Ratio of remnant-like particle-cholesterol to serum total triglycerides is an effective alternative to ultracentrifugal and electrophoretic methods in the diagnosis of familial type III hyperlipoproteinemia.

BACKGROUND: Familial type III hyperlipoproteinemia (HLP) is characterized by the presence of beta-migrating VLDL (beta-VLDL) and increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Assessment of plasma beta-VLDL is achieved by measuring the ratio of VLDL-cholesterol (VLDL-C) to total plasma triglycerides (TGs) or by detecting beta-VLDL in total VLDL. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical utility of the ratio of remnant-like particle-cholesterol (RLP-C) to total TGs with that of the current methods for diagnosing type III HLP. METHODS: Detection of beta-VLDL by electrophoresis of VLDL was used to define type III HLP. Twenty-eight patients with type III HLP and 43 subjects lacking beta-VLDL were investigated. Fasting TG concentrations were >2.26 mmol/L in all subjects. Subjects were separated into three groups: group 1, serum total cholesterol 5.18 mmol/L and TGs between 2.26 and 9.04 mmol/L (n = 51); and group 3, TGs >9.04 mmol/L (n = 9). RESULTS: In group 2, a RLP-C-to-total TG molar ratio >/=0.23 (>/=0.10 when using mg/dL) and a VLDL-C-to-total TG molar ratio >/=0.69 (>/=0.30 when using mg/dL) correctly classified 94% and 90% of the subjects, respectively. The utility of the RLP-C-to-total TG ratio in diagnosing type III HLP decreased in patients in the other two groups. CONCLUSION: When used in an appropriate target population, the RLP-C-to-total TG ratio is a convenient and effective alternative to ultracentrifugal and electrophoretic methods for diagnosing type III HLP.

Evaluation of the Clot Signature Analyzer as a hemostasis test in healthy volunteers exposed to low doses of aspirin.

Several variables affect bleeding time that make it difficult to obtain consistent measurements. The Clot Signature Analyzer (CSA) has been developed to assess in vitro hemostasis using well-controlled flow chambers. In this study, the equivalencies in the CSA parameters with the conventional bleeding time or platelet aggregation methods were evaluated in subjects exposed to aspirin. The CSA parameters, platelet hemostasis time (PHT) and collagen-induced thrombus formation (CITF), were compared to bleeding time (Surgicutt2) and collagen-induced platelet aggregation, respectively. Fifty-three healthy volunteers were given two doses of aspirin (81 and 243 mg) in one day. Following the baseline period, the volunteers took 81 mg of aspirin and then took 243 mg 2 hours later. The changes in each value from the baseline to that at either aspirin dose (2 hours after dosing) were evaluated. Platelet hemostasis time and CITF correlated well with bleeding time and aggregation, respectively, but PHT was not significantly increased after 81 mg of aspirin, whereas bleeding time was significantly increased. The variation in PHT was slightly higher than that of bleeding time. At 81 mg, CITF was significantly increased but aggregation was not, even though the variation was comparable. This suggests that PHT and CITF can simulate the changes in bleeding time and aggregation, respectively, but the sensitivity of PHT for detecting the changes in bleeding time was no better than the conventional method. Also, CITF was more sensitive than aggregation in detecting platelet response to collagen. In conclusion, the proposed CSA is not always suitable for detecting hemostatic abnormalities.

Evaluation of an immunoseparation method for quantitative measurement of remnant-like particle-cholesterol in serum and plasma.

