Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 73(2): 377-84; discussion 384, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22846943

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons has defined six minimum activation criteria (ACS-6) for the highest level of trauma activations at trauma centers. The verification criteria also allow for the inclusion of additional criteria at the institution's discretion. The purpose of this prospective multicenter study was to evaluate the ACS-6 as well as commonly used activation criteria to evaluate overtriage and undertriage rates for pediatric trauma team activation. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected at nine pediatric trauma centers to examine 29 commonly used activation criteria. Patients meeting any of these criteria were evaluated for the use of high-level trauma resuscitation resources according to an expert consensus list. Patients requiring a resource but not meeting any activation criteria were included to evaluate undertriage rates. RESULTS: During the 1-year study, a total of 656 patients were enrolled with a mean age of 8 years, a median Injury Severity Score of 14, and mortality of 11%. Using all criteria, 55% of patients would have been overtriaged and 9% would have been undertriaged. If only the ACS-6 were used, 24% of patients would have been overtriaged and 16% would have been undertriaged. Among activation criteria with more than 10 patients, those most predictive of using a high-level resource were a gunshot wound to the abdomen (92%), blood given before arrival (83%), traumatic arrest (83%), tachycardia/poor perfusion (83%), and age-appropriate hypotension (77%). The addition of tachycardia/poor perfusion and pretrauma center resuscitation with greater than 40 mL/kg results in eight criteria with an overtriage of 39% and an undertriage of 10.5%. CONCLUSION: The ACS-6 provides a reliable overtriage or undertriage rate for pediatric patients. The inclusion of two additional criteria can further improve these rates while maintianing a simplified triage list for children.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Trauma Centers/organization & administration , Triage/standards , Wounds and Injuries/classification , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Prospective Studies , Qualitative Research , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity , Societies, Medical , Survival Analysis , Triage/methods , Wounds and Injuries/diagnosis , Wounds and Injuries/mortality
2.
J Pediatr Surg ; 43(12): 2268-72, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19040950

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Community hospitals commonly obtain computed tomographic (CT) imaging of pediatric trauma patients before triaging to a level I pediatric trauma center (PTC). This practice potentially increases radiation exposure when imaging must be duplicated after transfer. METHODS: A retrospective review of our level 1 PTC registry from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2006, was conducted. Level I and II trauma patients were grouped based on whether they had undergone outside CT examination (head and/or abdomen) at a referring hospital (group 1) or received initial CT examination at our institution (group 2). Subgroups were analyzed based on whether duplicate CT examination was required at our PTC (Fischer's Exact test). RESULTS: A duplicate CT scan (within 4 hours of transfer) was required in 91% (30/33) of group 1 transfer patients, whereas no group 2 patient required a duplicate scan (0/55; P < .0001). There was no significant difference within the groups for weight, age, or intensive care unit length of stay. CONCLUSION: A significant number of pediatric trauma patients who receive CT scans at referring hospitals before transfer to our level I PTC require duplicate scans of the same anatomical field(s) after transfer, exposing them to increase potential clinical risk and cost.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Craniocerebral Trauma/diagnostic imaging , Hospitals, Community , Hospitals, Pediatric , Patient Transfer , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Trauma Centers , Unnecessary Procedures , Abdominal Injuries/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Compact Disks , Craniocerebral Trauma/epidemiology , Equipment Failure , Female , Forms and Records Control , Glasgow Coma Scale , Hospitals, Community/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Pediatric/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric/statistics & numerical data , Male , Radiation Dosage , Radiology Information Systems , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Trauma Severity Indices
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...