[Prescriptions of statins in the elderly according to the type of healthcare establishment: An example of the usefulness of territorial hospital groups]. / Utilisations des statines chez le sujet âgé selon le type de prise en charge : un exemple de l'intérêt des groupements hospitaliers de territoire.

INTRODUCTION: The challenge of territorial hospital groups is to develop coherent care pathways for optimal patient care. Following the creation of a territorial pharmaceutical team, a common prescription review process was initiated in our health area. The objective of this study is to analyze the uses of statins in the elderly. METHOD: The study included all statin-treated patients older than 75 years at the five participating institutions (including long-term nursing homes). In a prospective multicenter study, the benefit/risk ratio of statin prescription has been assessed up. Depending on the clinical situation, a proposal to stop or adjust the dosage could be made. RESULTS: Nine hundred and forty-seven patients were included. Among them, 184 were treated with a statin. Forty-seven patients (26%) are treated in primary prevention and 137 patients (74%) in secondary prevention. Dosages are lower for long stays. Fifteen treatments interruption were accepted out of 44 proposals, mostly for long stays. The reasons given to continue treatment are the need for a new evaluation by a cardiologist or a high cardiovascular risk. CONCLUSION: The variability of results according to the type healthcare institution makes territorial medical and pharmaceutical collaboration relevant. The challenge is to develop a coherent care pathway for optimal care of elderly patients, with congruent objectives.

[What academic training for pharmacy students for clinical pharmacy? Example of shared medication report]. / Quelle formation académique pour les nouvelles missions de pharmacie clinique à l'officine ? Exemple du bilan partagé de médication du sujet âgé.

OBJECTIVES: In 2018, the implementation of shared medication reports in pharmacy encourages pharmacists to cooperate with other healthcare professionals. This job allows a decrease of medication errors in elderly. This requires a reorganization of the training offered by universities (initial and continuing training). The aim is to present the results of this pedagogical experimentation. METHODS: The experimentation (years 2017-2018 and 2018-2019) required the creation of a course to allow students to carry out a pharmaceutical analysis suitable to elderly people, to set up and carry out a shared medication report in pharmacy. Then, during their 6th year internship, students had to carry out at least one shared medication report per month. A monthly follow-up was organized with a database online. RESULTS: Sixty-four students and 35 internship supervisors participated in the experimentation. All the students improved their ease in using clinical pharmacy tools (pharmaceutical analysis, pharmaceutical interventions, assessment of adherence, etc.). They carried out 345 shared medication reports. In 24.3% of cases, an improvement in the prescription was proposed to the doctor (general practitioner or specialist). For 80% of the internship supervisors, the initial training of the students helped to set up this new pharmacy activity. CONCLUSIONS: This teaching is appreciated by students and internship supervisors. It enabled the adoption of the various tools essential for carrying out shared medication reports in pharmacy. Shared medication reports reinforce the multidisciplinary work of pharmacists, especially with general practitioners.

Influenza vaccination coverage at community pharmacies: Positioning, needs, expectations and involvement of community pharmacists in the Franche-Comté region.

INTRODUCTION: Influenza vaccination coverage currently remains below the 75% recommended threshold by the World Health Organization. To correct this situation, experiments have been successively carried out in France to enable community pharmacists to vaccinate at-risk populations. In this context, a study was conducted with pharmacists from the French Franche-Comté region to evaluate their positioning, needs and expectations regarding influenza vaccination at community pharmacies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was created and sent to licensed pharmacists in March of 2018. This consisted of 4 parts: characteristics of the community pharmacy; positioning of the pharmacist regarding vaccinations carried out at the pharmacy; training needs and expectations; and willingness to implement vaccinations. RESULTS: The participation rate in this survey was 32% (137/427). More than 90% of the pharmacists agreed that community pharmacies' assets were adequate for the implementation of these vaccinations (accessibility and availability), although 52% considered this complicated. Their main fears were reluctance from patients and conflicts of interest with other health professionals authorized to vaccinate (58%). The needs and expectations regarding pharmacy student training were essential for 94% of them as well as continuous training of practicing pharmacists (96%). The willingness of pharmacists to vaccinate stemmed from the fact that influenza vaccination coverage would increase for at-risk subjects (36%). CONCLUSION: This survey allowed us to assess the favorable positioning and the real interest of pharmacists from Franche-Comté regarding the influenza vaccination done at community pharmacies, given the proviso that they were given relevant training and allocated adequate resources.

[Retrocession, a risk area in care pathway]. / Les rétrocessions, une zone à risque dans le parcours des patients.

OBJECTIVES: Medication errors are common at transitions points in care pathway. The pharmacist can secure patient care in "retrocession" (dispensing specific drugs by hospital pharmacy to outpatient) due to his prescription analysis (both regulatory and pharmacotherapeutic). The "retrocession" is a risk area in care pathway. The objective of this study is to evaluate iatrogenic and economic risks in "retrocession" dispense by identifying pharmaceutical interventions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective monocentric study performed during 8months in university hospital. All the prescriptions have been analyzed and divided into 3 categories: "first prescription" (a new prescription for a new treatment or a new patient), continued therapy with new prescription and prescription renewal. Therapeutic optimizations and regulatory pharmaceutical interventions performed have been systematically recorded. RESULTS: Among 7166 prescriptions analyzed, 161 pharmaceutical interventions (2.2%) are done. The highest rate of therapeutic optimizations and regulatory pharmaceutical interventions concern the "first prescription" category (9.3%). The most involved drugs in medication errors on a "first prescription" are cancer drugs (36%) and anti-infectives (24%). CONCLUSION: The first dispensation in "retrocession" is the riskiest step, especially with pharmacotherapeutic intervention. Thanks to pharmacist counseling sessions, especially in oncology, this risk is better controlled. This study demonstrates the interest of developing pharmacist counseling sessions for the treatment's introduction regardless of therapeutic class.

[Interest of several pharmaceutical activities to secure the care pathway of elderly patients?] / Sécurisation du parcours de soins du sujet âgé : intérêt d'une offre variée d'activités pharmaceutiques ?

OBJECTIVES: In order to prevent medication errors during patient's care pathway, all transition steps must be secured. The main objective of this study was to assess the interest of medication review at hospital discharge on the sustainability of therapeutic optimizations made during hospitalisation in a geriatric population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a three months prospective, single-centre study performed in an acute geriatric unit of a university hospital. All patients hospitalized during the study were included. They were divided in two groups: the securing pathway (SP) group with admission reconciliation, step 3 prescription analysis (according to the French Society of clinical pharmacy) and medication review at hospital discharge were compared to the not concerned group (NSP) with only a step 2 (according to the French Society of clinical pharmacy) prescriptions analysis. The Medication Regimen Complexity Index was used to quantify the complexity of medication regimens. RESULTS: In total, 53 patients of the SP group and 44 patients of the NSP group got the benefit of whole clinical pharmaceutical activities put in places. The average medications on discharge's drug prescription is lower in SP group (SP 8.4±3.4 medications and NSP 9.6±3.2 medications, P=0.06). The discharge's drug prescription complexity index is lower in SP group compared to NSP group (SP 27.9±9.8 and NSP 32.7±11.5, P=0.02). The same trend is observed 30 days post discharge. CONCLUSION: A medication review at hospital discharge reduces the subsequent drug prescription's complexity score. This multidisciplinary dynamic makes easier the communication between health care professionals and contributes to strengthen the city-hospital link.