ABSTRACT
Numerous COVID-19 vaccines are authorized globally. To date, [~]71% of doses are comprised of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, and [~]17% the Moderna/NIH vaccine, both of which are mRNA-based. The chimpanzee Ad-based Oxford/AstraZeneca (AZ) vaccine comprises [~]9%, while the Johnson & Johnson/Janssen (J&J) human adenovirus (Ad26) vaccine ranks 4th at [~]2% [1]. No COVID-19 vaccines are yet available for children 0-4. One method to protect this population may be passive immunization via antibodies (Abs) provided in the milk of a lactating vaccinated person. Our early work [2] and other reports [3-5] have demonstrated that unlike the post-SARS-CoV-2 infection milk Ab profile, which is rich in specific secretory (s)IgA, the vaccine response is highly IgG-dominant. In this report, we present a comparative assessment of the milk Ab response elicited by Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, and AZ vaccines. This analysis revealed 86% -100% of mRNA vaccine recipient milk exhibited Spike-specific IgG endpoint titers, which were 12 - 28-fold higher than those measured for Ad vaccine recipient milk. Ad-based vaccines elicited Spike-specific milk IgG in only 33%-38% of recipients. Specific IgA was measured in 52%-71% of mRNA vaccine recipient milk and 17%-23% of Ad vaccine recipient milk. J&J recipient milk exhibited significantly lower IgA than Moderna recipients, and AZ recipients exhibited significantly lower IgA titers than Moderna and Pfizer. <50% of milk of any group exhibited specific secretory Ab, with Moderna recipient IgA titers measuring significantly higher than AZ. Moderna appeared to most frequently elicit >2-fold increases in specific secretory Ab titer relative to pre-vaccine sample. These data indicate that current Ad-based COVID-19 vaccines poorly elicit Spike-specific Ab in milk compared to mRNA-based vaccines and that mRNA vaccines are preferred for immunizing the lactating population. This study highlights the need to design vaccines better aimed at eliciting an optimal milk Ab response.
