The Actis and Corail Femoral Stems Provide for Similar Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of new devices for total hip arthroplasty (THA) offers surgeons the ability to address deficits in the portfolio. However, once introduced, data regarding the performance of devices is not publicly available until their use is widespread. PURPOSE/QUESTIONS: The objective of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic performance, including patient reported outcomes and radiographic evidence of osseointegration, subsidence, and stress shielding, of the newer Actis femoral component to the Corail stem (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, USA), which has an extensive clinical history. METHODS: This short-term, retrospective cohort study was a single surgeon series of 330 anterior approach THAs, consisting of 165 cases using the Actis stem and 165 cases using the Corail stem. Both devices were cementless, titanium, tapered, hydroxyapatite-coated stems. They differed in geometry, neck choices, broach philosophy, and collar availability. Data was obtained for 1 year following THA. Functional outcomes were measured with the Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR.) survey. Complications were recorded from patient charts, and radiographic analysis was performed for signs of osseointegration, subsidence, and stress shielding. RESULTS: The groups shared similar demographic characteristics except the Actis population was younger with fewer women. The complication rate did not significantly vary, and no patient required revision within the first year. Radiographically, one patient in each group demonstrated subsidence. No cases exhibited radiolucent lines, and the prevalence of stress shielding at 1 year was comparable. HOOS, JR. scores did not significantly vary at 8 weeks or 1 year. CONCLUSION: The Actis stem does not carry an increased risk of device-related complications compared with the Corail implant. Although aspects of bone remodeling differed between groups, Actis achieved radiographic signs of bone ingrowth at the 1-year mark and performed well clinically, with equivalent patient reported outcome scores to the Corail stem.

Does It Matter: Total Hip Arthroplasty or Lumbar Spinal Fusion First? Preoperative Sagittal Spinopelvic Measurements Guide Patient-Specific Surgical Strategies in Patients Requiring Both.

BACKGROUND: In patients requiring both total hip arthroplasty (THA) and lumbar spinal fusion (LSF), consideration of preoperative sagittal spinopelvic measurements can aid in the prediction of postfusion compensatory changes in pelvic tilt (PT) and inform adjustments to traditional THA cup anteversion. This study aims to identify relationships between spinopelvic measurements and post-THA hip instability and to determine if procedure order reveals a difference in hip dislocation rate. METHODS: Patients at a single practice site who received both THA and LSF between 2005 and 2015 (292: 158 = LSF prior to THA, 134 = THA prior to LSF) were retrospectively reviewed for incidents of THA instability. Those with complete radiograph series (89) had their sagittal (standing) spinopelvic profiles measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 1.5 years, and 2 years postoperatively. Measured parameters included lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), PT, and sacral slope (SS). RESULTS: No significant differences in dislocation rates between operative order groups were elicited (7/73 LSF first, 4/62 THA first; Z = 0.664, P = .509). Compared to nondislocators, dislocators had lower LL (-10.9) and SS (-7.8), and higher PT (+4.3) and PI-LL (+7.3). Additional risk factors for dislocation included sacral fusion (relative risk [RR] = 3.0) and revision fusion (RR = 2.7) . Predictive power of the model generated through multiple regression to characterize individual profiles of post-LSF PT compensation based on perioperative measurements was most significant at 1 year (R2 = 0.565, F = 0.000456, P = .028) and 2 years (R2 = 0.741, F = 0.031, P = .001) postoperatively. CONCLUSION: In performing THA after LSF, it is theoretically ideal to proceed with THA at a postfusion interval of at least 1 year, beyond which further compensatory PT change is minimal. However, the order of surgical procedure revealed no statistical difference in hip instability rates. In cases characterized by large PI-LL mismatch (larger or less predictable compensation profiles) or large SS or LL loss (considerably atypical muscle recruitment), consideration of full functional anteversion range between sitting and standing positions to account for abnormalities not appreciated with standing radiographic assessment alone may be warranted.

Survivorship of the Modular Femoral Revision Stem.

