Intraoperative Rupture of an Intracranial, Extradural Hydatid Cyst: Case Report and Treatment Options.

A 23-year-old woman was presented to the Emergency Unit with intracranial hypertension syndrome and blindness in her left eye which had started recently. A cranial native computed tomography scan and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast examinations revealed a giant intracranial cystic lesion, extending into the left frontal lobe, which was compressing the optic chiasm and eroding the internal plate of the left frontal bone. Surgical craniotomy was performed for evacuation and decompression, but during the craniotomy the cyst ruptured. After assessing the degree of erosion of the internal bone plate, we concluded that the primary origin of the cyst was intraosseous. With the dura mater being intact, abundant lavage with H2O2 was applied and the bone flap was replaced after rigorous bone scraping. Imaging control at six and twelve months identified no recurrence of the cyst. In the literature, hydatid cysts located in the skull bone are very rare and most of them rupture intraoperatively. Given their extremely low incidence in developed countries, any neurosurgeons' experience with such pathology is limited and in some cases surgery cannot be delayed. In the case of intracerebral hydatid cysts, a neurosurgeon usually has only one shot at surgery, so simple and quick-to-access therapeutic guidelines must be developed in order to inform the choice of surgical technique. We conclude that the most successful surgical approach could be double concentric craniotomy. This surgical technique is used in intracerebral tumors, which also have an important bone invasion.

Treatment with flow diverter stent during pregnancy.

Intracranial aneurysms are rarely diagnosed during pregnancy. If treatment is necessary, surgery was traditionally preferred over embolization in case of ongoing pregnancy, due to concerns regarding foetal radiation exposure. We present a case of 21 mm unruptured carotid-ophthalmic aneurysm diagnosed during pregnancy and treated with flow diversion. Foetal radiation dose was estimated between 1 and 5 mGy, well below recommended limits. Double antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel and aspirin was administered between week 17 and week 37, followed by uneventful vaginal delivery at 39 weeks. The new-born infant did not present any clinical abnormalities. Post-natal angiography showed complete aneurysm occlusion. To our knowledge, this is the first report of flow diverter stent placement during ongoing pregnancy. Although a good outcome was observed in this case, this result should be interpreted with caution. Further studies are needed in order to better define the safety profiles of intracranial stents and double antiplatelet therapies during pregnancy.

Analysing the Society for Vascular Surgery and American Association for Vascular Surgery scoring systems for outcomes post-endovascular aortic repair.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Assess the association between the Society for Vascular Surgery/American Association for Vascular Surgery (SVS/AVSS) (Rutherford et al., J Vasc Surg 26: 517-38, 1997; Chaikof et al., J Vasc Surg 35:1061-6, 2002) medical comorbidity scoring scheme (MCS), and the global scoring system (GS) and major morbidity and mortality after elective endovascular aneurysm repair. Primary end points were peri-operative morbidity and mortality. Secondary end points were intensive care unit admission, high dependency unit admission, total stay > 5 days and 2-year mortality. METHODS: The project was approved by the Galway Clinical Research Ethics Committee. This project followed the Declaration of Helsinki. Binary logistic regression was performed to assess the association of the scores and their individual components with the primary and secondary outcomes. Results were reported as odds ratio (OR) per point increase in score with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL). RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2015, 401 patients underwent elective EVARs. MCS was calculated for 396 patients while GS was calculated for 183 patients. The MCS (OR 1.906, CI 1.017-3.574, p = 0.044) was associated with perioperative morbidity. The MCS was associated with perioperative mortality (OR 8.875, CI 1.918-41.070, p = 0.005). The GS was associated with perioperative morbidity (OR 11.929, CI 1.151-123.584, p = .038) but not associated with perioperative mortality (OR 3.62, CI 0.006-2118.148, p = .692). CONCLUSIONS: The MCS shows association with perioperative morbidity and mortality. GS shows association with perioperative morbidity but not perioperative mortality; however, this may be due to our study being underpowered. We believe that the analysis of higher numbers of patients could unmask trends in both of these scores and individual components of both scores changed.