Oral immunotherapy with peach juice in patients allergic to LTPs.

INTRODUCTION: To assess the safety and efficacy of an oral immunotherapy regimen in patients with allergy to lipid transfer proteins (LTPs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective study of 24 patients allergic to LTP with positive skin test and a history of anaphylaxis. All patients underwent a desensitization protocol with commercial peach juice. Rising doses of peach juice were administered, starting with an initial dose of seven drops of a 1/1000 dilution and finishing with a dose of 5 ml at visit 17. At visit 18, all patients performed an open challenge with whole juice at a cumulative dose of 200 ml. All adverse reactions occurring during the administration of the different doses were recorded. Levels of rPru p 3 in the juice were quantified. RESULTS: There were no severe reactions during the desensitization process in the 24 patients. Seven patients (29%) reported mild oral symptoms, and two patients (8%) had urticaria associated with co-factors (one due to exercise and another due to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Nineteen patients were able to swallow 5 ml of juice and five withdrew from the study. In two pregnant patients the final challenge was not performed. In all, 17/24 patients were able to consume 200 ml peach juice without developing symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Oral immunotherapy with the regimen used in this study is an effective and safe short-term therapeutic option for patients with allergy to LTPs. Commercial peach juice appears to be suitable for this treatment.

Comparison of IgE-binding capacity, cross-reactivity and biological potency of allergenic non-specific lipid transfer proteins from peach, cherry and hazelnut.

BACKGROUND: Whether the observed clinical pattern of non-specific lipid transfer protein (nsLTP)-mediated food allergies is attributable to a primary sensitization by Pru p 3 from peach and subsequent cross-reactivity with Rosaceae- and non-Rosaceae-derived foods expressing homologous allergens is still unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the allergenic properties of nsLTPs from Rosaceae and non-Rosaceae foods. METHODS: In peach-, cherry- or hazelnut-allergic patients, prevalence of sensitization, IgE-binding capacity, cross-reactivity and allergenic potency of Pru p 3 was compared with Pru av 3 (cherry) and Cor a 8 (hazelnut). RESULTS: Frequency of sensitization to corresponding nsLTPs was 88, 85, and 77% in peach-, hazelnut- and cherry-allergic patients, respectively. Concomitant allergic reactions to cherry and hazelnut were reported in 51 and 44% of peach-allergic patients, respectively. In contrast to cherry allergy, hazelnut allergy was not strictly associated to peach allergy. Sensitization to Cor a 8 or Pru av 3 was strongly correlated with IgE reactivity to Pru p 3, even when subjects tolerated peach. Specific IgE was highest for Rosaceae LTPs, and cross-inhibition experiments confirmed a stronger IgE-binding capacity of Pru p 3 than Cor a 8. The biological potency of Pru p 3 and Pru av 3 was similar but stronger for both nsLTPs than that of Cor a 8. CONCLUSION: Clinical cross-reactivity of food-allergic patients in the Mediterranean area is likely attributed to a primary sensitization to Pru p 3 and serological cross-reactivity with homologous food nsLTPs. In comparison to Cor a 8, Rosaceae nsLTPs showed a stronger IgE-binding capacity and allergenic potency indicating a different epitope pattern.

Sensitization to Alternaria in patients with respiratory allergy.

Alternaria alternata (AA) is an important mould in respiratory allergic diseases. The objective is to determine the prevalence of AA sensitization in respiratory allergic patients and to examine the annual variation of Alternaria spores. 824 patients between 5 and 65 years old with allergic rhinitis and /or asthma were enrolled. Prick tests were performed with two different standardized AA extracts with quantification of Alt a 1. Alternaria spores concentrations were provided. 151 patients (18.3%) were sensitized to AA. The patients sensitized to AA were affected more frequently by asthma when compared to the patients not sensitized to AA (chi-square test = 7.34; p = 0.003). The prevalence of AA sensitization in paediatric population was statistically significantly higher than in patients older than 13. Atmospheric levels of Alternaria spores showed two periods of maximum concentration: July/August and October/November. The sensitization prevalence of AA in patients with respiratory allergy is meaningful, fundamentally in paediatric patients and/or allergic asthma patients. There is a significance spore concentration of Alternaria in the studied area, with a seasonal behaviour.

