Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
PLoS Genet ; 17(11): e1009843, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34780465

ABSTRACT

Intergenic transcription is a common feature of eukaryotic genomes and performs important and diverse cellular functions. Here, we investigate the iab-8 ncRNA from the Drosophila Bithorax Complex and show that this RNA is able to repress the transcription of genes located at its 3' end by a sequence-independent, transcriptional interference mechanism. Although this RNA is expressed in the early epidermis and CNS, we find that its repressive activity is limited to the CNS, where, in wild-type embryos, it acts on the Hox gene, abd-A, located immediately downstream of it. The CNS specificity is achieved through a 3' extension of the transcript, mediated by the neuronal-specific, RNA-binding protein, ELAV. Loss of ELAV activity eliminates the 3' extension and results in the ectopic activation of abd-A. Thus, a tissue-specific change in the length of a ncRNA is used to generate a precise pattern of gene expression in a higher eukaryote.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , ELAV Proteins/genetics , Genes, Homeobox , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription, Genetic , Animals , Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Genes, Reporter , MicroRNAs/genetics , RNA, Long Noncoding/genetics , Sequence Deletion
2.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(39)2021 09 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34551972

ABSTRACT

Suberin is a hydrophobic biopolymer that can be deposited at the periphery of cells, forming protective barriers against biotic and abiotic stress. In roots, suberin forms lamellae at the periphery of endodermal cells where it plays crucial roles in the control of water and mineral transport. Suberin formation is highly regulated by developmental and environmental cues. However, the mechanisms controlling its spatiotemporal regulation are poorly understood. Here, we show that endodermal suberin is regulated independently by developmental and exogenous signals to fine-tune suberin deposition in roots. We found a set of four MYB transcription factors (MYB41, MYB53, MYB92, and MYB93), each of which is individually regulated by these two signals and is sufficient to promote endodermal suberin. Mutation of these four transcription factors simultaneously through genome editing leads to a dramatic reduction in suberin formation in response to both developmental and environmental signals. Most suberin mutants analyzed at physiological levels are also affected in another endodermal barrier made of lignin (Casparian strips) through a compensatory mechanism. Through the functional analysis of these four MYBs, we generated plants allowing unbiased investigation of endodermal suberin function, without accounting for confounding effects due to Casparian strip defects, and were able to unravel specific roles of suberin in nutrient homeostasis.


Subject(s)
Arabidopsis Proteins/metabolism , Arabidopsis/growth & development , Lipids/physiology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myb/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Arabidopsis/genetics , Arabidopsis/metabolism , Arabidopsis Proteins/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myb/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics
3.
Genetics ; 210(2): 573-585, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30082280

ABSTRACT

Boundaries (insulators) in the Drosophila bithorax complex (BX-C) delimit autonomous regulatory domains that orchestrate the parasegment (PS)-specific expression of the BX-C homeotic genes. The Fab-7 boundary separates the iab-6 and iab-7 regulatory domains, which control Abd-B expression in PS11 and PS12, respectively. This boundary is composed of multiple functionally redundant elements and has two key functions: it blocks cross talk between iab-6 and iab-7 and facilitates boundary bypass. Here, we show that two BEN domain protein complexes, Insensitive and Elba, bind to multiple sequences located in the Fab-7 nuclease hypersensitive regions. Two of these sequences are recognized by both Insv and Elba and correspond to a CCAATTGG palindrome. Elba also binds to a related CCAATAAG sequence, while Insv does not. However, the third Insv recognition sequences is ∼100 bp in length and contains the CCAATAAG sequence at one end. Both Insv and Elba are assembled into large complexes (∼420 and ∼265-290 kDa, respectively) in nuclear extracts. Using a sensitized genetic background, we show that the Insv protein is required for Fab-7 boundary function and that PS11 identity is not properly established in insv mutants. This is the first demonstration that a BEN domain protein is important for the functioning of an endogenous fly boundary.


