[Integrated multidisciplinary treatment of colorectal neoplasms]. / Trattamento multidisciplinare integrato delle neoplasie colo-rettali.

In this retrospective study, the modality and advantages of the multidisciplinary diagnostic work-up and therapy regarding colorectal neoplasm were analysed. Over the period 2004-2008, 63 patients underwent multidisciplinary treatment for colorectal cancer. All patients underwent surgery (laparoscopic/open). Exeresis was supplemented by adjuvant chemotherapy in those cases beyond IIA stage; all cases of extraperitoneal rectal and anal canal neoplasms plus one case of carcinoma of the transverse colon, initially inoperable, underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy plus chemotherapy. The treatment was initiated approximately 3 weeks after the diagnosis. Fifty-four percent of patients with colonic and upper rectal neoplasms were given adjuvant chemotherapy, starting around 4 weeks after surgery. Exeresis was performed in those patients with extraperitoneal rectal and anal canal neoplasms (12.7%) about 6-8 weeks after they had completed neoadjuvant therapy. At the end of the treatment, 76% of the overall total numbers of patients were in good condition (follow-up 4-50 months). The remaining 24% suffered recurrences about 13 months after the treatment for colonic and upper rectal neoplasm, and 8 1/2 months after treatment for extraperitoneal rectal/anal canal neoplasms. Seventy-five percent of the recurring cases underwent treatment again, with 50% success; the others are still undergoing treatment. The best therapeutic results were obtained by programmed integration of the various diagnostic-therapeutic steps according to an algorithm which we elaborated to evaluate all types of neoplasm at any stage of illness.

[Therapeutic and diagnostic protocol for mild acute biliary pancreatitis: our experience and review of the literature]. / Protocollo diagnostico terapeutico della pancreatite acuta biliare lieve: nostra esperienza e revisione critica della letteratura.

Through a critical review of the literature, the authors analyze and re-assess the current diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms used in the treatment of mild acute biliary pancreatitis, reporting their experience with 27 cases observed in the Policlinico Umberto I Emergency Department (Rome) over the period from March 2003 to May 2005. All patients were treated with the same diagnostic and therapeutic protocol: once the diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis had been made and the severity evaluated, patients presenting clinical or ultrasonographic signs of main biliary duct stones underwent ERCP within 72 hours of onset of symptoms. All patients then underwent a standard-technique laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the same hospital stay, and whenever ERCP had not been performed preoperatively, an intraoperative cholangiography was performed at the time of surgery. No intra- or postoperative complications were observed, with a mean hospital stay of 10.6 days (range: 5-25 days).

[Ergonomic and cosmetic aspects of laparoscopic appendectomy: personal technique]. / Ergonomia ed estetica nell'intervento di appendicectomia laparoscopica: tecnica personale.

We analyzed our case series in order to evaluate the evolution of our laparoscopic technique in ergonomic and cosmetic terms, leading to the right compromise between these aspects. We retrospectively analyzed 136 diagnostic laparoscopies for suspected appendicitis, using scheme A in the first 98 cases (one 10/12-mm umbilical trocar for the optics and two 5-mm operative trocars placed above the pubis on the right and left side) and scheme B in the other 38 cases (one 10/12-mm umbilical trocar for the optics and two 5-mm operative trocars, one placed over the pubis and the other one on the right hip, just on the umbilical line). The diagnosis of appendicitis was confirmed in 117 patients, while other diseases were present in 19 patients. There were no differences between the two groups in mean operative time (45 min), postoperative complications (0.7%) and clinical course (hospital stay: 36 hours on average). We believe that the right compromise between ergonomic and cosmetic considerations is the one shown in scheme B. In this way it is possible to perform all diagnostic and therapeutic manoeuvres such as pulling the appendix out through the umbilical trocar and using suprapubic trocars as an access route for a possible drainage.

[Laparoscopy in abdominal emergencies. Indications and limitations]. / La laparoscopia nelle urgenze addominali. Indicazioni e limiti.

Laparoscopy, which has been well known as a diagnostic procedure for more than a century, has recently established itself as an important therapeutic procedure in several branches of surgery. In the present study the authors report on 221 patients over a 10-year period (1991-2001), admitted to hospital with a diagnosis of acute abdomen or abdominal trauma. All patients were submitted to emergency laparoscopic surgery; 128 patients (57%) presented acute appendicitis, 40 (18%) acute cholecystitis, 13 (6%) occlusive ileus, 10 (5%) adnexal pathologies, 9 (4%) perforation of abdominal viscera, 3 (1.4%) acute diverticulitis, 3 (1.4%) subdiaphragmatic abscesses, 3 (1.4%) intestinal infarction, 2 (0.8%) other diseases and 10 (5%) abdominal trauma. The operation was completed laparoscopically in 192 cases (87%), while conversion to laparotomy proved necessary in 29 cases (13%). The morbidity of the cases completed laparoscopically was 3%, the mortality 0.5%, and the mean hospital stay 4 days. Advantages of laparoscopy (shorter hospital stay, rapid postoperative recovery and faster return to social activities) emerge from the present study and are confirmed by the literature. The possibility of combining a diagnostic procedure with curative therapy suggests that laparoscopy may have an important role in emergency surgery, demonstrating its efficacy also in acute abdominal syndromes. Nevertheless, emergency laparoscopic surgery is still a technically difficult procedure that needs to be performed by an expert surgical team.

["Sequential" treatment: is it the best alternative in cholecysto-choledochal lithiasis?]. / Il trattamento "sequenziale": la migliore delle alternative nella litiasi colecisto-coledocica?

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the treatment of choice for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis. About 10-20% of patients with gallbladder stones may also present associated common bile duct stones. The management of the latter remains controversial because many different surgical strategies are available: laparoscopic treatment (laparoscopic common bile duct exploration), sequential endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/endoscopic sphincterotomy [ERCP/ES] prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy), inverted sequential endoscopic-laparoscopic treatment (laparoscopic cholecystectomy followed by ERCP/ES), and combined endoscopic-laparoscopic treatment (laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative ERCP/ES). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sequential endoscopic-laparoscopic treatment in patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical, biochemical and radiological features of 552 patients operated on for cholelithiasis from 1991 to 2001. Common bile duct stones were suspected on the basis of increased serum levels of bilirubin, GOT, GPT, GGT, alkaline phosphatase; presence of jaundice; history of pancreatitis or cholangitis; dilated common bile duct (diameter > 8 mm) or common bile duct stones at hepatobiliary ultrasonography; presence of common bile duct stones at MR-cholangiography or at i.v. cholangiography. In patients with suspected common bile duct stones, preoperative ERCP was performed; if common bile duct stones were confirmed, ES was performed. When common bile duct stones were not suspected preoperatively, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed directly. Overall morbidity, mortality and conversion rates in the two groups were evaluated. Of 552 patients admitted for cholelithiasis, 62 (11.3%) underwent preoperative ERCP for suspected common bile duct stones. In 41 patients (66.1%) common bile duct stones were identified and ES with common bile duct stone extraction was performed in 40 patients (clearance: 97.5%). The overall morbidity was 16% (10 cases of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis); no mortality occurred. The conversion rate during subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 4.8%. In the group of patients with no suspicion of common bile duct stones, the conversion rate was 4.9%. Sequential treatment cannot be considered the best approach for patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis because of its morbidity rate and the high rate of negative preoperative ERCP findings. Combined endoscopic-laparoscopic treatment seems to present more advantages, especially in term of morbidity, hospital stay and patient compliance and may, in future, be considered the treatment of choice for patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis.