Improving the antitumor activity of R-CHOP with NGR-hTNF in primary CNS lymphoma: final results of a phase 2 trial.

Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is the standard treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Primary DLBCL of the central nervous system (CNS) (primary central nervous system lymphoma [PCNSL]) is an exception because of the low CNS bioavailability of related drugs. NGR-human tumor necrosis factor (NGR-hTNF) targets CD13+ vessels, enhances vascular permeability and CNS access of anticancer drugs, and provides the rationale for the treatment of PCNSL with R-CHOP. Herein, we report activity and safety of R-CHOP preceded by NGR-hTNF in patients with PCNSL relapsed/refractory to high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy enrolled in a phase 2 trial. Overall response rate (ORR) was the primary endpoint. A sample size of 28 patients was considered necessary to demonstrate improvement from 30% to 50% ORR. NGR-hTNF/R-CHOP would be declared active if ≥12 responses were recorded. Treatment was well tolerated; there were no cases of unexpected toxicities, dose reductions or interruptions. NGR-hTNF/R-CHOP was active, with confirmed tumor response in 21 patients (75%; 95% confidence interval, 59%-91%), which was complete in 11. Seventeen of the 21 patients with response to treatment received consolidation (ASCT, WBRT, and/or lenalidomide maintenance). At a median follow-up of 21 (range, 14-31) months, 5 patients remained relapse-free and 6 were alive. The activity of NGR-hTNF/R-CHOP is in line with the expression of CD13 in both pericytes and endothelial cells of tumor vessels. High plasma levels of chromogranin A, an NGR-hTNF inhibitor, were associated with proton pump inhibitor use and a lower remission rate, suggesting that these drugs should be avoided during TNF-based therapy. Further research on this innovative approach to CNS lymphomas is warranted. The trial was registered as EudraCT: 2014-001532-11.

R-CHOP preceded by blood-brain barrier permeabilization with engineered tumor necrosis factor-α in primary CNS lymphoma.

Patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) are treated with high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy, which requires hospitalization and extensive expertise to manage related toxicity. The use of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) could overcome these difficulties, but blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration of related drugs is poor. Tumor necrosis factor-α coupled with NGR (NGR-hTNF), a peptide targeting CD13+ vessels, induces endothelial permeabilization and improves tumor access of cytostatics. We tested the hypothesis that NGR-hTNF can break the BBB, thereby improving penetration and activity of R-CHOP in patients with relapsed/refractory PCNSL (NCT03536039). Patients received six R-CHOP21 courses, alone at the first course and preceded by NGR-hTNF (0.8 µg/m2) afterward. This trial included 2 phases: an "explorative phase" addressing the effect of NGR-hTNF on drug pharmacokinetic parameters and on vessel permeability, assessed by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and 99mTc-diethylene-triamine-pentacetic acid-single-photon emission computed tomography, and the expression of CD13 on tumor tissue; and an "expansion phase" with overall response rate as the primary end point, in which the 2-stage Simon Minimax design was used. At the first stage, if ≥4 responses were observed among 12 patients, the study accrual would have continued (sample size, 28). Herein, we report results of the explorative phase and the first-stage analysis (n = 12). CD13 was expressed in tumor vessels of all cases. NGR-hTNF selectively increased vascular permeability in tumoral/peritumoral areas, without interfering with drug plasma/cerebrospinal fluid concentrations. The NGR-hTNF/R-CHOP combination was well tolerated: there were only 2 serious adverse events, and grade 4 toxicity was almost exclusively hematological, which were resolved without dose reductions or interruptions. NGR-hTNF/R-CHOP was active, with 9 confirmed responses (75%; 95% confidence interval, 51-99), 8 of which were complete. In conclusion, NGR-hTNF/R-CHOP was safe in these heavily pretreated patients. NGR-hTNF enhanced vascular permeability specifically in tumoral/peritumoral areas, which resulted in fast and sustained responses.