Conjunctivitis and Total IgE in Lacrimal Fluid: Lacrytest Screening.

Total tear IgE has been considered to play an important role in allergic conjunctivitis, and measurement has been considered useful for diagnosis. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether Lacrytest(®), a new commercialised method to detect IgE levels in lacrimal fluid, could constitute a screening test for the diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis. This was a cross-sectional study. Patients with seasonal and perennial allergic conjunctivitis, vernal keratoconjunctivitis and a control group were included. Clinical history, ophthalmic examination, skin prick test and conjunctival provocation test were obtained. Lacrytest(®) was later performed in all groups. Fifty-four patients were enrolled: thirty with IgE-mediated conjunctivitis and, nine with vernal keratoconjunctivitis and fifteen controls. Lacrytest(®) was negative in all controls, positive in 20% of the IgE-mediated conjunctivitis group and in 88.9% of the vernal keratoconjunctivitis group. Global statistically-significant differences were found among the three groups (P = .003). Sensitivity of the test in the IgE-mediated conjunctivitis group was 20%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 38.46%, while in VKC sensitivity was 88.88%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 93.75%. Our data confirm that this test is not useful for screening allergic conjunctivitis. Lacrytest(®), while not providing any useful information to an allergist, could be helpful for ophthalmologists to confirm an IgE-mediated or VKC conjunctivitis.

Allergy to human seminal fluid: cross-reactivity with dog dander.

BACKGROUND: Human seminal plasma (HSP) allergy is uncommon, with symptoms ranging from vulvovaginal pruritus to life-threatening anaphylaxis. Although several seminal plasma allergens have been reported and their molecular masses have been estimated to range between 12 and 75 kd, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has recently been identified as a causative allergen. Given that in a large number of cases symptoms appeared during or after the first intercourse, a cross-reactivity phenomenon might be implicated. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the presence of IgE cross-reactivity among proteins from dog epithelium and HSP and to attempt to identify the allergens involved. METHODS: Forty-one patients with dog epithelium allergy were selected. One of them experienced anaphylaxis in contact with her husband's seminal plasma. Skin prick tests, serum specific IgE measurements, SDS-PAGE immunoblotting, and inhibition tests were performed to study the pattern of IgE-binding proteins and the potential cross-reactivity between HSP and dog epithelium. Mass spectrometry was carried out to identify the protein involved in allergy reactions. RESULTS: Twenty-four percent of the sera from patients with dog epithelium allergy recognized an IgE-binding band of 28 kd in HSP immunoblotting. Mass spectrometry identified this band as the PSA. SDS-PAGE immunoblotting-inhibition showed a complete IgE-binding inhibition when sera from these patients were preincubated with dog dander extract. CONCLUSIONS: IgE cross-reactivity among proteins from dog dander and human PSA is demonstrated.

Molecular characterisation of Lac s 1, the major allergen from lettuce (Lactuca sativa).

