Near-infrared spectroscopy in evaluating psychogenic pseudosyncope-a novel diagnostic approach.

BACKGROUND: Psychogenic pseudosyncope (PPS), a conversion disorder and syncope mimic, accounts for a large proportion of 'unexplained syncope'. PPS is diagnosed by reproduction of patients' symptoms during head-up tilt (HUT). Electroencephalogram (EEG), a time consuming and resource intensive technology, is used during HUT to demonstrate absence of cerebral hypoperfusion during transient loss of consciousness (TLOC). Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a simple, non-invasive technology for continuous monitoring of cerebral perfusion. We present a series of patients for whom PPS diagnosis was supported by NIRS during HUT. METHODS: Eight consecutive patients with suspected PPS referred to a syncope unit underwent evaluation. During HUT, continuous beat-to-beat blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and NIRS-derived tissue saturation index (TSI) were measured. BP, HR and TSI at baseline, time of first symptom, presyncope and apparent TLOC were measured. Patients were given feedback and followed for symptom recurrence. RESULTS: Eight predominantly female patients (6/8, 75%) aged 31 years (16-54) were studied with (5/8, 63%) having comorbid psychiatric diagnoses, and (5/8, 63%) presenting with frequent episodes of prolonged TLOC with eyes closed (6/8, 75%). All patients experienced reproduction of typical events during HUT. Systolic BP (mmHg) increased from baseline (129.7 (interquartile range [IQR] 124.9-133.4)) at TLOC (153.0 (IQR 146.7-159.0)) (P-value = 0.012). HR (bpm) increased from baseline 78 (IQR 68.6-90.0) to 115.7 (IQR 93.5-127.9) (P-value = 0.012). TSI (%) remained stable throughout, 71.4 (IQR 67.5-72.9) at baseline vs. 71.0 (IQR 68.2-73.0) at TLOC (P-value = 0.484). CONCLUSIONS: NIRS provides a non-invasive surrogate of cerebral perfusion during HUT. We propose HUT incorporating NIRS monitoring in the diagnostic algorithm for patients with suspected PPS.

The cross-sectional association between diabetes and orthostatic hypotension in community-dwelling older people.

AIMS: Orthostatic hypotension is a recognized complication of diabetes, but studies examining prevalence in diabetes are limited. The aim of this study was to ascertain the prevalence of orthostatic hypotension and the pattern of orthostatic BP response in a cohort of people with diabetes aged ≥ 50 years, embedded within the Irish Longitudinal Study of Ageing. METHODS: Orthostatic hypotension was defined as a drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 20 mmHg or drop in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 10 mmHg at 30 s after standing. Diabetes was defined by self-report but cross-checked against HbA1c and medication records. Multilevel mixed effects linear regression models were used to compare orthostatic BP in people with and without diabetes. RESULTS: Some 3222 people were included, 7% (213 of 3222) of whom had diabetes. Prevalence of orthostatic hypotension in the group with diabetes was 22% (46 of 213) vs. 13% in those without diabetes; χ2 = 12.43; P < 0.001. Multilevel models demonstrated prolonged recovery of DBP in people with diabetes, with only 41% (87 of 213) returning to baseline by 60 s. Logistic regression models demonstrated that diabetes was associated with a significantly increased likelihood of orthostatic hypotension (odds ratio 1.84, 95% confidence interval 1.30-2.59; P = 0.001) and this remained robust after controlling for covariates. CONCLUSION: Over one-fifth of older people with diabetes had orthostatic hypotension. Recovery of DBP is related to dynamic changes in total peripheral resistance and impairment of this baroreflex-mediated response may explain the higher prevalence in diabetes. Given the prognostic implications when co-existing with diabetes, orthostatic hypotension may represent a potentially modifiable risk factor for adverse outcomes in late-life diabetes.

The association between antidepressant use and orthostatic hypotension in older people: a matched cohort study.

Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is often reported as a significant potential adverse effect of antidepressant use but the association between phasic blood pressure (BP) and antidepressants has not yet been investigated. This cross-sectional study compares continuously measured phasic BP and prevalence of OH in a cohort of antidepressant users ≥50 years compared with an age- and sex-matched cohort not taking antidepressants. OH was defined as a drop in systolic BP ≥ 20 mm Hg or in diastolic BP ≥ 10 mm Hg at 30 seconds after standing, measured using continuous beat-to-beat finometry. Multilevel time × group interactions revealed significantly greater systolic and diastolic BP drop in antidepressant users than nonusers at 30 seconds after stand. The prevalence of OH among antidepressant users was 31% (63/206), compared with 17% in nonusers (X2 = 9.7; P = .002). Unadjusted logistic regression models demonstrated that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use was associated with OH at an odds ratio of 2.11 (95% confidence interval: 1.25-3.57); P = .005, and this association was not attenuated when covariates including cardiac disease and depressive symptom burden were added. There was no statistically significant association between serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor or tricyclic antidepressant use and OH in unadjusted models although the study was not powered to detect changes within these subgroups. Older people taking antidepressants have a two-fold higher prevalence of OH than nonusers, highlighting the importance of screening the older antidepressant user for OH and dizziness and rationalizing medications to reduce the risk of falls within this vulnerable cohort.