Subject(s)
Co-Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Insulator Elements , Animals , Co-Repressor Proteins/genetics , Drosophila , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Embryonic Development/genetics , Protein Binding , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism
4.
Genetics ; 205(2): 589-603, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28007886

ABSTRACT

Chromatin boundary elements subdivide chromosomes in multicellular organisms into physically independent domains. In addition to this architectural function, these elements also play a critical role in gene regulation. Here we investigated the evolution of a Drosophila Bithorax complex boundary element called Fab-7, which is required for the proper parasegment specific expression of the homeotic Abd-B gene. Using a "gene" replacement strategy, we show that Fab-7 boundaries from two closely related species, D. erecta and D. yakuba, and a more distant species, D. pseudoobscura, are able to substitute for the melanogaster boundary. Consistent with this functional conservation, the two known Fab-7 boundary factors, Elba and LBC, have recognition sequences in the boundaries from all species. However, the strategies used for maintaining binding and function in the face of sequence divergence is different. The first is conventional, and depends upon conservation of the 8 bp Elba recognition sequence. The second is unconventional, and takes advantage of the unusually large and flexible sequence recognition properties of the LBC boundary factor, and the deployment of multiple LBC recognition elements in each boundary. In the former case, binding is lost when the recognition sequence is altered. In the latter case, sequence divergence is accompanied by changes in the number, relative affinity, and location of the LBC recognition elements.


Subject(s)
Chromatin/genetics , Drosophila/genetics , Evolution, Molecular , Insulator Elements , Animals , Conserved Sequence , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism
5.
PLoS Genet ; 12(7): e1006188, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27428541

ABSTRACT

Functionally autonomous regulatory domains direct the parasegment-specific expression of the Drosophila Bithorax complex (BX-C) homeotic genes. Autonomy is conferred by boundary/insulator elements that separate each regulatory domain from its neighbors. For six of the nine parasegment (PS) regulatory domains in the complex, at least one boundary is located between the domain and its target homeotic gene. Consequently, BX-C boundaries must not only block adventitious interactions between neighboring regulatory domains, but also be permissive (bypass) for regulatory interactions between the domains and their gene targets. To elucidate how the BX-C boundaries combine these two contradictory activities, we have used a boundary replacement strategy. We show that a 337 bp fragment spanning the Fab-8 boundary nuclease hypersensitive site and lacking all but 83 bp of the 625 bp Fab-8 PTS (promoter targeting sequence) fully rescues a Fab-7 deletion. It blocks crosstalk between the iab-6 and iab-7 regulatory domains, and has bypass activity that enables the two downstream domains, iab-5 and iab-6, to regulate Abdominal-B (Abd-B) transcription in spite of two intervening boundary elements. Fab-8 has two dCTCF sites and we show that they are necessary both for blocking and bypass activity. However, CTCF sites on their own are not sufficient for bypass. While multimerized dCTCF (or Su(Hw)) sites have blocking activity, they fail to support bypass. Moreover, this bypass defect is not rescued by the full length PTS. Finally, we show that orientation is critical for the proper functioning the Fab-8 replacement. Though the inverted Fab-8 boundary still blocks crosstalk, it disrupts the topology of the Abd-B regulatory domains and does not support bypass. Importantly, altering the orientation of the Fab-8 dCTCF sites is not sufficient to disrupt bypass, indicating that orientation dependence is conferred by other factors.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Insulator Elements , Animals , Binding Sites , Chromatin/metabolism , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Genes, Homeobox , Genes, Insect , Male , Models, Genetic , Phenotype , Promoter Regions, Genetic
6.
Mech Dev ; 138 Pt 2: 133-140, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26277563