BACKGROUND: IgE sensitisation to non-specific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTP), e.g., Pru p 3 the major allergen from peach and most important allergenic LTP, is strongly associated with severe symptoms in food allergic patients. Lac s 1, a member of the nsLTP protein family, was recently identified as major allergen in lettuce (Lactuca sativa), but has not yet been investigated on the molecular basis. OBJECTIVE: Molecular characterisation and immunological comparison of Lac s 1 to peach allergen Pru p 3. METHODS: Lac s 1 cDNA was cloned by RT-PCR and natural (n) Lac s 1 was purified by a two-step chromatography. Protein structure was verified by N-terminal sequencing, mass spectrometry, and circular dichroism spectroscopy. Immunoblotting, ImmunoCAP, and competitive IgE binding experiments were performed to study the IgE sensitisation pattern and cross-reactivity with Pru p 3. Allergenic potency was analysed by histamine release assay. RESULTS: Twenty-nine lettuce allergic patients, with or without concomitant peach allergy, and 19 peach allergic patients without lettuce allergy were included in this study. IgE reactivity to lettuce was due to mono-sensitisation to Lac s 1 or cross-reactive glycan structures. Two Lac s 1 isoforms were identified which showed amino acid identity (aa-id) of 62% to each other, up to 66% to Pru p 3, and 72% to the N-terminal peptide of plane pollen LTP Pla a 3. The prevalence of IgE binding to nLac s 1 was 90% using lettuce extract in immunoblotting experiments. Enhanced sensitivity was observed in ImmunoCAP using purified nLac s 1 in comparison to extracts (93% versus 76%). Although IgE sensitisation to Lac s 1 and Pru p 3 was strongly associated, the two LTPs showed different IgE binding properties. Sensitisation to LTPs does not necessarily reflect the clinical disease, but Lac s 1 was capable of triggering histamine release as shown by positive skin test results in Lac s 1 mono-sensitised patients and by in vitro mediator release assays. CONCLUSION: Purified nLac s 1 will enhance the sensitivity in component resolved diagnosis of lettuce allergy. Similar to other cross-reactive food allergies, exclusive testing of IgE reactivities to LTP cannot be used as biomarker for clinical relevance. Our data provide indirect evidence that Pru p 3 might act as the primary sensitising agent in patients allergic to both lettuce and peach.

Relevance of the recombinant lipid transfer protein of Hevea brasiliensis: IgE-binding reactivity in fruit-allergic adults.

BACKGROUND: Lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) are relevant allergens in certain plants. The role of the LTP of Hevea brasiliensis in the latex-fruit syndrome is widely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To study IgE reactivity with recombinant Hevea LTP in sera of fruit-allergic adults with and without natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy. METHODS: An LTP-specific complementary DNA of H brasiliensis leaves was amplified, subcloned into the pMAL expression system, and analyzed. The recombinant protein was coupled to ImmunoCAP, and the IgE-binding properties were studied in sera of 10 NRL-allergic patients without symptoms to fruit and 48 atopic patients with fruit allergy. Eleven of these 48 patients were also allergic to NRL, 14 displayed sensitization to NRL without symptoms on NRL exposure so far, and 23 had neither symptoms nor IgE antibodies to NRL. RESULTS: After expression in Escherichia coli, a soluble maltose-binding protein-rHev b 12 fusion protein was isolated and coupled to ImmunoCAP to determine rHev b 12 specific IgE reactivity. rHev b 12 specific IgE binding was found in 3 fruit-allergic patients with NRL sensitization (0.68, 0.88, and 0.96 kU/L) and in 3 fruit-allergic patients without NRL sensitization (1.58, 2.25, and 2.27 kU/L). The remaining 52 serum samples and all maltose-binding protein control test results were negative (< 0.35 kU/L). CONCLUSIONS: In these patients, rHev b 12 specific IgE reactivity seems to result from common cross-reactive epitopes with some of the fruit LTPs tested and underscores only an involvement in co-recognition. No clinical relevance of IgE binding to the LTP of H brasiliensis in association with NRL allergy was detected.

Specific immunotherapy for food allergy: basic principles and clinical aspects.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Food allergy may be life threatening and its management continues to consist of avoiding relevant allergens and, in the case of accidental ingestion, initiation of appropriate emergency therapy. The aim of this article is to describe current treatment approaches and discuss attempts to use specific immunotherapy for food-allergy treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: A recent study reports the use of sublingual immunotherapy for hazelnut food allergy in hazelnut-allergic patients. A significant increase in tolerance to hazelnuts after sublingual immunotherapy as assessed by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, and good tolerance to this treatment, have been observed. SUMMARY: The purpose of this review is to highlight the most promising novel approaches for treating food allergy beyond allergen avoidance. Some of these approaches alone, such as traditional Chinese herbal medicine, anti-immunoglobulin E therapy or sublingual immunotherapy for food allergy, or the combination of different approaches, would probably offer the best treatment option for food-allergic patients in the near future.

Aspirin desensitization in the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome during pregnancy in ASA-sensitive patients.

