Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Surg ; 12(12): 1324-7, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25448653

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To investigate the prognostic significance of the number of lymph nodes removed in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with no metastatic lymph node. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clinicopathological data of 461 CRC patients was analyzed. In order to compare the survival of patients who had fewer lymph nodes removed versus the survival of patients who had 1-3 metastatic lymph node(s), a separate group of 74 N1 disease patients were also included in the study. All patient data were collected prospectively. Kaplan-Meier method was used for calculation and plotting of the survival curves of the patient groups, and log-rank test was used for the comparison of the survival curves. RESULTS: Cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates of patients who had 1-7 lymph node(s) and 8-11 lymph nodes removed were significantly worse than those who had 12 or more lymph nodes removed (p = 0.006 and p = 0.037, respectively), while CSS was not significantly different between those who had 1-7 versus 8-11 lymph node(s) removed (p = 0.647); this grouping had independent prognostic significance in Cox analysis (p = 0.006). CSS of patients with N1 disease was not significantly different from those who had 1-7 and 8-11 lymph node(s) removed (p = 0.312 and p = 0.165, respectively), while it was significantly worse than CSS of patients who had 12 or more lymph nodes removed (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In colorectal cancer patients whose removed lymph nodes are non-metastatic, removal of at least 12 lymph nodes will determine the lymph node status reliably.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Lymph Node Excision/mortality , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Lymph Node Excision/statistics & numerical data , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Survival Rate
2.
Int J Surg ; 12(7): 737-41, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24802519

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To compare the patients with primary colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and non-resectable distant metastases with or without primary colorectal tumor resection as a primary treatment in terms of postoperative mortality and overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clinicopathological data of 188 CRC patients with non-resectable distant metastases was analyzed. All patient data were collected prospectively. Colorectal tumor was resected in 121 patients (64.3%). Kaplan-Meier method was used for calculation and plotting of the OS curves of the patient groups, and log-rank test was used for the comparison of the survival curves. The relative importance of the prognostic features was investigated using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In the whole series and in the patient group undergoing emergency surgical intervention, mortality rate was lower in patients having colorectal tumor resection compared with non-resected patients, with differences approaching the significance level (p = 0.072 and p = 0.076, respectively). Median OS time was significantly longer in resection group (11.0 months), compared with non-resection group (5.5 months) (p < 0.001); in the multivariate Cox analysis colorectal tumor resection had independent prognostic significance (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Resection of colorectal tumor in primary CRC patients with non-resectable distant metastasis gives significant survival advantage without increasing postoperative mortality compared with non-resection.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colectomy/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/secondary , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...