Contemporary approach to cardiogenic shock care: a state-of-the-art review.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a time-sensitive and hemodynamically complex syndrome with a broad spectrum of etiologies and clinical presentations. Despite contemporary therapies, CS continues to maintain high morbidity and mortality ranging from 35 to 50%. More recently, burgeoning observational research in this field aimed at enhancing the early recognition and characterization of the shock state through standardized team-based protocols, comprehensive hemodynamic profiling, and tailored and selective utilization of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices has been associated with improved outcomes. In this narrative review, we discuss the pathophysiology of CS, novel phenotypes, evolving definitions and staging systems, currently available pharmacologic and device-based therapies, standardized, team-based management protocols, and regionalized systems-of-care aimed at improving shock outcomes. We also explore opportunities for fertile investigation through randomized and non-randomized studies to address the prevailing knowledge gaps that will be critical to improving long-term outcomes.

Best practices for vascular arterial access and closure: a contemporary guide for the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

More than 1 million transcatheter-based cardiovascular procedures across the spectrum of interventional cardiology are performed annually in the United States. With the expanded indications for and increased complexities associated with these procedures, interventional cardiologists are expected to possess the requisite expertise to complete these interventions safely and effectively. While the art of vascular access and closure remains a prerequisite and critical skillset in contemporary practice, there remain significant variations in the techniques employed, resulting in the bleeding and vascular complications encountered in clinical practice. With an increasing recognition of the potential merits to standardized approaches to vascular access and closure, cardiovascular societies have put forth recommendations around best practices for performing these procedures in the cardiac catheterization laboratories. In this review, we aim to: (1) Examine the evolving definitions of bleeding and vascular complications; (2) Review best practices for transradial and transfemoral access and closure, including for large bore procedures; and (3) Highlight knowledge gaps and proposed areas of clinical research pertaining to vascular access which may inform clinical practice and potentially optimize the outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter-based cardiac and vascular interventions.

A Randomized Comparison of Radial Artery Intimal Hyperplasia Following Distal Versus Proximal Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography: PRESERVE RADIAL.

BACKGROUND: Distal transradial access (dTRA) is an alternative to conventional forearm transradial access (fTRA) for coronary angiography (CAG). Differences in healing of the radial artery (RA) in the forearm have not been evaluated between these 2 access strategies. We sought to compare the mean difference in forearm RA intimal-medial thickening (IMT) in patients randomized to dTRA versus fTRA. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this single-center randomized clinical trial, 64 patients undergoing nonemergent CAG were randomized (1:1) to dTRA versus fTRA. Ultra-high-resolution (55-MHz) vascular ultrasound of the forearm and distal RA was performed pre-CAG and at 90 days. The primary end point was the mean change in forearm RA IMT. Secondary end points included procedural characteristics, vascular injury, RA occlusion, and ipsilateral hand pain and function. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, mean forearm RA IMT, and procedural specifics were similar between the dTRA and fTRA cohorts. There was no difference in mean change in forearm RA IMT between the 2 cohorts (0.07 versus 0.07 mm; P=0.37). No RA occlusions or signs of major vascular injury were observed at 90 days. Ipsilateral hand pain and function (Borg pain scale score: 12 versus 11; P=0.24; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulders, and Hand scale score: 6 versus 8; P=0.46) were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Following CAG, dTRA was associated with no differences in mean change of forearm RA IMT, hand pain, and function versus fTRA for CAG. Further investigation is warranted to elucidate mechanisms and predictors of RA healing and identify effective strategies to preserving RA integrity for repeated procedures. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04801901.

A non-interventional cardiologist's guide to coronary chronic total occlusions.

Coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO) are present in up to one-third of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). It is thus essential for all clinical cardiologists to possess a basic awareness and understanding of CTOs, including optimal evaluation and management. While percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for CTO lesions has many similarities to non-CTO PCI, there are important considerations pertaining to pre-procedural evaluation, interventional techniques, procedural complications, and post-procedure management and follow-up unique to patients undergoing this highly specialized intervention. Distinct from other existing topical reviews, the current manuscript focuses on key knowledge relevant to non-interventional cardiologists.

A Randomized Comparison of Radial Artery Intimal Hyperplasia Following Distal vs. Proximal Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography: PRESERVE RADIAL Trial.