PROBLEM: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is associated with thrombosis and poor pregnancy outcome in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Patients with aPL have a high risk of foetal loss. However, with low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid; ASA) in combination with subcutaneous heparin, the chances of full-term delivery increase. Nevertheless, ASA treatment is avoided in pregnant, ASA-sensitive women with APS. METHODS: Rapid oral challenge-desensitization to ASA was performed in four pregnant women with a history of APS and aspirin sensitivity. In three patients, desensitization was performed during pregnancy and before the next pregnancy in the fourth. Desensitization was carried out in the ICU using increasing doses of aspirin (0.1-125 mg) over a 24-hr period. RESULTS: Successful ASA desensitization was achieved in all the patients. No severe side effects occurred during the desensitization test. Only one patient required a small oral dose of antihistamines. CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin desensitization may be a safe alternative even during pregnancy if carefully monitored and permit patients with APS to receive treatment with ASA. This would constitute a new indication in pregnant women with APS and ASA sensitivity.

Sublingual immunotherapy for hazelnut food allergy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a standardized hazelnut extract.

BACKGROUND: Food allergy may be life-threatening, and patients affected need to receive accurate diagnoses and treatment. Hazelnut has often been implicated as responsible for allergic reactions, and trace quantities can induce systemic reactions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of sublingual immunotherapy with a standardized hazelnut extract in patients allergic to hazelnut. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Inclusion criteria were a history of hazelnut allergy and positive skin prick test and double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge results. Patients were then randomly assigned into 2 treatment groups (hazelnut immunotherapy or placebo). Efficacy was assessed by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge after 8 to 12 weeks of treatment. Blood samples were drawn for measurement of specific IgE, IgG(4), and serum cytokines before and after treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled and divided into 2 treatment groups. Twenty-two patients reached the planned maximum dose at 4 days. Systemic reactions were observed in only 0.2% of the total doses administered. Mean hazelnut quantity provoking objective symptoms increased from 2.29 g to 11.56 g (P = .02; active group) versus 3.49 g to 4.14 g (placebo; NS). Moreover, almost 50% of patients who underwent active treatment reached the highest dose (20 g), but only 9% in the placebo. Laboratory data showed an increase in IgG(4) and IL-10 levels after immunotherapy in only the active group. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm significant increases in tolerance to hazelnut after sublingual immunotherapy as assessed by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, and good tolerance to this treatment.

Strong allergenicity of Pru av 3, the lipid transfer protein from cherry, is related to high stability against thermal processing and digestion.

BACKGROUND: Nonspecific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTPs) have been identified as major fruit allergens in patients from the Mediterranean area. Sensitization to nsLTPs is accompanied by severe reactions, possibly because of specific biophysical and biochemical properties of this allergen family. OBJECTIVE: To assess the protein stability and allergenic potency of nsLTP from fruits in comparison with birch pollen-related allergens from the same allergenic source. METHODS: Stability of natural and recombinant cherry allergens Pru av 3 (nsLTP), Pru av 1 (Bet v 1 homologue), and Pru av 4 (profilin) to pepsin digestion and to thermal processing and stability of allergens in skin prick test reagents was investigated by immunoblotting and/or circular dichroism spectroscopy. Moreover, allergenicity of processed and fresh fruits in regard to Pru av 1 and Pru av 3 was analyzed by histamine release assays. RESULTS: Lipid transfer proteins showed the highest resistance to digestion by pepsin (rPru av 3 > rPru av 1 > rPru av 4). Immunologically active Pru av 3 was detectable after 2 hours of digestion by pepsin, whereas IgE reactivity of Pru av 1 and Pru av 4 was abolished within less than 60 minutes. In contrast with Pru av 1, IgE reactivity to nsLTPs was not diminished in thermally processed fruits, and secondary structures of purified Pru av 3 were more resistant to heating. Moreover, nsLTPs were stable components in skin prick test reagents. Histamine release assays confirmed the strong allergenicity of nsLTPs, which was not affected by protease treatment or thermal processing of fruits. CONCLUSION: In contrast with birch pollen-related allergens, nsLTPs are highly stable to pepsin treatment and thermal processing and show higher allergenic potency. Therefore, nsLTPs have the potential to act as true food allergens, probably eliciting severe systemic reactions by reaching the intestinal mucosa in an intact and fully active form.

