Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
World J Urol ; 34(3): 311-7, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26062525

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report a clinical experience of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for isolated recurrence in the prostatic bed from prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2011 and November 2013, 16 patients were treated with SBRT for a macroscopic isolated recurrence of prostate cancer in the prostatic bed. All patients were initially treated with radical prostatectomy, and half of them also received radiotherapy. Two schedules of SBRT were used: 30 Gy in 5 fractions in previously irradiated patients, 35 Gy in five fractions in radiotherapy-naïve patients. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 10 months (range 2-21 months), a significant biochemical response was found in all but one patient. At imaging evaluation, no local progression was noted: 10 patients showed partial response while four stable disease. At the moment of analysis, all 16 patients were alive. Seven of them experienced distant relapse, while nine maintained biochemical control, with no further therapy. Median time to relapse was 9.3 months (range 3-15.2 months). The treatment was well tolerated: One patient experienced G2 acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that SBRT with CyberKnife for isolated nodal relapse is a safe and well-tolerated treatment.


Subject(s)
Neoplasm Staging , Prostate/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiosurgery/methods , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Disease-Free Survival , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Positron-Emission Tomography , Prostate/radiation effects , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
2.
Cancer Invest ; 33(5): 188-92, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25831274

ABSTRACT

Cyberknife is an emerging treatment for early stage prostate cancer. Between October 2012 and January 2014, 32 patients were treated in our institution. Prescribed dose was 35-36.25 Gy in five fractions. Biochemical response was observed in 22 patients. Four patients experienced G2 acute genitourinary toxicity and in two cases we recorded G3 acute GU toxicity. 5 patients experienced G2 acute proctitis. At last follow up visit, all patients were still alive. 29 remained free of disease at last follow up appointment, while three developed a biochemical recurrence. Our experience confirms the efficacy and safety of Cyberknife for localized prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Radiosurgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prostate/pathology , Prostate/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Radiation Injuries
3.
World J Urol ; 33(8): 1197-203, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25342516

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report a clinical experience in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for isolated nodal metastases from prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2011 and December 2013, 30 patients (39 lesions) were treated with SBRT, delivered using Cyberknife, for recurrent prostate cancer with isolated nodal metastases. Prescribed doses and schedules of fractionation varied, ranging from 24 Gy in 1 fraction to 36 Gy in 3 fractions. Most commonly used schedules were 30 Gy in 3 fractions and 36 in Gy in 3 fractions on alternating days. Biochemical response, acute and late toxicity were analyzed. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 12 months (range 2-24.9), a significant reduction of PSA was observed in 24 cases, while PSA was stable in 1 case and raised in 9 cases. At the time of analysis, among the 30 patients treated, two were dead for systemic disease; 12 patients experienced a relapse of disease in other sites. Sixteen patients were still free of disease. In 24 cases, imaging evaluation 3 months after treatment was available. No in-field recurrence was detected. SBRT was well tolerated: One patient experienced G2 acute genitourinary toxicity. Late toxicity was evaluated in patients with more than 6 months of follow-up, and only one complained G1 proctitis. We did not observe any acute or late severe toxicity (≥G3). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that SBRT for isolated nodal relapse from prostate cancer is a safe treatment, with promising results in terms of efficacy.


Subject(s)
Lymph Node Excision/methods , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Radiosurgery/methods , Aged , Cohort Studies , Humans , Kallikreins/blood , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/blood , Pelvis , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Chemother ; 22(1): 58-62, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20227995

ABSTRACT

Ibandronate is an amino-bisphosphonate approved in metastatic breast cancer to reduce skeletal complications and to alleviate bone pain. we report our experience about the safety of oral ibandronate and review the literature.We treated 44 patients and administered 524 cycles of oral ibandronate (a single cycle was defined as a 50 mg capsule once daily for 28 days) with a median of 12 cycles (range 6-24). At a median follow-up of 18.5 months (range 6-28) the mean pain score decreased from 1.59 (SD+/-0.97) at baseline to 0.41 (SD+/-0.72) after 48 weeks of treatment. The mean analgesic score was 1.89 (SD+/-1.37) at baseline and 1.46 (SD+/-1.62) after 48 weeks of treatment. Ibandronate was generally well-tolerated; we had no Grade 3-4 adverse events. No patients had deterioration of renal function. No patients developed bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw. Our experience confirmed that ibandronate may be a useful and safe co-analgesic to conventional treatments for bone pain in selected metastatic breast cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Humans , Ibandronic Acid , Pain/drug therapy , Quality of Life
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...