Substantial evidence indicates that triglyceride-rich lipoprotein remnants are atherogenic. Additional research has, however, been limited by available methods for separation and quantification of remnants. We have evaluated an immunoseparation assay developed to measure cholesterol in remnant-like particles (RLP-C). This method uses monoclonal antibodies to human apolipoproteins B-100 and A-I to remove most of the apolipoprotein B-100-containing lipoproteins (namely LDL and nascent VLDL) and apolipoprotein A-I-containing lipoproteins (namely chylomicrons and HDL), leaving behind a fraction of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, including chylomicron and VLDL remnants, both of which are enriched in apolipoprotein E. Cholesterol in the unbound fraction is measured with a sensitive enzymatic assay. The RLP-C concentration was highly correlated with total triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (sum of VLDL-cholesterol and IDL-cholesterol) separated by ultracentrifugation and by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (r = 0.86 and 0.76, respectively). The within-run and run-to-run imprecision (CV) of the assay was approximately 6% and 10%, respectively. The assay was not affected by hemoglobin up to 5000 mg/L (500 mg/dL), bilirubin up to 342 mmol/L (20 mg/dL), glucose up to 67 mmol/L (1200 mg/dL), or ascorbic acid up to 170 mmol/L (3.0 mg/dL). In 726 subjects (men, n = 364; women, n = 362) in the US, the 75th percentiles of RLP-C concentration were 0.17 mmol/L (6.6 mg/dL) and 0.23 mmol/L (8.8 mg/dL) in sera obtained after overnight fasting or randomly, respectively. A group of 151 patients from nine US centers and one Canadian center with coronary artery atherosclerosis established by angiography had higher median RLP-C concentrations than 302 gender- and age-matched controls (P <0.05). We conclude that the RLP-C assay compares favorably to ultracentrifugation and electrophoresis and provides a convenient and economical approach to measure triglyceride-rich lipoprotein remnants in routine clinical laboratories.

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of atorvastatin, an inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, in healthy subjects.

This study examined the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of atorvastatin, an investigational inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, in 50 healthy subjects by means of a randomized, double-blind parallel-group design. Volunteers received rising single and multiple doses of 0.5 to 80 mg/day atorvastatin (40 subjects) or placebo (10 subjects). The drug was administered once or twice daily for 14 days. Atorvastatin was well tolerated by healthy subjects. The most common adverse events reported after atorvastatin-headache and nausea-occurred as frequently after placebo. Atorvastatin peak concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) values increased more than proportionally with atorvastatin dose after both single and multiple drug doses. The extent of atorvastatin absorption (AUC) was similar after once- or twice-daily drug administration. Steady-state drug concentrations were achieved by the third day of drug dosing. Mean elimination half-life values ranged from 11 to 24 hours. Atorvastatin accumulation was approximately 1.5- and 3.0-fold after once- and twice-daily administration, respectively. Atorvastatin produced dose-related reductions in total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol that were similar after once- and twice-daily drug administration. Reductions in mean total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values ranged from 13% and 22% (2.5 mg/day) to 45% and 58% (80 mg/day), respectively (p < or = 0.0013 in comparison with placebo and with baseline over this dose range). In summary, atorvastatin doses of up to 80 mg/day were well tolerated and had significant cholesterol-lowering effects.

Effects of regular and extended-release gemfibrozil on plasma lipoproteins and apolipoproteins in hypercholesterolemic patients with decreased HDL cholesterol levels.

We have studied, in a prospective blinded fashion, the effects of regular and extended-release gemfibrozil on plasma lipoprotein and apolipoprotein (apo) levels in hypercholesterolemic subjects with decreased high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (C) levels. Study participants were men and women 19 to 80 years of age with baseline plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) C levels > or = 4.5 mmol/l (175 mg/dl), HDL-C levels < or = 1.2 mmol/l (45 mg/dl), and triglyceride levels < or = 3.4 mmol/L (300 mg/dl). All subjects were stabilized on a diet for eight weeks prior to entry into two different protocols. In the first protocol 229 subjects were randomized to placebo or extended-release gemfibrozil (1200 mg/day) for 3 months (placebo trial). In the second protocol 655 subjects were randomized to regular or extended-release gemfibrozil (1200 mg/day) for 6 months (equivalency trial). Changes in lipids and apos were stratified by baseline HDL-C levels (< 0.9 mmol/l, and 0.9-12.2 mmol/l). In both studies, treatment with gemfibrozil, either regular or extended-release, was associated with significant (P < 0.05) decreases in plasma very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) C and triglyceride levels of 42-45% and 33-37%, respectively, in subjects with HDL-C level < 0.9 mmol/l, and of 38-47% and 32-39%, respectively, in patients with HDL-C levels of 0.9-1.2 mmol/l. Modest reductions from baseline in directly measured LDL-C levels were observed in both groups (3-6% and 8-9%, respectively). These reductions were less than those observed for calculated LDL-C (7-10% and 11%, respectively). For apo B, reductions were 11-14% and 16-17% in the two groups. HDL-C, apo A-I, and apo A-II levels increased by 15-16%, 5-6%, and 21-25%, respectively, in patients with HDL-C < 0.9 mmol/l, and by 6-7%, 2-3%, and 19-22%, respectively, in patients with HDL-C of 0.9-1.2 mmol/l. These differences in HDL-C levels reached statistical significance in the equivalency trial (P < 0.0001) and were independent of baseline triglyceride levels. Our data indicate that gemfibrozil, either regular or extended-release, is highly effective in lowering plasma triglyceride levels and increases HDL-C levels by approximately 15% in hypercholesterolemic patients with low HDL-C levels (< 0.9 mmol/l). Moreover, this agent lowers VLDL-C somewhat more than triglyceride, resulting in an underestimation of calculated VLDL-C reductions and in an overestimation of calculated LDL-C reductions. This agent also raises apo A-II levels much more than apo A-I levels.