Challenges and prospects in the diagnosis and treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma.

Introduction: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) retains peculiar biological and clinical characteristics and a worse prognosis with respect to other comparable lymphomas. The need for high doses of chemotherapy to achieve valid drug concentrations in cerebral tissues and/or radiotherapy results in severe treatment-related toxicities, mainly neurologic, which are frequently as disabling as the disease itself.Areas covered: Several emerging combined therapies are addressed that focus on treating PCNSL. The prognosis has improved in the last years but several questions remain unanswered and the research of more effective therapies goes on. Information and data were obtained from direct authors' experience and a PubMed search of recent peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, and clinical guidelines.Expert commentary: The substantial progress observed in PCNSL has to be ascribed to a carefully combination of standard chemotherapeutic drugs. High-dose methotrexate-based polychemotherapy followed by mainteinance therapy offers one of the best chances to control the disease. Major issues that deserve many efforts by researchers are the definition of optimal consolidation treatment and a shared management of specific conditions such as elderly population and intra-ocular localization.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma.

Primary CNS lymphomas (PCNSL) represent a subgroup of malignancies with specific characteristics, aggressive course, and unsatisfactory outcome in contrast with other lymphomas comparable for tumour burden and/or histological type. Despite a high chemo- and radiosensitivity, remissions are frequently shortlasting, mainly because the blood brain-barrier limits the access of many drugs to the CNS. Moreover, survivor patients are at high risk of developing severe treatment-related toxicity, mainly disabling neurotoxicity, raising the question of how to balance therapy intensification with side-effects control. Although the prognosis remains poor, it has significantly improved over the past two decades as a result of better treatment strategies with a curative aim. Surgery has no impact on survival, and is reserved to diagnosis by stereotactic biopsy. Actual front-line therapy consists of high-dose methotrexate-based poly-chemotherapy. The optimal drugs combination has not yet been identified even if there is a suggestion for a synergistic role for the adjunction of cytarabine, thiotepa, and rituximab. Radiotherapy retains an important role as salvage therapy in refractory/relapsing patients, while its use is more debated in the setting of response consolidation in patients who achieve a complete remission after induction chemotherapy. High-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem-cell transplantation is increasingly used as an effective method aimed to control microscopic disease, and the pros and contras of this approach are outlined.

Present and future treatment options for primary CNS lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Primary Central Nervous System (CNS) lymphomas are a rare group of malignancies with peculiar clinical and biologic features, aggressive course, and unsatisfactory outcome in contrast with other aggressive lymphomas. Despite a high chemo- and radiosensitivity, remissions are frequently short lasting, mainly because the blood-brain barrier limits the access of many drugs to the CNS, preventing a homogeneous treatment of all CNS tissues. Moreover, survivor patients are at high risk of developing severe treatment-related toxicity, mainly disabling neurotoxicity for elderly ones, raising the question of whether to intensify therapy to improve the cure rate or to downgrade treatment to reduce side effects. Although prognosis remains poor, it has significantly improved over the past two decades as a result of better treatment strategies with a curative aim. AREAS COVERED: The purpose of this review is to focus on either the actual pharmaco-therapeutic knowledge or the predictable future developments for the immunocompetent population (the vast majority of patients today). The most important published reports on these fields are presented. EXPERT OPINION: Actual front-line therapy consists of high-dose-methotrexate-based polichemotherapy, mostly in combination with high-dose cytarabine and/or alkylating agents. The use of high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem-cell transplantation is increased; with some pros and cons, this strategy appears in controlling microscopic disease. Management of intraocular and meningeal lymphomas is controversial considering their peculiar characteristics that need to be specifically addressed. Finally, management of elderly patients and of relapsed disease is addressed.

High Doses of Antimetabolites Followed by High-Dose Sequential Chemoimmunotherapy and Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Patients With Systemic B-Cell Lymphoma and Secondary CNS Involvement: Final Results of a Multicenter Phase II Trial.

