Combining functional exercises with exercise training in COPD: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Increasing physical activity in daily life (PADL) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), mainly in short-term training programs, is still a challenge. The combination of functional exercises with aerobic and resistance training may be a strategy to improve PADL and limitations in activities of daily living (ADL) in COPD. OBJECTIVE: To evaluated the short- and medium-term effects of the combination of functional exercises with aerobic and resistance training. METHODS: Seventy-six patients were randomized into (1) functional training group who performed resistance and aerobic and functional exercises; (2) conventional training group (CTG) who performed resistance and aerobic exercise; or (3) usual care group who performed respiratory physiotherapy. Patients were evaluated for PADL (activity monitor), ADL limitations (London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale [LCADL]), functional exercise capacity (6-minute walk test [6MWT]), and peripheral muscle strength before and after eight weeks. Medium-term effects were evaluated 12 weeks after the training. RESULTS: There were no changes or differences between groups in PADL and in 6MWT post-intervention and 12 weeks post-training. Only CTG showed a reduction in the total score on LCADL scale after the intervention and increase at follow-up (score: 20 ± 8; 17 ± 6; 19 ± 8, pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 12 weeks post-training, respectively, p = 0.001), without differences between groups (p = 0.375). There were increases in the muscle strength of knee flexors (p = 0.016) and extensors (p < 0.001) after the intervention only in CTG. CONCLUSIONS: Combined aerobic and resistance training with functional exercises failed to improve PADL and ADL limitations in COPD. Eight weeks of conventional training improved ADL. This, however, was not superior to the results from the other groups and was not sustained at medium-term 12 weeks post-training.

Resistance training using different elastic components offers similar gains on muscle strength to weight machine equipment in Individuals with COPD: A randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: To compare the effects of three modalities of resistance training, two using elastic components and one using conventional weight machine on peripheral muscle strength in Individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Effects on exercise capacity, impact of disease on health status, body composition and daily level of physical activity were investigated as secondary endpoints.Methods: Forty-eight participants were randomly allocated (Trials Registry #RBR-6V9SJJ) into Elastic band group (Theraband®) (EBG), Elastic tubes training using Lemgruber® (ETG), and Conventional training with weight machine equipment (CG). Participants were evaluated before and after 12 weeks of training regarding peripheral muscle strength by dynamometry; impact of disease on health status via COPD Assessment Test, CAT; exercise capacity by 6-min walk test, 6MWT; body composition by bioelectrical impedance; and daily level of physical activities via accelerometry.Results: Inter-group comparison of training effects did not elucidate significant differences between the modalities in muscle strength (p ≥ .2). Likewise, all training modalities showed similar effects on CAT, body composition and daily physical activity variables with no statistical significance observed (p ≥ .15).Conclusions: Modalities of resistance training using elastic components presented similar effects on muscle strength, health status, exercise capacity, body composition and daily level of physical activity in individuals with COPD. The effects of elastic resistance were similar to conventional resistance training.

Energy expenditure during daily activities as measured by two motion sensors in patients with COPD.

BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), energy expenditure (EE) assessment during the performance of daily activities is not yet studied in depth. The aim of this study was to determine which daily activities are more demanding to patients with COPD and to compare the accuracy of EE estimation given by the pedometer Digiwalker SW701 (DW) and the multisensor SenseWear Armband (SAB). METHODS: Thirty-six patients with COPD (20 men; FEV1 48 ± 15%predicted; BMI 25.7 ± 8 kg/m(2)) were submitted to a modified version of the Glittre ADL-test, which included five activities performed for 1 min each: walking on the level, walking on the level carrying a backpack, walking up/downstairs, rising/sitting in chairs and moving objects in and out of a shelf. During the protocol subjects wore both devices concomitantly, and indirect calorimetry (IC) was simultaneously performed as the criterion method to assess EE. RESULTS: The most demanding daily activity for individuals with COPD was walking up/downstairs (4.9 ± 1.7 kcal versus 3.7 ± 1.4 to 4.2 ± 1.8 kcal for the other tasks; p < 0.05). EE estimation by the SAB did not show difference in comparison to IC for the sum of the five activities (SAB = 22.7 ± 7 kcal versus IC = 21 ± 8 kcal; p > 0.05), although overestimation was found in activities involving walking. DW showed significant EE underestimation in the sum of the activities (9.6 ± 4.3 kcal; p < 0.05 versus IC) and for each activity. CONCLUSION: Walking up/downstairs was the most energy-demanding daily activity for patients with COPD. Furthermore, during daily activities, the multisensor showed adequate overall estimation of energy expenditure, as opposed to the pedometer.

Improvement of heart rate variability after exercise training and its predictors in COPD.

BACKGROUND: Current literature lacks solid evidence on the improvement of heart rate variability (HRV) after exercise training in patients with COPD. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate changes in HRV after two exercise training programs in patients with COPD and to investigate the determinants of these eventual changes. METHODS: Forty patients with COPD (FEV(1) 39 ± 13%pred) were randomized into high (n = 20) or low (n = 20) intensity exercise training (3-month duration), and had their HRV assessed by the head-up tilt test before and after either protocols. Baseline spirometry, level of daily physical activity, exercise capacity, body composition, functional status, health-related quality of life and muscle force were also assessed to investigate the determinants of improvement in HRV after the training program. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in HRV only after the high-intensity protocol (pre versus post; SDNN 29 ± 15 ms versus 36 ± 19 ms; rMSSD 22 ± 14 ms versus 28 ± 22 ms; p < 0.05 for both). Higher values of biceps brachialis strength, time spent walking in daily life and SDNN at baseline were determinants of improvement in HRV after the training program. CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity exercise training improves HRV at rest and during orthostatic stimulus in patients with COPD. Better baseline total HRV, muscle force and daily physical activity level are predictors of HRV improvements after the training program.