Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Microvasc Res ; 102: 1-5, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26211848

ABSTRACT

The regulation of cutaneous vascular tone impacts vascular vasomotion and blood volume distribution as a challenge to hypoxia, but the regulatory mechanisms yet remain poorly understood. A skin has a very compliant circulation, an increase in skin blood flow results in large peripheral displacement of blood volume, which could be controlled by local and systemic regulatory factors. The aim of this study was to determine the acute systemic hypoxia influence on blood flow in skin, local regulatory mechanism fluctuations and changes of systemic hemodynamic parameters. Healthy subjects (n=11; 24.9±3.7years old) participated in this study and procedures were performed in siting position. After 20min of acclimatization 15min of basal resting period in normoxia (pO2=21%) was recorded, followed by 20min in acute systemic hypoxia (pO2=12%), and after 15min of recovery period in normoxia (pO2=21%). HRV was used to evaluate autonomic nervous system activity to heart from systemic hemodynamic parameters which continuously evaluated cardiac output, total peripheral resistance and mean arterial blood pressure. Regional blood flow was evaluated by venous occlusion plethysmography and skin blood flow by laser-Doppler flowmetry. To evaluate local factor influences to cutaneous circulation wavelet analysis was used; fluctuations in the frequency intervals of 0.0095-0.021, 0.021-0.052, and 0.052-0.145Hz correspondingly represent endothelial, sympathetic, and myogenic activities. Our results from HRV data suggest that acute systemic hypoxia causes statistically significant increase of sympathetic (LF/HF; N1=0.46±0.25 vs. H=0.67±0.36; P=0.027) and decrease of parasympathetic (RMSSD; 80.0±43.1 vs. H=69.9±40.4, ms; P=0.009) outflow to heart. Acute hypoxia causes statistically significant increase of heart rate (RR interval; N1=960.3±174.5 vs. H=864.7±134.6, ms; P=0.001) and cardiac output (CO; N1=5.4 (5.2; 7.9) vs. H=6.7±1.4, l/min; P=0.020). Regional blood flow and vascular conductance were not changed during acute systemic hypoxia, but forearm skin blood flow (skin blood flow; N1=39.7 (34.0; 53.2) vs. H=51.6±13.9, PU; P=0.002) increases however local regulatory factor activity was not changed by acute systemic hypoxia. Acute systemic hypoxia causes sympathetic stimulation to heart which results in increased heart rate and larger cardiac output which could be the reason of forearm skin blood flow increase in acute systemic hypoxia without impact of local regulatory factors.


Subject(s)
Hypoxia/physiopathology , Microcirculation/physiology , Skin/blood supply , Acute Disease , Adult , Cardiac Output , Endothelium, Vascular/physiopathology , Female , Heart Rate , Humans , Male , Regional Blood Flow , Skin/innervation , Sympathetic Nervous System/physiopathology , Vasodilation , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...