PURPOSE: Treatment of secondary CNS dissemination in patients with aggressive lymphomas remains an important, unmet clinical need. Herein, we report the final results of a multicenter phase II trial addressing a new treatment for secondary CNS lymphoma based on encouraging experiences with high doses of antimetabolites in primary CNS lymphoma and with rituximab plus high-dose sequential chemoimmunotherapy (R-HDS) in relapsed aggressive lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HIV-negative patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and secondary CNS involvement at diagnosis or relapse, age 18 to 70 years, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 3 were enrolled and treated with high-doses of methotrexate and cytarabine, followed by R-HDS (cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, and etoposide) supported by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). Treatment included eight doses of rituximab and four doses of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine. The primary end point was 2-year event-free survival; the planned accrual was 38 patients. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled; CNS disease was detected at presentation in 16 patients. Toxicity was usually hematologic and manageable, with grade 4 febrile neutropenia in 3% of delivered courses and grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity in 2% of delivered courses. Four patients died because of toxicity. Autologous stem cells were successfully collected in 24 (89%) of 27 patients (median, 10 × 10(6)/kg); 20 patients underwent ASCT. Complete response was achieved in 24 patients (complete response rate, 63%; 95% CI, 48% to 78%). At a median follow-up of 48 months, 17 patients remained relapse free, with a 2-year event-free survival rate of 50% ± 8%. At 5 years, 16 patients were alive, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 41% ± 8% for the whole series and 68% ± 11% for patients who received transplantation. Systemic (extra-CNS) and/or meningeal disease did not affect outcome. CONCLUSION: The combination of high doses of antimetabolites, R-HDS, and ASCT is feasible and effective in patients age 18 to 70 years old with secondary CNS lymphoma, and we propose it as a new standard therapeutic option.

Risk-tailored CNS prophylaxis in a mono-institutional series of 200 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated in the rituximab era.

The most effective strategy to prevent central nervous system (CNS) dissemination in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains an important, unmet clinical need. Herein, we report a retrospective analysis of risk-tailored CNS prophylaxis in 200 human immunodeficiency virus-negative adults with DLBCL treated with rituximab-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) or similar. High risk of CNS relapse was defined by involvement of specific extranodal organs, or simultaneous presence of advanced stage and high serum lactate dehydrogenase level; CNS prophylaxis with high-dose methotrexate ± intrathecal chemotherapy (IT) was routinely used in high-risk patients diagnosed after 2007. CNS relapse risk was low in 93 patients and high in 107; 40 high-risk patients received prophylaxis, which consisted of IT alone in 7. At a median follow-up of 60 months, one low-risk and nine high-risk patients (1% vs. 8%; P = 0·01) experienced CNS relapse. In the high-risk group, CNS relapses occurred in 8/67 (12%) patients who did not receive prophylaxis and in 1/40 (2·5%) patients who did; the latter occurred in a patient managed with IT alone. CNS relapse rate was 12% (9/74) for patients treated with "inadequate" prophylaxis (none or IT only) and 0% (0/33) for patients managed with intravenous prophylaxis (P = 0·03). In conclusion, high-dose methotrexate-based prophylaxis significantly reduces CNS failures in high-risk patients stratified by involvement of specific extranodal sites and International Prognostic Index.

Current uses of radiation therapy in patients with primary CNS lymphoma.

High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based chemotherapy is the current first-line therapy for primary CNS lymphoma. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plays an important role in the management of primary CNS lymphoma and is indicated in patients with contraindication to chemotherapy, in patients with unusual histologic subtypes as curative treatment, as complementary therapy for patients failing to achieve complete remission after systemic chemotherapy and as salvage therapy for refractory or relapsing patients when systemic chemotherapy is no longer advisable. The two major pitfalls in WBRT use are transitory efficacy and neurotoxicity with deterioration of quality of life. Accordingly, WBRT administration as consolidation therapy in complete remission patients after first-line chemotherapy is controversial. In the present review, indications of WBRT will be outlined with emphasis on consolidation therapy, treatment-related neurotoxicity and efforts aimed at reducing toxicity.

