ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To identify reasons for inclusion of international practice experiences in pharmacy curricula and to understand the related structure, benefits, and challenges related to the programs. METHODS: A convenience sample of 20 colleges and schools of pharmacy in the United States with international pharmacy education programs was used. Telephone interviews were conducted by 2 study investigators. RESULTS: University values and strategic planning were among key driving forces in the development of programs. Global awareness and cultural competency requirements added impetus to program development. Participants' advice for creating an international practice experience program included an emphasis on the value of working with university health professions programs and established travel programs. CONCLUSION: Despite challenges, colleges and schools of pharmacy value the importance of international pharmacy education for pharmacy students as it increases global awareness of health needs and cultural competencies.
Subject(s)
Education, Pharmacy/organization & administration , Internationality , Schools, Pharmacy/statistics & numerical data , Students, Pharmacy , Cultural Competency , Curriculum , Data Collection , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Program Development , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether changes occur over 1 academic year in pharmacy students' critical thinking skills and disposition to think critically. METHODS: First, second, third, and fourth-year pharmacy students completed the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST) and the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI) at the beginning and end of 1 academic year. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven students completed the study. No significant changes occurred over the year in total scores on either instrument. However, scores in 3 of 12 subscale scores changed significantly and several significant correlations were found. CONCLUSION: Pharmacy students' scores on 2 critical thinking instruments showed no major improvements over 1 academic year but most scores were above average. Some areas of possible weakness were identified. Additional studies comparing scores over a longer period of time (eg, admission to graduation) are needed.
