Ellagic Acid and Cancer Hallmarks: Insights from Experimental Evidence.

Cancer is a complex and multifaceted disease with a high global incidence and mortality rate. Although cancer therapy has evolved significantly over the years, numerous challenges persist on the path to effectively combating this multifaceted disease. Natural compounds derived from plants, fungi, or marine organisms have garnered considerable attention as potential therapeutic agents in the field of cancer research. Ellagic acid (EA), a natural polyphenolic compound found in various fruits and nuts, has emerged as a potential cancer prevention and treatment agent. This review summarizes the experimental evidence supporting the role of EA in targeting key hallmarks of cancer, including proliferation, angiogenesis, apoptosis evasion, immune evasion, inflammation, genomic instability, and more. We discuss the molecular mechanisms by which EA modulates signaling pathways and molecular targets involved in these cancer hallmarks, based on in vitro and in vivo studies. The multifaceted actions of EA make it a promising candidate for cancer prevention and therapy. Understanding its impact on cancer biology can pave the way for developing novel strategies to combat this complex disease.

Chalcones and Gastrointestinal Cancers: Experimental Evidence.

Colorectal (CRC) and gastric cancers (GC) are the most common digestive tract cancers with a high incidence rate worldwide. The current treatment including surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy has several limitations such as drug toxicity, cancer recurrence or drug resistance and thus it is a great challenge to discover an effective and safe therapy for CRC and GC. In the last decade, numerous phytochemicals and their synthetic analogs have attracted attention due to their anticancer effect and low organ toxicity. Chalcones, plant-derived polyphenols, received marked attention due to their biological activities as well as for relatively easy structural manipulation and synthesis of new chalcone derivatives. In this study, we discuss the mechanisms by which chalcones in both in vitro and in vivo conditions suppress cancer cell proliferation or cancer formation.

The Role of Silver Nanoparticles in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer: Are There Any Perspectives for the Future?

Cancer is a fatal disease with a complex pathophysiology. Lack of specificity and cytotoxicity, as well as the multidrug resistance of traditional cancer chemotherapy, are the most common limitations that often cause treatment failure. Thus, in recent years, significant efforts have concentrated on the development of a modernistic field called nano-oncology, which provides the possibility of using nanoparticles (NPs) with the aim to detect, target, and treat cancer diseases. In comparison with conventional anticancer strategies, NPs provide a targeted approach, preventing undesirable side effects. What is more, nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems have shown good pharmacokinetics and precise targeting, as well as reduced multidrug resistance. It has been documented that, in cancer cells, NPs promote reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, activate ER (endoplasmic reticulum) stress, modulate various signaling pathways, etc. Furthermore, their ability to inhibit tumor growth in vivo has also been documented. In this paper, we have reviewed the role of silver NPs (AgNPs) in cancer nanomedicine, discussing numerous mechanisms by which they render anticancer properties under both in vitro and in vivo conditions, as well as their potential in the diagnosis of cancer.

Evaluation of 5-HTTLPR (insertion/deletion) and BDNF (rs6265) genetic variations in the Slovakian individuals suffering from affective disorders.

The pathophysiology of affective disorders (AD), including depressive disorders (DD) and anxiety disorders (ANXD), is still unclear. To understand risk factors of the disorders, we evaluated genetic variations of the serotonin reuptake transporter (5-HTTLPR, ins/del) and the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF, rs6265) in Slovak patients suffering from AD. After genotyping we observed a significantly increased frequency of LS and LL genotypes (5-HTTLPR) in individuals diagnosed with AD compared to controls (OR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.21-3.27, p = 0.006). There was also a significant relationship between TT (BDNF) genotype and the risk of AD in males (OR = 5.93, 95% CI = 1.42-27.07, p = 0.011). In gene-gene analysis, the LL or LS (5-HTTLPR) and CT or TT (BDNF) genotype combinations had a risk-enhancing effect on AD susceptibility (mainly ANXD in males), while SS (5-HTTLPR) and TT (BDNF) combination had a protective effect on AD risk (mainly ANXD). However, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.

