Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Review of Complications Related to All-Trans Retinoic Acid and Arsenic Trioxide Therapy.

The hallmark of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is the presence of the characteristic fusion transcript of the promyelocytic leukemia gene with the retinoic acid receptor α gene (PML::RARA). The PML::RARA fusion is a molecular target for all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO). Therapies based on ATRA plus ATO have excellent outcomes in terms of complete remission rates, overall survival, and achievement of deep and durable molecular responses with a very low incidence of relapse. However, although the combination of ATRA and ATO has lower hematologic toxicity than standard chemotherapy, its use is associated with a spectrum of distinctive toxicities, such as differentiation syndrome, liver toxicity, QT interval prolongation, and neurotoxicity. Rigorous monitoring of patients' clinical evolution is indispensable for identifying and addressing each complication. The objective is to maintain an equilibrium between treatment-induced adverse events and therapeutic efficacy. This paper focused on non-hematologic complications associated with the combination of ATRA and ATO. Additionally, we discuss late-onset complications of this therapy. In summary, the majority of treatment-related adverse events are manageable, self-limiting, and reversible. More so, there seems to be a lower incidence rate of secondary neoplasms compared to standard chemotherapy. However, further research is required to assess how the ATRA plus ATO regimen affects the emergence of additional comorbidities.

Case report: High-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia and COVID-19-related myocarditis one patient, two cytokine storms.

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a unique, highly curable subtype of acute myeloid leukemia, owing to the therapeutic advances of the last decades which led to high complete remission rates and excellent long-term survival. Nevertheless, it remains associated with high early mortality rates. Early death is the major cause of treatment failure in APL and is mainly attributed to coagulopathy, differentiation syndrome, and less commonly, infectious events. Timely recognition of each complication plays a crucial role in the management of patients diagnosed with APL. Coronavirus Infectious Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has shown great heterogeneity in patient presentation. Clinical manifestations range from asymptomatic disease to severe forms, mainly characterized by a hyperinflammatory syndrome leading to acute respiratory distress and multiorgan failure. Patients with acute leukemia and concomitant COVID-19-related hyperinflammatory syndrome have particularly poor outcomes. We hereby report the case of a 28-year-old male patient who was diagnosed with high-risk APL, with severe associated coagulopathy at presentation. He was treated with chemotherapy according to the AIDA regimen. The first week of induction therapy was complicated by a differentiation syndrome manifesting as fever not attributable to infection and respiratory distress with pulmonary infiltrates, resolved after ATRA discontinuation and corticotherapy. On the fourth week of treatment, he tested positive for acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) with minor pulmonary involvement. Clinical manifestations over the following days included tachycardia and hypotension, associated with elevated inflammatory markers and cardiac biomarkers (troponin I x58 upper NV). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging was consistent with myocarditis. COVID-19-associated myocarditis was successfully treated with methylprednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulins and Anakinra. Differentiation syndrome and COVID-19-associated myocarditis are two life-threatening complications that adversely impact survival. However, early recognition and prompt treatment initiation can improve clinical outcomes, as was the case of our patient.

Real-World Clinical Outcomes and Adverse Events in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated with Ibrutinib: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Background and Objectives: The treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has acquired new targeted therapies. In clinical trials, ibrutinib improved outcomes safely. Real-world data called for a reappraisal of ibrutinib strategies. We report on a single center's experience with ibrutinib monotherapy, aiming to explore the outcomes, tolerability, and prognosis of CLL patients in routine clinical practice. Materials and Methods: Data were collected from all CLL patients treated with ibrutinib at Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania, between January 2016 and June 2021. Results: A total of one hundred twenty-three CLL adult patients were treated with ibrutinib. Of the patients, 87% had relapsed/refractory CLL. The median age at ibrutinib initiation was 65 years; 44.7% of patients were staged Rai III/IV. At 32-month median follow-up, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 50 months, the overall survival (OS) was not reached, and the overall response rate (ORR) was 86.2%. The age or number of previous therapies did not impact outcomes or tolerability. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score ≥ 2 and shorter time from initiation of last therapy (TILT) before ibrutinib predicted inferior PFS. Baseline characteristics had no impact on the OS except for TILT in R/R CLL patients. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade and grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported in 82.1% and 30.9% of the patients, respectively. Infections were the most common AEs (29.3%). Drug discontinuation was permanent in 43.9% of patients, mainly due to disease progression (17.1%) and toxicity (8.9%). Patients with a Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) score ≥ 6 had a higher risk for toxicity-related discontinuation. An ECOG PS ≥ 2 predicted an increased rate of permanent discontinuation and grade ≥ 3 AEs. Conclusions: The outcomes of this study align with the results from ibrutinib clinical trials. Our study demonstrated that poor patient fitness, early relapse before ibrutinib, and permanent ibrutinib discontinuation are essential outcome determinants. Patient comorbidity burden and fitness were significant predictors for ibrutinib intolerance.

N-Acetylaspartate Biomarker of Stroke Recovery: A Case Series Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Strong experimental neurobehavioral evidence suggests that intensive training improves arm motor disability after stroke. Yet, we still have only limited understanding why some patients recover more completely and others do not. This is in part due to our limited knowledge of the neurobiological principles of recovery from stroke. Mounting evidence suggests that functional and structural remapping of the primary motor cortex (M1) plays a major role in arm recovery after stroke. We used MR Spectroscopy to test the hypothesis that therapy-related arm improvement is associated with changes in levels of a putative marker of neuronal integrity (N-acetylaspartate, NAA) in M1 controlling the paretic arm (ipsilesional M1) in chronic stroke patients (n=5). METHODS: Patients (1 female, age, mean ± SD, 58.4 ± 5.8 years) underwent 4-week arm-focused motor training (1080 repetitions of a reach-to-grasp task) at 13.6 ± 5.3 months after stroke onset. NAA levels in the ipsilesional M1 and arm impairment (Fugl-Meyer, FM, 66=normal; proximal FM, FMp, 30=normal) were assessed prior to and immediately after training. RESULTS: At baseline, patients exhibited moderate-to-mild arm impairment (FM, 47.2 ± 18.8, FMp, 22.2 ± 8.6) and showed lower levels of NAA compared with age/sex-matched healthy controls (10.2 ± 0.9 mM in patients vs. 11.6 ± 1.6 mM in controls, p=0.03). After training, arm impairment improved (FM by 7%, 50.6 ± 17.5, p=0.01; FMp, by 5%, 23.4 ± 8.2, p=0.2) and NAA levels increased by 10.5% (11.2 ± 1.2 mM, p=0.1). Changes in NAA positively correlated with changes in FM (r=0.63, p=0.2) and FMp (r=0.93, p=0.03), suggesting that patients who show greater neuronal changes have a better chance of recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest the potential use of M1 NAA as a biomarker of motor recovery after stroke. However, because of our small sample, these preliminary results should be interpreted cautiously. Further work with larger sample sizes is warranted.