[The primary mediastinal lymphoma: state of the art and therapeutical perspectives]. / Il linfoma primitivo del mediastino: stato dell'arte e prospettive terapeutiche.

Within diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, the Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma has to be considered as a separate and well-defined clinico-pathological entity. Its tendency to target young adults makes its social impact particularly significant; hence, the General Practitioner carries the responsibility for an early diagnosis. On the contrary, the extreme complexity of the available therapies makes a quick referral to specialized Clinical Centres of outmost importance, since this remains the best way to enrol as many patients as possible in therapeutic protocols. Nowadays, good clinical results and a favourable outcome are achievable, but some questions remain open. The role of radiotherapy still has to be clarified, both as a complete remission consolidation, as well as a treatment of the residual disease. Conversely, a golden standard for the second line treatment has not been clearly established.

Phase I study of NGR-hTNF, a selective vascular targeting agent, in combination with cisplatin in refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: NGR-hTNF exploits the tumor-homing peptide asparagine-glycine-arginine (NGR) for selectively targeting TNF-α to an aminopeptidase N overexpressed on cancer endothelial cells. Preclinical synergism with cisplatin was displayed even at low doses. This study primarily aimed to explore the safety of low-dose NGR-hTNF combined with cisplatin in resistant/refractory malignancies. Secondary aims included pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics, and activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: NGR-hTNF was escalated using a doubling-dose scheme (0.2-0.4-0.8-1.6 µg/m(2)) in combination with fixed-dose of cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)), both given intravenously once every three weeks. PKs and circulating TNF-receptors (sTNF-Rs) were assessed over the first three cycles. RESULTS: Globally, 22 patients (12 pretreated with platinum) received a range of one to ten cycles. Consistently with the low-dose range tested, maximum-tolerated dose was not reached. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed at 0.2 (n = 4) and 0.4 µg/m(2) (n = 3). One DLT (grade 3 infusion-related reaction) was observed at 0.8 µg/m(2). This dose cohort was expanded to six patients without further DLTs. No DLTs were noted also at 1.6 µg/m(2) (n = 3). NGR-hTNF exposure increased dose-proportionally without apparent PK interactions with cisplatin. No shedding of sTNF-Rs was detected up to 0.8 µg/m(2). At the dose level of 0.8 µg/m(2), expanded to 12 patients for activity assessment, a platinum-pretreated lung cancer patient achieved a partial response lasting more than six months and five patients maintained stable disease for a median time of 5.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of NGR-hTNF 0.8 µg/m(2) with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) showed favorable toxicity profile and promising antitumor activity.

Phase II study of NGR-hTNF, a selective vascular targeting agent, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of standard therapy.

BACKGROUND: NGR-hTNF consists of human tumour necrosis factor (hTNF) fused with the tumour-homing peptide Asp-Gly-Arg (NGR), which is able to selectively bind an aminopeptidase N overexpressed on tumour blood vessels. Preclinical antitumour activity was observed even at low doses. We evaluated the activity and safety of low-dose NGR-hTNF in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients failing standard therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with progressive disease at study entry received NGR-hTNF 0.8 µg/m(2) given intravenously every 3 weeks. The median number of prior treatment regimens was three (range, 2-5). One-quarter of patients had previously received four or more regimens and two-thirds targeted agents. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary study objective. RESULTS: NGR-hTNF was well tolerated. No treatment-related grade 3 to 4 toxicities were detected, most common grade 1 to 2 adverse events being short-lived, infusion-time related chills (50.0%). One partial response and 12 stable diseases were observed, yielding a disease control rate of 39.4% (95% CI, 22.9-57.8%). Median PFS and overall survival were 2.5 months (95% CI, 2.1-2.8) and 13.1 months (95% CI, 8.9-17.3), respectively; whereas in patients who achieved disease control the median PFS and overall survival were 3.8 and 15.4 months, respectively. In an additional cohort of 13 patients treated at same dose with a weekly schedule, there was no increased toxicity and 2 patients experienced PFS longer than 10 months. CONCLUSION: Based on tolerability and preliminary evidence of disease control in heavily pretreated CRC patients, NGR-hTNF deserves further evaluation in combination with standard chemotherapy.

