ABSTRACT
AIM: To describe a surgical technique to treat colostomy prolapse as a day case procedure with the patient under sedation and analgesia. METHOD: A 60-mm GIA Universal Stapler is inserted into the lumen of the prolapsed colon at right angles to the contour of the abdominal wall. Several firings are then made to completely divide the prolapsed colon. The instrument is then placed parallel to the skin to remove the prolapsed portion leaving 1-2 cm of bowel above the level of the skin. RESULTS: Two patients underwent the procedure. The operation times were 30 and 13 min. Both took oral liquids 2 h after surgery and solids 2 h later. They were discharged at 24 and 4 h after surgery, respectively. No postoperative pain was reported in either case. At 14 and 6 months of follow-up there has been no recurrence. CONCLUSION: Stapling treatment of prolapsed colostomies has the advantage of being an extra-abdominal procedure. It is performed under sedation and analgesia, the operation time is very short, recovery to normal life is rapid and there is less likelihood of complications by avoiding a laparotomy.
Subject(s)
Colonic Diseases/surgery , Colostomy/adverse effects , Deep Sedation , Surgical Stapling/methods , Analgesia , Humans , Prolapse , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Liver transplantation (OLT) represents the best treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in advanced cirrhosis showing a 70% 5-year survival rate. Our study sought to compare overall survivals among patients who underwent OLT under Milan Criteria (MC) or San Francisco Criteria (UCSFC). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent liver transplantation for HCC in our institution from November 2001 to December 2007. We analyzed age, gender, OLT indication, maximal tumor size, histology, and survival. We compared survival among patients who met MC versus UCSFC. RESULTS: From November 2001 to December 2007, 48/177 (27%) liver transplantations performed in our hospital were indicated due to HCC. The two patients who did not show any tumor in the explanted liver (false-positive ratio 4.2%) were excluded from the analysis. Another two patients were included who showed incidental HCC lesions (false-negative ratio 1.7%), yielding 48 analyzed patients. The mean diameter of the HCC nodules were 3.1 cm before OLT and 3.8 cm in the pathologic examination, a statistically significant difference. Two patients exceeded MC before OLT, and six patients showed this feature in the explanted liver. There was a significant difference in the degree of vascular invasion between the two groups. Overall mortality was 25.9% at 4 years; the MC group show an 11.9% versus UCSFC group, a 66.6% rate. CONCLUSIONS: HCC is a common indication for OLT. Hepatitis C virus is the most common etiology. Survival among the MC group was significantly better than that of subjects beyond the MC, a difference that supports the use of MC for HCC.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Liver Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Patient Selection , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/complications , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Italy , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/complications , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Male , Retrospective Studies , San Francisco , Survival Analysis , Survivors , Time FactorsSubject(s)
Liver Transplantation/physiology , Liver Transplantation/rehabilitation , Adult , Blood Pressure , Creatinine/blood , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Employment , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hypercholesterolemia/epidemiology , Hypertriglyceridemia/epidemiology , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Readmission , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Reoperation , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia has been described mainly in the dermis and subcutaneous tissues of the head and neck, and only occasionally in the oral cavity. A case of angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia of the tongue in an 82-year-old man with typical morphologic features is presented. The diagnosis criteria and treatment of this lesion reported in the English literature are also reviewed.
