ABSTRACT
Intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm (IOPN) of the pancreas is a recently recognized pancreatic tumor. Here, we aimed to determine the most essential features with the systematic review tool. PubMed, SCOPUS, and Embase were searched for studies reporting data on pancreatic IOPN. The clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular data were extracted and summarized. Then, a comparative analysis of the molecular alterations of IOPN with those of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm from reference cohorts (including The Cancer Genome Atlas) was conducted. The key findings from 414 IOPNs were as follows: 1) Clinicopathological Features: Male-to-female ratio was 1,5:1. Pancreatic head was the most common site (131/237, 55.3%), but a diffuse tumor extension involving more than one pancreatic segment was described in about 1/5 of cases (49/237, 20.6%). The mean size was 45.5 mm. An associated invasive carcinoma was present in 50% of cases (168/336). In those cases, most tumors were pT1/pT2 and pN0 (>80%), and vascular invasion was uncommon (20.6%). Regarding survival, more than 90% of patients were alive after surgical resection. 2) Immunohistochemical and Molecular Features: The most expressed mucins were MUC5AC (110/112, 98.2%) and MUC6 (78/84, 92.8%). Compared with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, the classic pancreatic drivers KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4, and GNAS were less altered in IOPN (p<0.01). Moreover, fusions involving PRKACA or PRKACB genes were detected in all of 68 cases examined, with PRKACB::ATP1B1 as the most common (27/68 cases, 39.7%). These genomic events emerged as an entity-defining molecular alteration of IOPN (p<0.01). Thus, such fusions represent a promising biomarker for diagnostic purposes. Recent evidence also suggests their role in influencing the acquisition of oncocytic morphology. IOPN is a distinct pancreatic neoplasm with specific clinicopathological and molecular features. Considering the clinical/prognostic implications, its recognition is essential for pathologists and, ultimately, patients' management.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: A marked histomolecular heterogeneity characterizes pancreatic cancer. Thus, different tumor histologies with divergent genomic profiles exist within the same category. AREAS COVERED: Using data from PubMed, SCOPUS, and Embase (last search date: 04/04/2024), this expert-based, narrative review presents and discusses the essential molecular determinants of biological aggressiveness and poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer. First, KRAS mutation still represents one of the most critical difficulties in treating pancreatic cancers. In this district, it is mutated in > 90% of malignant tumors. Notably, actionable alterations for molecular-based therapies are typically lacking in KRAS-mutated pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, transcriptome-based studies clarified that the squamous phenotype is characterized by poorer prognosis and response to standard chemotherapy. We also discuss molecular biomarkers related to dismal prognosis in specific subsets of pancreatic cancer, such as SMAD4 in signet-ring cell carcinoma and TP53 in invasive cancers derived from intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms. EXPERT OPINION: The identification of the subgroups of pancreatic cancer with particularly unfavorable prognoses is a critical step for addressing specific research efforts. In addition to implementing and strengthening current precision oncology strategies, the decisive step for improving the survival of patients affected by pancreatic cancer must pass through targeting the KRAS gene.