The geriatric population represents a rapidly growing segment of society with prolonged life expectancies and more active lifestyles. Many of these patients have already undergone primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and are presenting with aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear, osteolysis, or periprosthetic fractures. Therefore, the demand for hip revision procedures is expected to grow. Currently, there are many modular implant options available for use in complicated revision THA. Early results of modular femoral revision systems are promising for the treatment of the deficient femur in complex revision THA. The objective of this study was to evaluate component survivorship of a modular femoral revision system in revision THA. A retrospective review was conducted using electronic health records of patients who underwent revision THA performed by 1 of 3 surgeon investigators from 2010 through 2014. The authors included all patients who underwent a revision THA using a specific modular femoral revision system. The authors evaluated component survivorship and time to re-revision THA. Fifty-one revision THAs were included. Seven patients required a second revision THA (13.7%; 95% confidence interval, 4%-23%). Mean time to re-revision THA was 4.88±3.9 months. Kaplan-Meier survivorship using re-revision for any reason was 86.3% at 60 months. This study showed excellent component survivorship of the specific modular femoral revision system in revision THA. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(5):294-298.].

Aspirin Alone Is Not Enough to Prevent Deep Venous Thrombosis After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Thromboembolic events after total joint arthroplasty are potentially devastating complications. This study evaluated the efficacy of 4 different anticoagulants in preventing deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after total joint arthroplasty. The demographics and anticoagulant use (warfarin, enoxaparin, and aspirin with and without outpatient mechanical pumps) for patients who underwent primary unilateral total joint arthroplasties performed by a single surgeon from January 2013 to October 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent lower extremity ultrasound at the 3-week postoperative visit. A total of 613 primary unilateral total joint arthroplasties met the study inclusion criteria. There were 288 primary total knee arthroplasties and 325 primary total hip arthroplasties. The patients were 62.2% female, having a mean age of 67.6±10.6 years and a mean body mass index of 30.2±5.9 kg/m2. There were 119 patients in group 1 (aspirin alone), 40 patients in group 2 (aspirin plus pumps), 246 patients in group 3 (warfarin), and 208 patients in group 4 (enoxaparin). The overall 3-week symptomatic and asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis and symptomatic pulmonary embolism rates in the entire cohort were 5.7% and 0.3%, respectively. The venous thromboembolism rate was significantly affected by the anticoagulant of choice (P<.01). Compared with aspirin alone, warfarin decreased the risk of venous thromboembolism (P<.01). Increasing age led to increased risk of venous thromboembolism (P=.05). This study indicated that aspirin chemoprophylaxis alone was not as efficacious as warfarin and enoxaparin in preventing asymptomatic and symptomatic venous thromboembolism found during routine postoperative surveillance with lower extremity ultrasound. Aspirin alone may be inadequate and should be augmented with an outpatient mechanical pump as part of multimodal prophylaxis. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(1):48-55.].

Is it safe? Outpatient total joint arthroplasty with discharge to home at a freestanding ambulatory surgical center.

BACKGROUND: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is trending toward shorter hospitalizations; as a result, there are many ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) starting to perform outpatient TJA. However, there are limited studies examining the safety of outpatient TJA in the freestanding ASC setting. This study aims to evaluate 30-day and 90-day complication rates in patients who underwent outpatient TJA at a freestanding, independent ASC with direct discharge to home. METHODS: A retrospective cohort review using health records was performed on the first 115 TJAs performed between August 2015 and March 2017 by one of the 4 orthopedic surgeons. Before the first TJA, the ASC had developed a multidisciplinary TJA pathway. RESULTS: Of the 115 TJAs, 37 (32%) were total hip arthroplasties (THAs), 53 (46%) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), and 25 (22%) unicompartmental knee arthroplasties, with a mean age of 57 ± 7 years and body mass index of 30 ± 5 kg/m2. There were no intraoperative or direct ASC-related complications. There was 1 instance (0.9%) of a postoperative minimally displaced intertrochanteric femur fracture after THA due to a fall treated nonoperatively complication within 30 days of surgery. Of the 90-day complication events, there were 2 patients (2%) with postoperative arthrofibrosis of the knee after TKA requiring manipulation under anesthesia, 1 postoperative patellar tendon rupture during therapy after TKA requiring surgical repair and 1 delayed hematogenous infection after international travel after THA requiring 2-staged exchange. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient TJA with discharge to home at a freestanding, independent ASC is a safe option after development of a multidisciplinary TJA pathway.

