Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Plan Pract Res ; 37(1): 111-130, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35153364

ABSTRACT

The form of human settlements impacts on planetary health, population health and health equity. Yet goals for urban and territorial planning are only tangentially linked to public health outcomes. The WHO and UN-Habitat support actions to bring health to the fore in planning and design of human settlements, recently publishing 'Integrating Health in Urban and Territorial Planning: a sourcebook' focusing on 'why' action is needed, 'how' to initiate it; and curating several existing resources on 'what' to do. Recommendations for research, policy and practice include calls for rapid development of closer relationships between public health and spatial planning.

2.
J Surg Res ; 229: 357-364, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29937014

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Trauma is the cause of 1.2 million deaths in India annually. Injury severity scores play an important role in trauma research and care because these scores enable the adjustment of trauma severity when comparing mortality outcomes. The generalizability of the International Classification of Diseases Injury Severity Score (ICISS) between different populations is not fully known, and the validity of the ICISS has not been assessed in the Indian context. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive performances of three international versions of the ICISS, derived from data from Australia, New Zealand and pooled data from seven different high-income countries, in trauma patients admitted to four public hospitals in urban India. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used patient data from an Indian cohort of 16,047 trauma patients. The patients were assigned an ICISS based on International Classification of Diseases codes using survival risk ratios from publicly available data sets from Australia and New Zealand and with pooled data from seven different high-income countries. Predicted mortality based on the ICISS was compared with observed patient mortality, and the predictive performance was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: Discrimination and calibration did not reach the threshold for predictive performance in any of the ICISS versions used. The threshold value used was 0.8 for discrimination, which was not significantly different from one for the calibration slope and not significantly different from zero for the calibration intercept. CONCLUSIONS: None of the international versions of the ICISS adequately predicted mortality within the study population, indicating the need for an ICISS version specifically adapted to the Indian context.


Subject(s)
Health Services Needs and Demand , Injury Severity Score , International Classification of Diseases , Urban Health/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Australia , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , New Zealand , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
3.
PLoS One ; 13(6): e0199754, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29949624

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Trauma is predicted to become the third leading cause of death in India by 2020, which indicate the need for urgent action. Trauma scores such as the international classification of diseases injury severity score (ICISS) have been used with great success in trauma research and in quality programmes to improve trauma care. To this date no valid trauma score has been developed for the Indian population. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study used a dataset of 16047 trauma-patients from four public university hospitals in urban India, which was divided into derivation and validation subsets. All injuries in the dataset were assigned an international classification of disease (ICD) code. Survival Risk Ratios (SRRs), for mortality within 24 hours and 30 days were then calculated for each ICD-code and used to calculate the corresponding ICISS. Score performance was measured using discrimination by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROCC) and calibration by calculating the calibration slope and intercept to plot a calibration curve. RESULTS: Predictions of 30-day mortality showed an AUROCC of 0.618, calibration slope of 0.269 and calibration intercept of 0.071. Estimates of 24-hour mortality consistently showed low AUROCCs and negative calibration slopes. CONCLUSIONS: We attempted to derive and validate a version of the ICISS using SRRs calculated from an Indian population. However, the developed ICISS-scores overestimate mortality and implementing these scores in clinical or policy contexts is not recommended. This study, as well as previous reports, suggest that other scoring systems might be better suited for India and other Low- and middle-income countries until more data are available.


Subject(s)
Trauma Severity Indices , Wounds and Injuries/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...