Phase II study of asparagine-glycine-arginine-human tumor necrosis factor alpha, a selective vascular targeting agent, in previously treated patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

PURPOSE: NGR-hTNF consists of human tumor necrosis factor alpha (hTNF-alpha) fused to the tumor-homing peptide asparagine-glycine-arginine (NGR) able to selectively bind an aminopeptidase N isoform overexpressed on tumor blood vessels. Hypervascularity is a prominent and poor-prognosis feature of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Currently, there are no standard options for patients with MPM who are failing a front-line pemetrexed-based regimen. We explored safety and efficacy of NGR-hTNF in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had radiologically documented tumor progression and performance status < or = 2. Primary study aim was progression-free survival (PFS). NGR-hTNF 0.8 microg/m(2) was given intravenously every 3 weeks. A subsequent cohort of patients received 0.8 microg/m(2) on a weekly basis. RESULTS: In the triweekly cohort (n = 43), only one grade 3 drug-related toxicity was noted, and the most common grades 1 to 2 were short-lived chills (71%). The median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.3 to 3.3 months). Nineteen patients (44%) had disease control (one had partial response, and 18 had stable diseases) and experienced a median progression-free time of 4.4 months. In the weekly cohort (n = 14), there was no higher toxicity, and median PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 4.1 months). Seven patients (50%) had disease control (all stable diseases) and had a median progression-free interval of 9.1 months. In the overall study population (N = 57), median PFS was 2.8 months. Median progression-free time was 4.7 months in twenty-six patients (46%) who achieved disease control. Median survival was 12.1 months. CONCLUSION: The tolerability and disease control of NGR-hTNF 0.8 microg/m(2) weekly warrant additional evaluation in patients with advanced MPM.

Defining the optimal biological dose of NGR-hTNF, a selective vascular targeting agent, in advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: NGR-hTNF consists of human tumour necrosis factor-alpha (hTNF-alpha) fused to the tumour-homing peptide NGR, a ligand of an aminopeptidase N/CD13 isoform, which is overexpressed on endothelial cells of newly formed tumour blood vessels. NGR-TNF showed a biphasic dose-response curve in preclinical models. This study exploring the low-dose range aimed to define safety and optimal biological dose of NGR-hTNF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pharmacokinetics, plasma biomarkers and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) were evaluated at baseline and after each cycle in 16 patients enrolled at four doubling-dose levels (0.2-0.4-0.8-1.6 microg/m(2)). NGR-hTNF was given intravenously as 1-h infusion every 3 weeks (q3w). Tumour response was assessed q6w. RESULTS: Eighty-three cycles (median, 2; range, 1-29) were administered. Most frequent treatment-related toxicity was grade 1-2 chills (69%), occurring during the first infusions. Only one patient treated at 1.6 microg/m(2) had a grade 3 drug-related toxicity (chills and dyspnoea). Both C(max) and AUC increased proportionally with dose. No shedding of soluble TNF-alpha receptors was observed up to 0.8 microg/m(2). Seventy-five percent of DCE-MRI assessed patients showed a decrease over time of K(trans), which was more pronounced at 0.8 microg/m(2). Seven patients (44%) had stable disease for a median time of 5.9 months, including a colon cancer patient who experienced an 18-month progression-free time. CONCLUSION: Based on tolerability, soluble TNF-receptors kinetics, anti-vascular effect and disease control, NGR-hTNF 0.8 microg/m(2) will be further developed either as single-agent or with standard chemotherapy.