New Chalcone Derivative Inhibits ABCB1 in Multidrug Resistant T-cell Lymphoma and Colon Adenocarcinoma Cells.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Development of new potential drugs to overcome multidrug resistance to chemotherapy is a big challenge for cancer treatment. Attention is also given to the natural compounds and their derivatives. The study aimed at evaluating the impact of a new chalcone derivative (1C) on multidrug resistant cell lines, focusing on P-glycoprotein (P-gp, ABCB1) inhibition, as well as 1C-doxorubicin interaction in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cytotoxic and antiproliferative effects of the 1C compound were assessed by thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) method in mouse T-cell lymphoma and human colon adenocarcinoma cells expressing ABCB1. Alterations in ABCB1 activity were evaluated by rhodamine 123 accumulation assay using flow cytometry. Drug-drug interaction was studied using combination assay. RESULTS: Our results confirmed antiproliferative, cytotoxic, as well as ABCB1 inhibitory potential of 1C in both tested ABCB1-expressing cancer cell lines. Furthermore, 1C displayed synergistic interaction with doxorubicin. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest the 1C chalcone derivative as a promising compound against resistant lymphoma and colon cancer, which could be used in monotherapy or in combination with other chemotherapeutics.

Does G2677T Polymorphism of the MDR1 Gene Make a Difference in the Therapeutic Response to Paroxetine in Depressed Patients in a Slovakian Population?

BACKGROUND The role of multidrug resistance 1 gene (MDR1 or ABCB1) polymorphism G2677T was studied in relation to paroxetine therapeutic efficacy and its side effects, as well as its association with selected demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with depressive disorder. MATERIAL AND METHODS To evaluate therapeutic efficacy, all patients (n=61) were rated at week 0, 2, 4, and 6 using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-21). They were labelled as "responders" (a decrease in HAMD ≥50%) and "nonresponders". The frequency of the side effects of nausea and sexual dysfunction were assessed using the Utvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser rating scale. The PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism method was used for genotyping. RESULTS A significantly enhanced therapeutic efficacy of paroxetine was observed in patients carrying at least one T allele at week 4 (GG versus GT: 0.049; GG versus GT+TT: 0.035) and week 6 (GG versus TT: 0.001; GG versus GT+TT: 0.016; GG+GT versus TT: 0.003; G versus T: 0.001). On the other hand, carriers of the T allele showed only a nonsignificant increase in HAMD-21 score reduction. In the present study, no significant association between G2677T polymorphism and side effects was detected. However, we found a marginally significant difference between GG and GT genotypes regarding family history of depressive disorder (p=0.049). CONCLUSIONS Our study provided evidence for the potential effect of MDR1 G2677T polymorphism on paroxetine therapeutic efficacy, and eventually on depressive disorder family history. Larger multicenter studies and studies across other ethnic groups are needed to elucidate the contradictory implications of G2677T polymorphism with depressive disorder and its treatment.

The Efficacy and Toxicity of Using the Lingzhi or Reishi Medicinal Mushroom, Ganoderma lucidum (Agaricomycetes), and Its Products in Chemotherapy (Review).

Around the world, cancer patients often combine conventional anticancer treatment with complementary alternative medicines derived from natural sources such as fungi and mushrooms, including the popular lingzhi or reishi medicinal mushroom Ganoderma lucidum. Many studies to date have described the anticancer properties of G. lucidum, which are attributed to its major pharmacologically bioactive compounds, such as terpenoids and polysaccharides. Moreover, several scientific observations have suggested a potential beneficial therapeutic strategy using G. lucidum in combination with chemotherapeutic agents to improve therapeutic outcome. However, to my knowledge, no systematic review has been conducted in this area. Therefore, this review summarizes the current knowledge on G. lucidum or its individual components in relation to chemotherapeutic efficacy, ability to reverse multidrug resistance, and chemotherapeutic toxicity.

MDR1 polymorphisms and idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in Slovak children: preliminary results.

