The effect of age and clinical circumstances on the outcome of red blood cell transfusion in critically ill patients.

INTRODUCTION: Whether red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is beneficial remains controversial. In both retrospective and prospective evaluations, transfusion has been associated with adverse, neutral, or protective effects. These varying results likely stem from a complex interplay between transfusion, patient characteristics, and clinical context. The objective was to test whether age, comorbidities, and clinical context modulate the effect of transfusion on survival. METHODS: By using the multiparameter intelligent monitoring in intensive care II database (v. 2.6), a retrospective analysis of 9,809 critically ill patients, we evaluated the effect of RBC transfusion on 30-day and 1-year mortality. Propensity score modeling and logistic regression adjusted for known confounding and assessed the independent effect of transfusion on 30-day and 1-year mortality. Sensitivity analysis was performed by using 3,164 transfused and non-transfused pairs, matched according the previously validated propensity model for RBC transfusion. RESULTS: RBC transfusion did not affect 30-day or 1-year mortality in the overall cohort. Patients younger than 55 years had increased odds of mortality (OR, 1.71; P < 0.01) with transfusion. Patients older than 75 years had lower odds of 30-day and 1-year mortality (OR, 0.70; P < 0.01) with transfusion. Transfusion was associated with worse outcome among patients undergoing cardiac surgery (OR, 2.1; P < 0.01). The propensity-matched population corroborated findings identified by regression adjustment. CONCLUSION: A complex relation exists between RBC transfusion and clinical outcome. Our results show that transfusion is associated with improved outcomes in some cohorts and worse outcome in others, depending on comorbidities and patient characteristics. As such, future investigations and clinical decisions evaluating the value of transfusion should account for variations in baseline characteristics and clinical context.

Missing data in medical databases: impute, delete or classify?

BACKGROUND: The multiplicity of information sources for data acquisition in modern intensive care units (ICUs) makes the resulting databases particularly susceptible to missing data. Missing data can significantly affect the performance of predictive risk modeling, an important technique for developing medical guidelines. The two most commonly used strategies for managing missing data are to impute or delete values, and the former can cause bias, while the later can cause both bias and loss of statistical power. OBJECTIVES: In this paper we present a new approach for managing missing data in ICU databases in order to improve overall modeling performance. METHODS: We use a statistical classifier followed by fuzzy modeling to more accurately determine which missing data should be imputed and which should not. We firstly develop a simulation test bed to evaluate performance, and then translate that knowledge using exactly the same database as previously published work by [13]. RESULTS: In this work, test beds resulted in datasets with missing data ranging 10-50%. Using this new approach to missing data we are able to significantly improve modeling performance parameters such as accuracy of classifications by an 11%, sensitivity by 13%, and specificity by 10%, including also area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC) improvement of up to 13%. CONCLUSIONS: In this work, we improve modeling performance in a simulated test bed, and then confirm improved performance replicating previously published work by using the proposed approach for missing data classification. We offer this new method to other researchers who wish to improve predictive risk modeling performance in the ICU through advanced missing data management.