Tolerance and pharmacokinetics of single-dose atorvastatin, a potent inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, in healthy subjects.

Tolerance and pharmacokinetics after single-dose administration of atorvastatin, an investigational inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, were examined in 22 healthy volunteers in a three-period, partially-blinded study. Participants received capsule and solution doses of atorvastatin (0.5 to 120 mg) and placebo at weekly intervals. Atorvastatin was well tolerated at doses as high as 80 mg. The adverse event profile was similar after administration of atorvastatin capsules and placebo. Atorvastatin solution was slightly less well tolerated. The most common side effect after administration of capsules and solution was headache, followed by sporadic reports of diarrhea, flatulence, and nausea. At the 120-mg solution dose, one participant experienced mild, transient restlessness, euphoria, and mental confusion that were considered to be dose-limiting side effects. Mean concentrations of atorvastatin, maximum concentration (Cmax), and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of the last detectable concentration (AUCo-tldc) increased with increasing dose. Plasma elimination half-life (t1/2) ranged from 14.7 to 57.6 hours. The bioavailability of atorvastatin capsules was similar to that of solution. These results suggest that atorvastatin is well tolerated after single doses as high as 80 mg, and may require administration only once daily.

Pharmacodynamic effects and pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin after administration to normocholesterolemic subjects in the morning and evening.

The pharmacodynamic effects and pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin, a potent investigational inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, were studied in 16 normolipidemic subjects after administration of 40 mg daily for 15 days in the morning or evening. Lipid and apolipoprotein parameters were determined, and plasma atorvastatin equivalent concentrations were measured according to a validated enzyme inhibition bioassay procedure. Atorvastatin was well tolerated by the participants. Overall, mean reductions of 34% in total cholesterol, 48% in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, 37% in very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, 25% in triglycerides, 6% in apolipoprotein A-I, and 34% in apolipoprotein B were observed. Changes in lipid and apolipoprotein values were similar after morning and evening administration of atorvastatin. In contrast, studies with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors have consistently shown that evening administration results in larger reductions in total and LDL cholesterol than does morning administration. Rate and extent of equivalent absorption of atorvastatin were lower during evening than morning administration. Mean elimination half-life values were similar, however, suggesting that there is no diurnal variation in disposition of this drug. Pharmacokinetic differences did not correlate with effects on serum lipids.

Effect of food on the bioavailability of atorvastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor.

To determine whether atorvastatin, a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, could be administered with food in Phase II and III clinical trials, a nonblind, randomized, two-way crossover study was conducted to assess the effect of food on rate and extent of atorvastatin absorption. Sixteen healthy volunteers received single 80-mg atorvastatin capsule doses on two occasions one week apart: once after an 8-hour overnight fast and once with a medium-fat breakfast. The single 80-mg atorvastatin capsule doses were well-tolerated. Mean maximum plasma atorvastatin equivalent concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values with food were 47.9% and 12.7% lower, respectively, than without food. Mean time of maximum observed concentration (tmax) and elimination half-life (t1/2) values were 5.9 and 32.0 hours, respectively, with food and 2.6 and 35.7 hours, respectively, without food. A medium-fat breakfast decreased the rate of atorvastatin absorption significantly, but had little impact on extent of drug absorption. Changes in rate of atorvastatin absorption are not expected to have a clinically significant effect, as subsequent multiple-dose clinical studies have shown that dose but not plasma atorvastatin concentration profiles correlates with lipid-lowering effects.