Infantile Hemangiomas Lose Vascular Endothelial Cadherin During Involution: Potential Role in Cell Death?

Background: Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are benign endothelial cell (EC) tumors that undergo a predictable natural history, with rapid proliferation, stabilization, and involution. However, mechanisms regulating these transitions are not well understood. We have observed loss of vascular endothelial cadherin (VECAD) in involuting/involuted IHs. VECAD plays a critical role in angiogenesis, cell cycle progression, and EC survival. We hypothesize that loss of VECAD is associated with apoptosis occurring during IH involution. Methods: Resected IH samples were clinically categorized as proliferating (n = 4), stable (n = 4), or involuting/involuted (n = 5). Neonatal dermal tissues were used as controls (n = 5). Immunohistochemistry was conducted on sectioned specimens using antibodies against EC markers VECAD and CD31. Apoptosis was assessed with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling assay. Results: CD31 signal intensity in proliferating, stable, and involuting/involuted IH ECs was unchanged relative to each other and to control ECs. VECAD signal significantly and progressively diminished as IHs progressed from proliferation to involution. Involuting/involuted IHs had significantly reduced VECAD expression compared with control ECs (P < 0.0001), proliferating IHs (P < 0.0001), and stable IHs (P < 0.001). As expected, the number of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling-positive ECs was significantly higher in involuting/involuted IHs (P < 0.05) relative to control ECs and proliferating IHs. Conclusions: Loss of VECAD expression in IH endothelium corresponded to IH involution and increased apoptosis. It is unclear whether loss of VECAD is causative of IH involution; further studies are needed to elucidate the role of VECAD function in EC survival.

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: Weighing the risks of delayed chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with unilateral breast cancer opt for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) at the time of therapeutic mastectomy (immediate CPM) or following completion of adjuvant therapy. Studies show that immediate CPM increases the risk of surgical complications related to unilateral mastectomy (UM) alone, which may lead to delays in adjuvant therapy initiation. However, it is unclear if these complications cause clinically significant delays in initiating adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or hormonal therapy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with breast cancer who underwent immediate CPM versus UM alone at Columbia University Medical Center from January 2000 to December 2020. Patient demographic and oncologic characteristics; complications; and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and/or hormonal therapy relative to therapeutic mastectomy were collected. RESULTS: In this study, 239 UM alone patients were propensity score matched to 239 immediate CPM patients. No significant difference in complication rates was found between the index and contralateral breasts in CPM patients. A similar percentage of CPM and UM patients experienced postoperative complications (19% vs. 17%, p = 0.64). No significant difference in time to adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or hormonal therapy was found between CPM patients with complications and all CPM patients or all UM patients. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of clear guidance for clinical decision-making regarding timing of CPM relative to adjuvant therapy. Our study suggests that immediate CPM does not significantly increase the risks of postoperative complications or complication-related delays in the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or hormonal therapy. This information may help patients and providers to plan, select, and schedule breast cancer treatment options.

Utilization of Healthcare Resources by Vascular Anomaly Patients: An Assessment of Healthcare Burden by Lesion Complexity.

Background: Vascular anomalies (VAs) are heterogeneous lesions. Symptoms vary widely by lesion type and complexity. VA patients often require life-long interdisciplinary care; however, there is a paucity of data on the healthcare utilization of VA patients, and their burden on the healthcare system remains largely unquantified. We hypothesize that healthcare utilization by complex lymphatic malformation (LM) and venous malformation (VM) patients will be significantly higher compared with simple LM and VM patients. Methods: A retrospective, longitudinal study was performed of LM/VM patients seen through multidisciplinary VA clinics between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020. Data were collected from each patient's first presentation through December 31, 2021 and included number of office visits, imaging studies, specialists involved, procedures, hospitalization data, and approximate costs, normalized to per year utilization. Patients were divided into "simple" and "complex" LMs/VMs. Involvement of the airway, more than one anatomic area, and/or complex lymphatic anomalies were defined as "complex." Results: In total, 28 simple and 29 complex LM patients and 51 simple and 18 complex VM patients were identified. Complex LM and VM patients had significantly higher numbers of imaging studies, specialists involved, procedures and hospitalizations, and costs incurred. Complex LM patients also had significantly higher per year office visits. Conclusions: VA care is chronic and costly, especially for complex LM/VM patients. LM/VM complexity was a predictor for increased inpatient and outpatient healthcare utilization and higher costs. Better awareness of the healthcare utilization trends of LM/VM patients will allow for improved counseling for these patients regarding prognosis and expectations.

Pathophysiology of Slow-Flow Vascular Malformations: Current Understanding and Unanswered Questions.

Background: Slow-flow vascular malformations include venous, lymphatic, and lymphaticovenous malformations. Recent studies have linked genetic variants hyperactivating either the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and/or RAS/RAF/MAPK signaling pathways with slow-flow vascular malformation development, leading to the use of pharmacotherapies such as sirolimus and alpelisib. It is important that clinicians understand basic and translational research advances in slow-flow vascular malformations. Methods: A literature review of basic science publications in slow-flow vascular malformations was performed on Pubmed, using search terms "venous malformation," "lymphatic malformation," "lymphaticovenous malformation," "genetic variant," "genetic mutation," "endothelial cells," and "animal model." Relevant publications were reviewed and summarized. Results: The study of patient tissues and the use of primary pathogenic endothelial cells from vascular malformations shed light on their pathological behaviors, such as endothelial cell hyperproliferation and disruptions in vessel architecture. The use of xenograft and transgenic animal models confirmed the pathogenicity of genetic variants and allowed for preclinical testing of potential therapies. These discoveries underscore the importance of basic and translational research in understanding the pathophysiology of vascular malformations, which will allow for the development of improved biologically targeted treatments. Conclusion: Despite basic and translation advances, a cure for slow-flow vascular malformations remains elusive. Many questions remain unanswered, including how genotype variants result in phenotypes, and genotype-phenotype heterogeneity. Continued research into venous and lymphatic malformation pathobiology is critical in understanding the mechanisms by which genetic variants contribute to vascular malformation phenotypic features.

Regulation of the error-prone DNA polymerase Polκ by oncogenic signaling and its contribution to drug resistance.

The DNA polymerase Polκ plays a key role in translesion synthesis, an error-prone replication mechanism. Polκ is overexpressed in various tumor types. Here, we found that melanoma and lung and breast cancer cells experiencing stress from oncogene inhibition up-regulated the expression of Polκ and shifted its localization from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. This effect was phenocopied by inhibition of the kinase mTOR, by induction of ER stress, or by glucose deprivation. In unstressed cells, Polκ is continually transported out of the nucleus by exportin-1. Inhibiting exportin-1 or overexpressing Polκ increased the abundance of nuclear-localized Polκ, particularly in response to the BRAFV600E-targeted inhibitor vemurafenib, which decreased the cytotoxicity of the drug in BRAFV600E melanoma cells. These observations were analogous to how Escherichia coli encountering cell stress and nutrient deprivation can up-regulate and activate DinB/pol IV, the bacterial ortholog of Polκ, to induce mutagenesis that enables stress tolerance or escape. However, we found that the increased expression of Polκ was not excessively mutagenic, indicating that noncatalytic or other functions of Polκ could mediate its role in stress responses in mammalian cells. Repressing the expression or nuclear localization of Polκ might prevent drug resistance in some cancer cells.