission rates. RESULTS: A total of 664,292 patients admitted for AMI were eligible for analysis, including 6643 patients with SCAD and 657,649 without SCAD. Patients with SCAD were younger (57 years [interquartile range, IQR 48-68] vs. 71 years [IQR 60-81], p < 0.01) and had fewer comorbidities yet had a higher incidence of CS as compared to patients without SCAD (9% vs. 5%, p < 0.01) and remained at elevated risk after adjusting for baseline comorbidities (adjusted odds ratio 1.5 [95% confidence interval, CI 1.2-1.7]). Among patients who developed CS, those with SCAD had lower in-hospital mortality than non-SCAD (31% vs. 39%, p < 0.01), and were more likely to receive mechanical circulatory support. CONCLUSIONS: In a nationally representative sample of women admitted for AMI, we found that patients with SCAD had a higher risk of developing CS and required more frequent use of mechanical circulatory support but were more likely to survive to discharge than women suffering AMI from causes other than SCAD.

Contemporary diagnosis and management of severe tricuspid regurgitation.

Many novel percutaneous interventions are being developed for application in the tricuspid valve position. At the present time in the United States, there are no commercially available transcathter devices for this application. This article reviews the growing evidence for diagnosing, imaging, and treating severe tricuspid regurgitation as well as the surgical and transcatheter options that are under current development and in various stages of clinical trials.

Tricuspid Valve Percutaneous Therapies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we have focused on the currently available transcatheter tricuspid valve therapies, device selection, as well as role and management of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in the setting of other transcatheter valvular procedures. RECENT FINDINGS: In this review, we have enlisted the recently finished as well as ongoing trials in the percutaneous tricuspid valve therapies. TR is highly prevalent yet remains underrecognized and is often untreated. TR has traditionally been managed conservatively with medical therapies including diuretics for volume management, whereas surgical therapies are reserved for those undergoing left-sided valvular surgery. Although the transcatheter devices for tricuspid repair and replacement are in clinical trials, the experience to date for their effectiveness and safety has been reassuring.

Novel method for left ventricular unloading utilizing percutaneous pulmonary artery drainage in cardiorespiratory failure due to COVID-19 infection.

Left ventricular (LV) unloading is an important concept in patients undergoing peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). We present a case of a 32-year-old male in acute cardiorespiratory collapse due to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) who underwent VA-ECMO cannulation in the setting of cardiogenic shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Due to inability to utilize percutaneous LV assist device (pLVAD) for LV unloading due to small end diastolic dimension, alternative strategies were explored. A traditionally utilized right ventricular support device, the ProTek Duo (TandemLife, Pittsburgh, PA), was utilized to drain the pulmonary artery, leading to improvement in parameters for cardiogenic shock. To our knowledge, this is the first case in which a ProTek Duo has been utilized in conjunction with VA-ECMO to provide LV unloading in support of a patient in cardiogenic shock. This method can be employed in future challenging situations where pLVAD is not feasible.

Age stratified sex-related differences in incidence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data on age-stratified sex differences in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock (CS). We sought to study these differences from a contemporary database. METHODS: Patients admitted with CS (2004-2018) were identified from the United States National Inpatient Sample. We compared CS (acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock [AMI-CS] and non-acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock [Non-AMI-CS]) incidence, management, and outcomes in males and females, stratified into four age groups (20-44, 45-64, 65-84, and ≥85 years of age). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used for adjustment. RESULTS: A total of 1,506,281 weighted hospitalizations for CS were included (AMI-CS, 39%; Non-AMI-CS, 61%). Across all age groups, females had a lower incidence of CS compared with males. After PSM and among the AMI-CS cohort, higher mortality among females compared with males was observed in the age groups 45-64 (28.5% vs. 26.3%) and 65-84 years (39.3% vs. 37.9%) (p < 0.01, for all). Among the Non-AMI-CS cohort, higher mortality among females compared with males was observed in the age groups 20-44 (33.5% vs. 30.5%), 45-64 (35.1% vs. 31.9%), and 65-84 years (41.7% vs. 40.3%) (p < 0.01, for all). Similar age-dependent differences in the management of CS were also observed between females and males. CONCLUSIONS: Females have a lower incidence of CS regardless of age. Significant disparities in the management and outcomes of CS were observed based on sex. However, these disparities varied by age and etiology of CS (AMI-CS vs. Non-AMI-CS) with pronounced disparity among females in the age range of 45-84 years.

TAVR operator volumes, trends, and geographic variations amongst Medicare beneficiaries in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) operator procedural volumes, and describe temporal and geographic trends. BACKGROUND: TAVR is the standard of care for most patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Despite an association between operator procedural volume and outcomes, nationwide TAVR operator volumes have been incompletely described. METHODS: We queried the National Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Database for transfemoral TAVRs from 2014 to 2018. Annual operator volume, state and regional volumes, and longitudinal trends were extracted and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: In 2018, the mean annual operator volume was 23.6 TAVRs. The highest 1% of operators by volume performed 7.6% of total TAVR procedures in the United States, while 35.7% of operators performed 10 or fewer TAVRs per year. From 2014 to 2018, there was a 53.9% annualized increase in TAVRs, and the mean annual volume per operator grew from 12.5 to 23.6. There was more than five-fold variability in the density of operators (range 0.35-1.79 operators per 100,000 population) and mean operator volume by state (range 14.2-52.4 TAVRs per operator). CONCLUSIONS: In this nationally representative study of operators performing transfemoral TAVRs among Medicare patients, we found the mean annual volume of TAVR in 2018 to be 23.6 and has increased since 2014. There was considerable variability in operator density and procedural volumes, with a significant proportion of operators performing 10 or fewer TAVRs per year. Ambiguity remains in regard to the optimal balance of procedural requirements to sustain high efficacy outcomes and ensure critical access to TAVR therapies.