Identification of Salivary Metabolic Signatures Associated with Primary Sjögren's Disease.

Sjögren's disease (SjD) is the second most prevalent autoimmune disorder that involves chronic inflammation of exocrine glands. Correct diagnosis of primary SjD (pSjD) can span over many years since disease symptoms manifest only in advanced stages of salivary and lachrymal glandular destruction, and consensus diagnostic methods have critical sensitivity and selectivity limitations. Using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, we determined the composition of metabolites in unstimulated saliva samples from 30 pSjD subjects and 30 participants who do not have Sjögren's disease (non-Sjögren's control group, NS-C). Thirty-four metabolites were quantified in each sample, and analysis was conducted on both non-normalized (concentration) and normalized metabolomics data from all study participants (ages 23-78) and on an age-restricted subset of the data (ages 30-70) while applying false discovery rate correction in determining data significance. The normalized data of saliva samples from all study participants, and of the age-restricted subset, indicated significant increases in the levels of glucose, glycerol, taurine, and lactate, as well as significant decreases in the levels of 5-aminopentanoate, acetate, butyrate and propionate, in subjects with pSjD compared to subjects in the NS-C group. Additionally, a significant increase in choline was found only in the age-restricted subset, and a significant decrease in fucose was found only in the whole study population in normalized data of saliva samples from the pSjD group compared to the NS-C group. Metabolite concentration data of saliva samples from all study participants, but not from the age-restricted subset, indicated significant increases in the levels of glucose, glycerol, taurine, and lactate in subjects with pSjD compared to controls. The study showed that NMR metabolomics can be implemented in defining salivary metabolic signatures that are associated with disease status, and can contribute to differential analysis between subjects with pSjD and those who are not affected with this disease, in the clinic.

Comparing the effectiveness and adverse effects of pilocarpine and cevimeline in patients with hyposalivation.

OBJECTIVES: Pilocarpine (PILO) and cevimeline (CEV) are muscarinic acetylcholine receptor agonists that stimulate salivary gland function. The aim of this investigation was to retrospectively run a head-to-head comparison for their effectiveness and frequency of adverse effects in patients with hyposalivation. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients seen at the Oral Medicine Clinic at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (TUSDM) and was prescribed PILO or CEV. Patients' demographics, medical history/medication, stimulated salivary (SS), and unstimulated salivary (US) flow recorded at the initial visit and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups were collected. Changes in dosage/frequency, side effects, and drug discontinuation were also reported. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients' charts were reviewed. The majority of subjects (91%) were females with an average age of 61. At 3-month follow-up, the use of CEV showed significant improvement in SS compared to PILO (p = .033) but not in US (p = .10). At 6-month follow-up, there was no significant difference in SS or US between the two groups (SS: p = .09; US: p = .71). The use of PILO was associated with a higher proportion of adverse effects compared to CEV (p = .04). The overall adherence rate was significantly higher in the CEV group (p = .0056). CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of CEV and PILO is comparable. However, PILO seems to be associated with more reporting of side effects.