Recombinant lipid transfer protein Cor a 8 from hazelnut: a new tool for in vitro diagnosis of potentially severe hazelnut allergy.

BACKGROUND: Cor a 1.04 has been identified as the major hazelnut allergen in 65 European patients with positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge results to hazelnut. Recently, the 11S globulin Cor a 9 was shown to be a pollen-independent hazelnut allergen in the United States, whereas preliminary data suggest the lipid transfer protein (LTP) as an important birch pollen-unrelated hazelnut allergen in Europe. OBJECTIVE: We sought to recruit a group of European patients allergic to hazelnut without birch pollen allergy and to identify and clone the major food allergen(s) in this study population. METHODS: We recruited 26 such Spanish patients, including 10 patients with anaphylaxis. IgE immunoblotting was performed with hazelnut extract. Hazelnut LTP Cor a 8 was cloned by using a PCR strategy, purified, and subjected to IgE immunoblotting. Recombinant Cor a 8, rCor a 1.0401, and rCor a 2 (profilin) were further investigated by means of enzyme allergosorbent test. Immunoblot inhibition experiments were used to compare the immunologic properties of natural and recombinant LTP. RESULTS: A 9-kd major allergen was identified in hazelnut extract. Cloning, sequencing, heterologous expression, and inhibition experiments identified it as an LTP. The prevalence of specific IgE antibody reactivity to LTP was 62% in hazelnut extract and 77% when recombinant LTP was tested by means of immunoblotting. IgE immunoblot inhibition with hazelnut extract showed that natural Cor a 8 and rCor a 8 shared identical epitopes. Only one patient had positive reactivity to Cor a 1.04, and no patients had positive reactivity to Cor a 2. Two sera bound to high-molecular-weight allergens. The LTP was denominated as Cor a 8 and submitted to the allergen database of the World Health Organization/International Union of Immunological Societies Allergen Nomenclature Subcommittee. CONCLUSIONS: Cor a 8 is a relevant allergen for a majority of Spanish patients with hazelnut allergy that can cause severe allergic reactions.

Component-resolved diagnosis with recombinant allergens in patients with cherry allergy.

BACKGROUND: In pollen-related food allergy, extracts for skin prick tests (SPTs) are often not standardized, and the test reliability is affected by false-negative reactions. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate a panel of recombinant allergens (RAs) derived from one allergenic food for use in component-resolved in vivo diagnosis, taking cherry as a model food. METHODS: Seventy-nine subjects were included in the study: 24 Swiss patients (group 1) with a positive double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge result to cherries, 23 patients with birch pollen allergy but without cherry allergy (group 2), 23 nonatopic subjects (group 3), and 9 Spanish patients with a history of a cherry allergy (group 4). SPTs were performed in duplicate by using recombinant cherry allergens (Bet v 1-related allergen: recombinant (r) Pru av 1; profilin: rPru av 4; and lipid transfer protein: rPru av 3) in concentrations of 10, 50, and 100 microg/mL. Furthermore, IgE reactivity to rPru av 1, rPru av 4, and rPru av 3 was assessed by means of immunoblot analysis. RESULTS: SPT responses with rPru av 1, rPru av 4, and rPru av 3 were positive in 92%, 17%, and 4% of the patients in group 1; in 74%, 30%, and 0% of the patients in group 2; in 0%, 22%, and 89% of the patients in group 4; and negative for all nonatopic subjects (group 3). Thus the sensitivity of a positive SPT response to at least one of the 3 RAs was 96%. The specificities, negative predictive values, and positive predictive values with the 3 RAs were 100%, 96%, and 100% if calculated in relation to the nonatopic control group but 17%, 79%, and 60% when calculated in relation to the control group with birch pollen allergy. The correlation between SPT and immunoblotting results was excellent. Sensitization to rPru av 3 was associated with more severe symptoms than sensitization to rPru av 1. CONCLUSIONS: SPTs with RAs proved to be highly sensitive for diagnosis of cherry allergy. Component-resolved in vivo diagnosis with standardized amounts of stable RAs allows us to determine sensitization patterns directly, to correlate them with severity of clinical symptoms, and to analyze geographic differences.