Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin ; 4(4): 2055217318813736, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30559971

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many physicians enter data into the electronic medical record (EMR) as unstructured free text and not as discrete data, making it challenging to use for quality improvement or research initiatives. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this research paper was to develop and implement a structured clinical documentation support (SCDS) toolkit within the EMR to facilitate quality initiatives and practice-based research in a multiple sclerosis (MS) practice. METHODS: We built customized EMR toolkits to capture standardized data at office visits. Content was determined through physician consensus on necessary elements to support best practices in treating patients with demyelinating disorders. We also developed CDS tools and best practice advisories within the toolkits to alert physicians when a quality improvement opportunity exists, including enrollment into our DNA biobanking study at the point of care. RESULTS: We have used the toolkit to evaluate 541 MS patients in our clinic and begun collecting longitudinal data on patients who return for annual visits. We provide a description and example screenshots of our toolkits, and a brief description of our cohort to date. CONCLUSIONS: The EMR can be effectively structured to standardize MS clinic office visits, capture data, and support quality improvement and practice-based research initiatives at the point of care.

2.
Headache ; 58(8): 1211-1218, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30066412

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To use the electronic medical record (EMR) to optimize patient care, facilitate documentation, and support quality improvement and practice-based research, in a headache specialty clinic. BACKGROUND: Many physicians enter data into the EMR as unstructured free text and not as discrete data. This makes it challenging to use data for quality improvement or research initiatives. METHODS: We describe the process of building a customized structured clinical documentation support toolkit, specific for patients seen in a headache specialty clinic. The content was developed through frequent physician meetings to reach consensus on elements that define clinical Best Practices. Tasks were assigned to the care team and data mapped to the progress note. RESULTS: The toolkit collects hundreds of fields of discrete, standardized data. Auto scored and interpreted score tests include the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item, Center for Epidemiology Studies Depression Scale, Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire, Insomnia Sleep Index, and Migraine-Specific Quality of Life. We have developed Best Practice Advisories (BPA) and other clinical documentation support tools that alert physicians, when appropriate. As of April 1, 2018, we have used the toolkits at 4346 initial patient visits. We provide screenshots of our toolkits, details of data fields collected, and diagnoses of patients at the initial visit. CONCLUSIONS: The EMR can be used to effectively structure and standardize headache clinic visits for quality improvement and practice-based research. We are sharing our proprietary toolkit with other clinics as part of the Neurology Practice-Based Research Network. These tools are also facilitating clinical research enrollment and a pragmatic trial of comparative effectiveness at the point-of-care among migraine patients.


Subject(s)
Documentation/methods , Electronic Health Records , Headache , Biomedical Research , Headache/diagnosis , Headache/therapy , Humans , Patient Care Team , Quality Improvement , User-Computer Interface
3.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 4(1): 60-4, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25787055

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous infection with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and a history of infectious mononucleosis (IM) have been previously associated with an increased risk of multiple sclerosis (MS). Whether there are common genetic factors that may partially explain these associations has not been thoroughly explored. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether select polymorphisms in genes associated with IM susceptibility are related to MS risk-a self-reported history of IM or antibody titer against Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 (anti-EBNA1). METHODS: A case-control study including 1213 MS cases and 454 controls enrolled in the Accelerated Cure Project for MS (ACP) Repository. Select polymorphisms in HLA-A, SH2D1A and IL15RA and anti-EBNA1 Ab titers were measured using stored blood samples provided by participants. Generalized linear models were used to assess the associations between select polymorphisms and odds of MS, odds of IM or anti-EBNA1 Ab titers. RESULTS: No significant associations were observed between the selected polymorphisms and odds of MS, odds of IM or anti-EBNA1 Ab titer. CONCLUSION: It is unlikely that any of the studied polymorphisms contribute to the explaining the association between anti-EBNA1 Ab titer or history of IM and MS.


Subject(s)
Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigens/genetics , Herpesvirus 4, Human/genetics , Multiple Sclerosis/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide/genetics , Adult , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/complications , Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigens/immunology , Female , HLA-A Antigens/genetics , Humans , Immunoglobulin G , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/etiology , Multiple Sclerosis/virology , Odds Ratio , Young Adult
4.
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...