ABSTRACT

Homeotic genes are aligned on the chromosome in the order of the segments that they specify along the antero-posterior axis of the fly. In general the genes affecting the more posterior segments repress the more anterior genes, a phenomenon known as "posterior dominance". There is however a noticeable exception to this rule in the central nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster where the posterior Abd-B gene does not repress the immediately more anterior abd-A gene. Instead, abd-A repression is accomplished by a 92 kb-long ncRNA (the iab-8ncRNA) that is transcribed from the large inter-genic region between abd-A and Abd-B. This iab-8ncRNA encodes a microRNA to repress abd-A and also a second redundant repression mechanism acting in cis and thought to be transcriptional interference with the abd-A promoter. Using in situ hybridization, a previous work suggested that the iab8ncRNA transcript forms discrete foci restricted to the nuclear periphery and that this localization may be important for its function. In order to better characterize the intra-cellular localization of the iab-8ncRNA we used the MS2-MCP system, which allows fluorescent labeling of RNA in cells and relies on the interaction between GFP-tagged MS2 coat protein (MCP-GFP) and MS2 RNA stem loops. Our results indicate that the large foci seen in previous studies correspond to the site of iab8ncRNA transcription and that the foci seen may simply be an indication of the level of transcription at the locus. We find no evidence to suggest that this localization is important for its function on abd-A repression. We discuss the idea that the iab-8ncRNA may be a relic of a more general ancient mechanism of posterior dominance during the emergence of the hox clusters that was mediated by transcriptional interference.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Green Fluorescent Proteins/metabolism , MicroRNAs/metabolism , Animals , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental/genetics , Genes, Homeobox/genetics , Genes, Insect/genetics , MicroRNAs/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Transcription, Genetic/genetics
7.
Mol Cell Biol ; 35(21): 3739-52, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26303531

ABSTRACT

Chromatin boundaries are architectural elements that determine the three-dimensional folding of the chromatin fiber and organize the chromosome into independent units of genetic activity. The Fab-7 boundary from the Drosophila bithorax complex (BX-C) is required for the parasegment-specific expression of the Abd-B gene. We have used a replacement strategy to identify sequences that are necessary and sufficient for Fab-7 boundary function in the BX-C. Fab-7 boundary activity is known to depend on factors that are stage specific, and we describe a novel ∼700-kDa complex, the late boundary complex (LBC), that binds to Fab-7 sequences that have insulator functions in late embryos and adults. We show that the LBC is enriched in nuclear extracts from late, but not early, embryos and that it contains three insulator proteins, GAF, Mod(mdg4), and E(y)2. Its DNA binding properties are unusual in that it requires a minimal sequence of >65 bp; however, other than a GAGA motif, the three Fab-7 LBC recognition elements display few sequence similarities. Finally, we show that mutations which abrogate LBC binding in vitro inactivate the Fab-7 boundary in the BX-C.


Subject(s)
Chromatin/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Animals , Chromatin/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation , Transcription Factors/metabolism
8.
Methods Mol Biol ; 1196: 279-89, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25151170

ABSTRACT

How transcription is controlled by distally located cis-regulatory elements is an active area of research in biology. As such, there have been many techniques developed to probe these long-distance chromatin interactions. Here, we focus on one such method, called DamID (van Steensel and Henikoff, Nat Biotechnol 18(4):424-428, 2000). While other methods like 3C (Dekker et al., Science 295(5558):1306-1311, 2002), 4C (Simonis et al., Nat Genet 38(11):1348-1354, 2006; Zhao et al., Nat Genet 38(11):1341-1347, 2006), and 5C (Dostie et al., Genome Res 16(10):1299-1309, 2006) are undoubtedly powerful, the DamID method can offer some advantages over these methods if the genetic locus can be easily modified. The lack of tissue fixation, the low amounts of starting material required to perform the experiment, and the relatively modest hardware requirements make DamID experiments an interesting alternative to consider when examining long-distance chromatin interactions.


Subject(s)
Chromatin/metabolism , Site-Specific DNA-Methyltransferase (Adenine-Specific)/metabolism , Animals , Binding Sites , Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly , DNA Methylation , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation , Genome , Protein Binding
9.
Development ; 135(24): 3983-7, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18987027