Background: Distal transradial access (dTRA) is an alternative to conventional forearm transradial access (fTRA) for coronary angiography (CAG). Differences in healing of the radial artery in the forearm (FRA) have not been evaluated between these 2 access strategies. We sought to compare FRA intimal-medial thickening (IMT) in patients randomized to dTRA vs. fTRA for CAG. Methods and Results: Sixty-four consecutive patients undergoing non-emergent CAG were randomized (1:1) to dTRA vs. fTRA. Ultrahigh resolution (55 MHz) vascular ultrasound) of the FRA and distal RA was performed pre-CAG and at 90 days. Primary endpoint was 90-day FRA IMT. Secondary endpoints included procedural characteristics, vascular injury, RA occlusion and ipsilateral hand pain and function. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, mean FRA IMT, time to RA access, procedure time, and radiation exposure were similar between the dTRA and fTRA cohorts. There were no between group differences in 90-day FRA IMT (0.37 mm vs 0.38 mm, respectively; p =0.73). No RA occlusions or signs of major vascular injury were observed at 90 days. Ipsilateral hand pain and function (Borg pain scale:12 vs 11, p =0.24; DASH scores: 6 vs 8, p =0.46) were comparable. Conclusions: In this single center randomized clinical trial, similar patterns of FRA vascular healing at 90 days, procedural results as well as hand pain and function were observed following dTRA vs. fTRA for CAG. Further investigation is warranted to better understand the mechanistics and predictors of RA healing and to identify strategies aimed at preserving RA integrity for future procedures. What is New?: DTRA has been proposed as an alternative to traditional fTRA in the wrist for CAG and PCI because of ergonomic and post-procedural recovery benefits to the patient, as well as potential reductions in occlusion of the FRA.There are gaps in knowledge, however, regarding potential differences in remodeling of the FRA in patients undergoing dTRA versus fTRA.In this randomized clinical trial, there were no differences in IMT and patterns of vascular injury and healing, using ultrahigh resolution (55 MHz) ultrasound, at 90 days in patients randomized to dTRA or FTRA for elective and non-emergent CAG and PCI. What Are the Clinical Implications: Our findings highlight the need for further inquiry through large multicenter randomized clinical trials to better the understand the mechanistics and predictors of IMT and to identify strategies to mitigate the adverse effects of vessel remodeling in patients undergoing TRA across the entire severity spectrum of cardiovascular disease.

Initial Findings From the North American COVID-19 Myocardial Infarction Registry.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted many aspects of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care, including timely access to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). OBJECTIVES: The goal of the NACMI (North American COVID-19 and STEMI) registry is to describe demographic characteristics, management strategies, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients with STEMI. METHODS: A prospective, ongoing observational registry was created under the guidance of 3 cardiology societies. STEMI patients with confirmed COVID+ (group 1) or suspected (person under investigation [PUI]) (group 2) COVID-19 infection were included. A group of age- and sex-matched STEMI patients (matched to COVID+ patients in a 2:1 ratio) treated in the pre-COVID era (2015 to 2019) serves as the control group for comparison of treatment strategies and outcomes (group 3). The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital death, stroke, recurrent myocardial infarction, or repeat unplanned revascularization. RESULTS: As of December 6, 2020, 1,185 patients were included in the NACMI registry (230 COVID+ patients, 495 PUIs, and 460 control patients). COVID+ patients were more likely to have minority ethnicity (Hispanic 23%, Black 24%) and had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (46%) (all p < 0.001 relative to PUIs). COVID+ patients were more likely to present with cardiogenic shock (18%) but were less likely to receive invasive angiography (78%) (all p < 0.001 relative to control patients). Among COVID+ patients who received angiography, 71% received PPCI and 20% received medical therapy (both p < 0.001 relative to control patients). The primary outcome occurred in 36% of COVID+ patients, 13% of PUIs, and 5% of control patients (p < 0.001 relative to control patients). CONCLUSIONS: COVID+ patients with STEMI represent a high-risk group of patients with unique demographic and clinical characteristics. PPCI is feasible and remains the predominant reperfusion strategy, supporting current recommendations.