Alarmingly High Rate of Implant Fractures in One Modular Femoral Stem Design: A Comparison of Two Implants.

BACKGROUND: Reports of implant fracture at the modular junction have been seen in modular neck designs, stem-sleeve modular femoral stems, and diaphyseal engaging bi-body modular stems. To date, however, there has never been a direct comparison between 2 different implant designs from the same modular family. The purpose of this study is to compare the rate of implant failure of 2 such stem-sleeve modular femoral stem designs, the S-ROM and Emperion, to further identify factors which increase the risk of this mode of failure. METHODS: A retrospective, single surgeon, review of our institutional database was performed to compare the 2 groups of patients. RESULTS: A total of 1168 total hip arthroplasty procedures were included in our analysis, 547 (47%) with Emperion and 621 (53%) with S-ROM. Eight (1.5%) fractures in 7 patients occurred in the Emperion group compared to 1 (0.2%) fracture in the S-ROM group (P = .015). CONCLUSION: The precise cause of the stem fractures in our study remains unknown and is likely multifactorial. Given the unexpectedly high rate of catastrophic implant failures in the form of stem fracture at the stem-sleeve junction, we recommend more judicious use of modularity in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Comparing Electronic and Manual Tracking Systems for Monitoring Resident Duty Hours.

BACKGROUND: Changes in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) duty hour requirements have created significant monitoring responsibilities for institutions. This study explored the types of tracking systems used and determined for each type of tracking system the number of violations identified and the number of ACGME citations issued. METHODS: An 8-question, anonymous, electronic survey was sent to 3,275 residency program coordinators across 24 ACGME-accredited specialties nationwide. The survey was developed by the study investigators to gather data on the type of system used by programs, perceived advantages and disadvantages of the system, the number and types of violations identified, and subsequent ACGME citations for duty hour noncompliance. RESULTS: Of the 889 responses (27.1% response rate), 780 (87.7%) reported using an electronic system, while 94 (10.6%) used a manual system. Programs found electronic systems significantly superior on most characteristics, including accuracy, effectiveness, ease of use, reliability, reporting variety, and time investment (all P<0.001). Electronic systems identified significantly more violations than their manual counterparts; however, violation identification did not correlate with an increase in ACGME duty hour citations for programs using electronic systems (all P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Although a relationship was seen between the tracking system and the number of violations identified, no significant relationship was detected between the system used and the number of citations issued by the ACGME. While programs have invested considerable time, effort, and expense in systems to track duty hours, the real meaning of the data collected and its value to programs, residents, the ACGME, and the healthcare system remains unclear.

Assessing the perceived level of institutional support for the second victim after a patient safety event.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to establish a baseline of perceived availability of institutional support services or interventions and experiences following an adverse patient safety event (PSE) in a 650-bed children and adult community teaching hospital. METHODS: Investigators queried associates about their experiences after a PSE, what institutional support services or interventions they perceived to be available, and how helpful used services were. The investigators used an online modified version of a PSE survey developed by several health related organizations in Boston. RESULTS: One hundred twenty evaluable surveys were analyzed. Sixty-eight percent of respondents were nurses, 99% of whom were female. Only 10% to 30% of respondents reported that various support services or interventions were actively offered, and 30% to 60% indicated that they were not available. Respondents reported having experienced several distressing symptoms after a PSE, most notably, troubling memories (56%) and worry about lawsuits (37%). Less than 32% "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that they could report concerns without fear of retribution or punitive action. More respondents experienced support from clinical colleagues (64%) than from their manager or department chair (38%). CONCLUSIONS: These results validate a need by associates for emotional support after a PSE and that associates' perception of available formal institutional support services or interventions is low.