ABSTRACT

Although the boundary elements of the Drosophila Bithorax complex (BX-C) have properties similar to chromatin insulators, genetic substitution experiments have demonstrated that these elements do more than simply insulate adjacent cis-regulatory domains. Many BX-C boundaries lie between enhancers and their target promoter, and must modulate their activity to allow distal enhancers to communicate with their target promoter. Given this complex function, it is surprising that the numerous BX-C boundaries share little sequence identity. To determine the extent of the similarity between these elements, we tested whether different BX-C boundary elements can functionally substitute for one another. Using gene conversion, we exchanged the Fab-7 and Fab-8 boundaries within the BX-C. Although the Fab-8 boundary can only partially substitute for the Fab-7 boundary, we find that the Fab-7 boundary can almost completely replace the Fab-8 boundary. Our results suggest that although boundary elements are not completely interchangeable, there is a commonality to the mechanism by which boundaries function. This commonality allows different DNA-binding proteins to create functional boundaries.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/growth & development , Drosophila/genetics , Genes, Homeobox , Genes, Insect , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Animals , Base Sequence , Body Patterning/genetics , DNA Primers/genetics , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Female , Gene Conversion , Genetic Complementation Test , Male , Multigene Family , Promoter Regions, Genetic
10.
Development ; 133(15): 2983-93, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16818450

ABSTRACT

The three homeotic genes of the bithorax complex (BX-C), Ubx, abd-A and Abd-B control the identity of the posterior thorax and all abdominal segments. Large segment-specific cis-regulatory regions control the expression of Ubx, abd-A or Abd-B in each of the segments. These segment-specific cis-regulatory regions span the whole 300 kb of the BX-C and are arranged on the chromosome in the same order as the segments they specify. Experiments with lacZ reporter constructs revealed the existence of several types of regulatory elements in each of the cis-regulatory regions. These include initiation elements, maintenance elements, cell type- or tissue-specific enhancers, chromatin insulators and the promoter targeting sequence. In this paper, we extend the analysis of regulatory elements within the BX-C by describing a series of internal deficiencies that affect the Abd-B regulatory region. Many of the elements uncovered by these deficiencies are further verified in transgenic reporter assays. Our results highlight four key features of the iab-5, iab-6 and iab-7 cis-regulatory region of Abd-B. First, the whole Abd-B region is modular by nature and can be divided into discrete functional domains. Second, each domain seems to control specifically the level of Abd-B expression in only one parasegment. Third, each domain is itself modular and made up of a similar set of definable regulatory elements. And finally, the activity of each domain is absolutely dependent on the presence of an initiator element.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Animals , Body Patterning , Embryo, Nonmammalian/physiology , Gene Deletion , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Mutagenesis
11.
Nat Genet ; 38(8): 931-5, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16823379

ABSTRACT

A cis-regulatory region of nearly 300 kb controls the expression of the three bithorax complex (BX-C) homeotic genes: Ubx, abd-A and Abd-B. Interspersed between the numerous enhancers and silencers within the complex are elements called domain boundaries. Recently, many pieces of evidence have suggested that boundaries function to create autonomous domains by interacting among themselves and forming chromatin loops. In order to test this hypothesis, we used Dam identification to probe for interactions between the Fab-7 boundary and other regions in the BX-C. We were surprised to find that the targeting of Dam methyltransferase (Dam) to the Fab-7 boundary results in a strong methylation signal at the Abd-Bm promoter, approximately 35 kb away. Moreover, this methylation pattern is found primarily in the tissues where Abd-B is not expressed and requires an intact Fab-7 boundary. Overall, our work provides the first documented example of a dynamic, long-distance physical interaction between distal regulatory elements within a living, multicellular organism.


Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Genes, Homeobox , Genes, Insect , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , DNA Methylation , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Genes, Regulator , Multigene Family , Site-Specific DNA-Methyltransferase (Adenine-Specific)/genetics
12.
Genes Dev ; 19(15): 1755-60, 2005 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16077005

ABSTRACT

Polycomb response elements (PREs) are cis-acting DNA elements that mediate epigenetic gene silencing by Polycomb group (PcG) proteins. Here, we report that Pleiohomeotic (PHO) and a multiprotein Polycomb core complex (PCC) bind highly cooperatively to PREs. We identified a conserved sequence motif, named PCC-binding element (PBE), which is required for PcG silencing in vivo. PHO sites and PBEs function as an integrated DNA platform for the synergistic assembly of a repressive PHO/PCC complex. We termed this nucleoprotein complex silenceosome to reflect that the molecular principles underpinning its assemblage are surprisingly similar to those that make an enhanceosome.


Subject(s)
DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Epigenesis, Genetic , Transcription Factors/genetics , Animals , Base Sequence , Gene Silencing , Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 , Polycomb-Group Proteins , Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...