Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Musculoskelet Surg ; 106(1): 83-87, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32949004

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Periprosthetic fractures after hip prosthesis represent a constantly increasing clinical problem and a challenging complication to treat surgically. Among these, type B proximal femur fractures should be diagnosed correctly to be treated surgically. The aim of this study was to re-evaluate the type of surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures. METHODS: We examined the cases treated between January 2012 and February 2018, classifying them according to the U.C.S. AO/OTA. We evaluated the radiographic outcome according to the Beals and Tower criteria. Patients still alive were also re-evaluated according to the H.H.S. and the WOMAC score. RESULTS: We treated 48 patients (12 men, 35 women, average age 81 years), divided into 24 type B1, 14 type B2 and 10 type B3 fractures. The overall consolidation rate was 95.4%, while the major complication (implant dislocation, pseudoarthrosis and deep infection) rate was 12.5%. Clinically, it was possible to reassess 34 patients with a mean follow-up of 38.4 months, an average HHS of 75.89 and a mean WOMAC score of 79.93. CONCLUSIONS: Periprosthetic type B fractures are difficult to manage and require careful preoperative planning and appropriate intraoperative management. However, the overall clinical and radiographic result was satisfactory, although patients should still be aware of the risk of complications associated with this type of fracture.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Femoral Fractures , Periprosthetic Fractures , Aged, 80 and over , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Female , Femoral Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Fractures/etiology , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Femur/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Humans , Male , Periprosthetic Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Periprosthetic Fractures/etiology , Periprosthetic Fractures/surgery , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Musculoskelet Surg ; 104(2): 195-200, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31147964

ABSTRACT

Patient-specific instrumentation is a surgical technique that was created to improve the accuracy of implantation, surgical time and workflow in total knee arthroplasty. This study is a single-center, single-surgeon randomized clinical trial. The aim of this work was to evaluate clinical efficacy of PSI versus standard surgical instrumentation in malalignment risk and blood loss reduction. From April 2015 to September 2016, 40 patients for a total of 40 knees were included in the randomization process. Each patient underwent CT scan of the lower limb including hip, knee and ankle joint with the realization of the PSI system and the TKA with Medacta GMK Primary®. Patients were evaluated 1 month after surgery with X-ray and after 2 months with clinical examination and assessment by Knee Society Score (KSS). Blood loss was detected by adding the values calculated in the operative room and the blood loss in the vacuum systems. In the study group, mean value of KSS was 85.2 (IC 95% 81.2-88.5), mean blood loss was 657 ml (IC 95% 580.6-735.4), and mean value of femorotibial angle was 178.8° (IC 95% 178.5-179.3). In the control group, mean value of KSS was 87.2 (IC 95% 85.3-89.4), mean blood loss was 866.5 ml (IC 95% 763.3-972.5), and mean value of femorotibial angle was 178.9°(IC 95% 177.6-180.3). The Student t test detected a significant difference in blood loss between groups (p < 0.05), and no differences were found between KSS. The single-use instrumentation should improve precision, operative time, turnover time, sterilization and maintenance costs and could help to reduce infection risks. Our results confirm only the improvement on reducing blood loss. In our opinion, this technique should be used in selected patients when the surgeon could have some difficulties to perform femoral cuts on coronal plane or when patients need to have a very little blood loss due to other conditions.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/instrumentation , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Bone Malalignment/prevention & control , Patient-Specific Modeling , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Aged , Ankle Joint/diagnostic imaging , Anthropometry , Female , Fiducial Markers , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods
3.
Musculoskelet Surg ; 100(1): 15-8, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26590578

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The tibial plateau fractures involve one of the main weight bearing joints of the human body. The goals of surgical treatment are anatomical reduction, articular surface reconstruction and high primary stability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes after internal plate fixation of this kind of fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2009 to December 2012, we treated 75 cases of tibial plateau fracture with angular stable plates. We used Rasmussen Score and the Knee Society Score for the clinical and functional evaluation. Twenty-five cases that underwent hardware removal had arthroscopic and CT evaluation of the joint. RESULTS: No complications occurred. The clinical and functional evaluation, performed by the KSS and Rasmussen Score, highlighted the high percentage of good-to-excellent results (over 90 %). In every case, the range of motion was good with flexion >90°. Arthroscopy showed the presence of chondral damage in 100 % of patients. In all the cases, we found that X-ray images seem better than the CT images. CONCLUSIONS: Angular stable plates allow to obtain a good primary stability, permitting an early joint recovery with an excellent range of motion. Avoiding to perform a knee arthrotomy at the time of fracture reduction could prove to be an advantage in terms of functional recovery. The meniscus on the injured bone should be preserved in order to maintain good function of the joint. X-ray images remain the gold standard in checking the progression of post-traumatic osteoarthritis.


Subject(s)
Bone Plates , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Middle Aged , Range of Motion, Articular , Tibia , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...