ABSTRACT
The proliferative activity of breast tumors, which is routinely estimated by counting of mitotic figures in hematoxylin and eosin stained histology sections, is considered to be one of the most important prognostic markers. However, mitosis counting is laborious, subjective and may suffer from low inter-observer agreement. With the wider acceptance of whole slide images in pathology labs, automatic image analysis has been proposed as a potential solution for these issues. In this paper, the results from the Assessment of Mitosis Detection Algorithms 2013 (AMIDA13) challenge are described. The challenge was based on a data set consisting of 12 training and 11 testing subjects, with more than one thousand annotated mitotic figures by multiple observers. Short descriptions and results from the evaluation of eleven methods are presented. The top performing method has an error rate that is comparable to the inter-observer agreement among pathologists.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Mitosis , Female , Humans , Observer VariationABSTRACT
The automatic reconstruction of neurons from stacks of electron microscopy sections is an important computer vision problem in neuroscience. Recent advances are based on a two step approach: First, a set of possible 2D neuron candidates is generated for each section independently based on membrane predictions of a local classifier. Second, the candidates of all sections of the stack are fed to a neuron tracker that selects and connects them in 3D to yield a reconstruction. The accuracy of the result is currently limited by the quality of the generated candidates. In this paper, we propose to replace the heuristic set of candidates used in previous methods with samples drawn from a conditional random field (CRF) that is trained to label sections of neural tissue. We show on a stack of Drosophila melanogaster neural tissue that neuron candidates generated with our method produce 30% less reconstruction errors than current candidate generation methods. Two properties of our CRF are crucial for the accuracy and applicability of our method: (1) The CRF models the orientation of membranes to produce more plausible neuron candidates. (2) The interactions in the CRF are restricted to form a bipartite graph, which allows a great sampling speed-up without loss of accuracy.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Microscopy, Electron/methods , Pattern Recognition, Automated/methods , Subtraction Technique , Animals , Anisotropy , Cells, Cultured , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Drosophila melanogaster , Image Enhancement/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sample Size , Sensitivity and Specificity , Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedABSTRACT
We use deep max-pooling convolutional neural networks to detect mitosis in breast histology images. The networks are trained to classify each pixel in the images, using as context a patch centered on the pixel. Simple postprocessing is then applied to the network output. Our approach won the ICPR 2012 mitosis detection competition, outperforming other contestants by a significant margin.