BACKGROUND: The role of the multidrug resistance-1 (MDR1 or ABCB1) gene polymorphisms 1236T>C, 2677T>G, and 3435T>C was studied in relation to susceptibility, demographics, and pathological characteristics, as well as their role in the therapeutic response (TR) to prednisone treatment in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS). MATERIAL/METHODS: The polymorphisms were analyzed using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method in 46 children with INS and in 100 healthy controls. Different genetic models (codominant, dominant, recessive, and overdominant) were used for testing of associations between polymorphisms and phenotypes. RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed a significantly increased chance of TR in children carrying 3435TC genotype (OR=5.13, 95% CI=1.18-22.25; overdominant model). Moreover, INS patients under 6 years of age had significantly decreased frequencies of MDR1 1236CC (7.7% vs. 35%, p=0.029) or 2677GG (3.8% vs. 30.0%, p=0.033) genotypes. We also observed that patients with minimal change in disease and patients under 6 years of age at the onset of INS were initial responders more frequently when compared with children with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and patients ≥6 years old at the onset (p=0.0001, p=0.027, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that prednisone TR may be influenced by histology, age at the onset of INS, and MDR1 3435T>C polymorphism. The MDR1 1236T>C and 2677T>G polymorphisms were significantly associated with age at onset. Larger multicenter studies and studies across other ethnic groups are needed to elucidate the contradictory implications of MDR1 polymorphisms with INS in children.

Association between polymorphisms of XRCC1, p53 and MDR1 genes, the expression of their protein products and prognostic significance in human breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine the relationship between XRCC1, p53 and MDR1 protein, along with polymorphisms of their genes and their prognostic values in breast cancer. The following clinical and pathological parameters were evaluated: histopathological type of tumor, grade, stage, Her2/neu expression, ER, PR positivity and involvement of regional lymph nodes. MATERIAL/METHODS: Expression of proteins was determined in 39 samples of breast cancer by immunohistochemistry. Nucleotide polymorphisms were analyzed by PCR-RFLP. For statistical analysis, chi-square test (Yates), Fisher's exact test, and correlation test were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The highest protein expression was immunohistochemically found in MDR1 protein, with 54% of samples testing positive. In addition, the evaluation of MDR1 expression revealed higher positive immunoreactivity in lobular (LIC) and other types of tumor in comparison to ductal (DIC) type. The expression of p53 and XRCC1 protein was equal, but lower compared to MDR1, both testing positive in 36% of all tissue samples. Comparison of XRCC1 protein and histopathological type of tumor revealed that DIC and LIC types were mostly XRCC1-negative, while other types, papillary and mucinous were more likely to be XRCC1-positive. Interestingly, when evaluating LIC samples separately, a negative correlation between the Her2/neu and expression of XRCC1 was detected. Apparently, all Her2/neu-positive samples were XRCC1-negative (6/86%). The correlation test indicated a negative correlation between Her2/neu-positive samples and XRCC1-negative specimens (r = 1, p < 0.05). Statistical analysis did not reveal a correlation of p53 expression with clinical and pathological parameters. Similarly, no statistically significant difference was found between the tested polymorphisms and protein expression. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find statistically significant correlation between tested polymorphisms and their protein expression.

Polymorphisms of the XRCC1 and XPD genes and breast cancer risk: a case-control study.

The purpose of this case control study was to evaluate the role of X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) and xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD) genotypes as genetic indicators of susceptibility to breast cancer (BC). We analysed DNA samples from 114 breast cancer patients and 113 control subjects using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. For the single nucleotide polymorphisms in XRCC1 exon 10 (Arg399Gln, G/A) and XPD exon 23 (Lys751Gln, A/C), no remarkable differences for genotype distribution and allele frequencies were observed between BC group and control group in the study. The genotype frequency for homozygote A/A in XPD exon 6 (Arg156Arg, C/A) were significantly different between BC and control groups (P < 0.0001, odds ratio = 2.14; 95% confidence interval 1.44-3.17). The data indicate a possible role for XPD (Arg156Arg, C/A) polymorphisms in BC susceptibility.

[DNA repair--a new molecular target of anticancer therapy]. / DNA reparacný systém --nový ciel' antikancerogénnej liecby.

DNA-damaging agents and radiation have a central role besides other cancer treatment modalities currently. The balance between DNA damage and capacity of DNA repair mechanisms determines the final therapeutic outcome. An elevated ability of cancer cells to recognize DNA damage and initiate DNA repair pathways is an important mechanism for therapeutic resistance and has a negative impact upon therapeutic efficacy. Pharmacological inhibition of recently detected targets of DNA repair with several small-molecule compounds, therefore, has the potential to enhance the cytotoxicity of anticancer agents.