Invasive hemodynamic assessment of patients with submassive pulmonary embolism.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the invasive hemodynamics in patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) and the change that occurs with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). BACKGROUND: Intermediate-risk PE is associated with right ventricular strain and worse outcomes yet the invasive hemodynamics have not been well described. METHODS: Ninety-two consecutive patients with intermediate-risk PE referred for CDT at two tertiary medical centers with Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams were included in this prospective cohort study. Hemodynamics at baseline and after CDT therapy was measured. Patients with cardiac index (CI) ≤1.8 L min-1 m-2 were compared to those without shock (CI > 1.8). Linear regression analysis was performed to study the relationship between clinical variables and low CI. RESULTS: Thirty-seven out of 92 (40%) had a CI less than 1.8 L min-1 m-2 . When comparing the low CI to the normal CI groups, most demographics, vital signs, biomarkers, and PE severity index (PESI) scores were similar. The low CI group had more females and slightly lower systolic blood pressures although still in the normal range (122 vs. 132 mmHg, p = .026). Treatment with CDT was associated with significant improvement in CI, heart rate, and pulmonary artery pressures in both groups. Linear regression analysis did not reveal a strong correlation between CI and noninvasive metrics such as heart rate, blood pressure, or PESI score. CONCLUSIONS: Forty percent of patients with submassive PE had a depressed CI and treatment with CDT lead to hemodynamic improvements. Invasive hemodynamics may help better identify higher risk patients and guide therapy.

Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease and Anemia on Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.

Few studies have evaluated outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with both anemia (hemoglobin < 12 g/dl in women; <13 in men) and chronic kidney disease (CKD, estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2). Patients with coronary artery disease who underwent PCI in our health system from 2010 to 2018 were included (n = 10,756), excluding those with ST-elevation myocardial infarction or shock. We evaluated the individual and combined effects of anemia and CKD on outcomes. Five-year mortality was highest in the cohort with both anemia and CKD and lowest in those with neither. After multivariate analysis, with the group with neither anemia nor CKD as a reference, the adjusted hazard ratio for mortality was 1.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45 to 1.95, p <0.001) for those with anemia alone, 1.33 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.53, p <0.001) for those with CKD alone, and 2.83 (95% CI 2.49 to 3.22, p <0.001) for those with both anemia and CKD. With respect to readmission and reintervention, similar tends were observed, with patients with both CKD and anemia having the highest risk for these outcomes. In conclusion, the combined effects of anemia and CKD on outcomes post-PCI appear to be worse than either of their effects individually.

Echocardiographic Predictors of Tricuspid Ring Annuloplasty Repair Failure for Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation.

OBJECTIVE: Significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) recurs after tricuspid valve repair of functional TR in 15% to 20% within the first year, and 30% to 70% within 5 years. Prior investigations report leaflet tethering, and not tricuspid valve annular diameter (TVAD), as predictive of recurrent TR. The authors hypothesize that pre-repair TVAD is predictive of repair failure for functional TR. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four patients with functional TR scheduled for left heart surgery and tricuspid valve repair with ring annuloplasty. DESIGN: Retrospective study design. Pre- and post-repair transthoracic and intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic data included left and right ventricular functions, tricuspid leaflet tethering height, TVAD, and TR severity. Successful repair was defined as ≤2+ TR. SETTING: Tertiary care medical center. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Forty-five patients had a successful repair and 9 did not. Preoperative and intraoperative TVAD in diastole (TVADdiast) ≥4.2 cm, and preoperative systole (TVADsyst) ≥3.7 cm, but not leaflet tethering, were predictive of repair failure. Right ventricular (RV) width >4.88 cm was associated with repair failure. Neither pre- nor post-repair pulmonary artery systolic pressures (PASP) were predictors of repair failure. However, PASP did not change nor did RV function improve in the nonsuccessful repair group. CONCLUSION: For patients with functional TR undergoing primary left heart surgery, preoperative TVAD (systole and diastole), RV width, and postoperative RV function were predictors of repair outcome. Earlier TV repair and optimizing right heart function may improve repair outcome.

Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Prevention and Management.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex clinical syndrome that constitutes nearly half of all heart failure cases. Because of lack of effective pharmacological targets to improve outcomes, the emphasis of the management and prevention of HFpEF should be through control of risk factors. This review will use the framework proposed by the American Heart Association on 7 simple measures ("Life's Simple 7") that involves diet and lifestyle changes to achieve ideal cardiovascular health. These 7 measures include (1) smoking, (2) obesity, (3) exercise, (4) diet, (5) blood pressure, (6) cholesterol, and (7) glucose control, which can help control the most common comorbidities and risk factors associated with HFpEF, such as hypertension, diabetes, and obesity. Therefore, application of these 7 simple measures would be a patient-centered and cost-effective way of prevention and management of HFpEF.