Association between potentially inappropriate medications prescription and health-related quality of life among US older adults.

BACKGROUND: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are associated with worse health outcomes among older adults. Our objective was to examine the association between PIM prescription and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among older adults in the United States using nationally representative data. METHODS: This was a retrospective study utilizing 2011-2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data. Community dwelling US adults aged 65 years or older were included. A qualified definition operationalized from the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® was used to define exposure to PIMs during the study period. The Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) were used to measure HRQoL. Survey-weighted linear regression models were constructed to investigate the association between PIM exposure and participants' PCS and MCS scores. Analyses were stratified across three age cohorts (65-74, 75-85, and ≥85 years). RESULTS: Unadjusted analysis showed poorer scores in the PIM exposed group for both PCS and MCS (all p < 0.001). PIM exposure was associated with poorer PCS scores across all age groups with those aged 65-74 years (adjusted regression coefficient = -1.60 [95% CI = -2.27, -0.93; p < 0.001]), those 75-84 years (adjusted regression coefficient: -1.49 [95% CI = -2.45, -0.53; p = 0.003]), and those 85 years and older (adjusted regression coefficient = -1.65 [95% CI = -3.03, -0.27; p = 0.02]). PIM exposure was also associated with poorer MCS scores in participants aged 65-74 years (adjusted regression coefficient = -0.69 [95% CI = -1.16, -0.22; p = 0.004]) and 85 years and older (adjusted regression coefficient = -2.01 [95% CI = -3.25, -0.78; p = 0.002]). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that patients' exposure to PIMs is associated with poorer HRQoL. Further work is needed to assess whether interventions to deprescribe PIMs may help to improve patients' HRQoL.

Transitions of Care: Strategies for Medication Optimization and Deprescribing in Older Adults.

Older adults have an increased risk of adverse drug events related to polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use. These patients are even more vulnerable as they transition through different health care settings. In 2023, the American Geriatrics Society published an updated version of the Beers Criteria®, providing updated guidance on identifying and managing PIMs. Nurses and nurse practitioners play important roles in medication management across the continuum of care. The current article aims to illustrate key concepts regarding medication safety and deprescribing for older adult patients during transitions of care. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 49(12), 5-10.].

Patient and social factors related to nebulizer use in COPD patients at the transition of care: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Transition from hospital to home is a vulnerable period for patients with COPD exacerbations, with a high risk for readmission and mortality. Twenty percent of patients with an initial hospitalization for a COPD exacerbation are readmitted to a hospital within 30 days, costing the health care system over $15 billion annually. While nebulizer therapy directed at some high-risk COPD patients may improve the transition from hospital to home, patient and social factors are likely to contribute to difficulties with their use. Current literature describing the COPD patient's experience with utilizing nebulizer therapy, particularly during care transitions, is limited. Therefore, the objective of this study was to explore underlying COPD patient and social factors contributing to practical difficulties with nebulizer use at the care transition from hospital to home. METHODS: This was a qualitative study conducted between September 2020 and June 2022. Patients were included if they were ≥ 40 years old, had a current diagnosis of COPD, had an inpatient admission at a hospital, and were discharged directly to home with nebulizer therapy. Semi-structured, one-on-one interviews with patients were conducted covering a broad range of patient and social factors and their relationships with nebulizer use and readmission. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was performed using a mixed inductive and deductive approach. RESULTS: Twenty-one interviews were conducted, and subjects had a mean age of 64 ± 8.4 years, 62% were female, and 76% were White. The predominant interview themes were health care system interactions and medication management. The interviews highlighted that discharge counseling methods and depth of counseling from hospitals were inconsistent and were not always patient-friendly. They also suggested that patients could appropriately identify, set up, and utilize their nebulizer treatment without difficulties, but additional patient education is required for nebulizer clean up and maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: Our interviews suggest that there is room for improvement within the health care system for providing consistent, effective discharge counseling. Also, COPD patients discharged from a hospital on nebulizer therapy can access and understand their treatment but require additional education for nebulizer clean up and maintenance.

Impact of a pharmacist collaborative drug therapy management protocol on utilization of a discharge prescription program and hospital readmissions.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of a collaborative drug therapy management (CDTM) agreement allowing a pharmacist to automatically prescribe refills of discharge medications to patients' preferred outpatient pharmacy on utilization of a hospital discharge prescription program and hospital readmission rates. METHODS: This was a single-center, quasi-experimental pre-post intervention study. Patients aged 18 years or older discharged from the cardiology services to home were eligible for inclusion in the study. The CDTM agreement was initiated on July 1, 2019. Patients discharged to home from July 1, 2018, to June 30, 2019, were assigned to the historical control group. The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of patients who used the bedside medication delivery service at hospital discharge between the groups. Secondary outcomes included 30-day hospital readmissions and a descriptive analysis of medications prescribed by a pharmacist through the program. A χ2 test was used to assess the primary outcome, and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess hospital readmissions. RESULTS: In total, 1,704 and 2,200 patients were discharged in the control and CDTM groups, respectively. The CDTM group had a greater proportion of patients who participated in the discharge prescription program compared to the historical control group (77.8% vs 68.7%; P < 0.0001). There was no difference in 30-day hospital readmission rate between the groups (adjusted odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.23; P = 0.94). CONCLUSION: A CDTM protocol to improve the availability of medication refills at a patient's regular outpatient pharmacy improved utilization of a bedside medication delivery service but did not change 30-day readmission rates.

Transitions of care education in US colleges and schools of pharmacy.

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacist-led transitions of care (TOC) services have demonstrated a positive impact on patient care and professional pharmacy organizations recommend integration of TOC-related education into doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) curricula. The objective of this study is to determine the extent to which TOC is taught in United States (US) colleges and schools of pharmacy and to characterize the educational content and the instructional methods used. METHODS: An 18-question electronic survey about TOC education was sent to US school of pharmacy faculty. One survey response per school was requested. Schools with an accredited or candidate-status PharmD program were included and duplicate responses from schools were adjudicated and combined. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 54.6% (n = 77). Of the responding schools, 92.2% reported incorporating TOC content into their required didactic curriculum and 43.1% reported incorporating TOC content in their elective didactic curriculum. Of the 11 TOC-related topics included in the survey, 3 were covered universally in the required or elective didactic curricula of responding schools. Both lecture and active-learning pedagogies were used to teach TOC. Introductory pharmacy practice experiences and advanced pharmacy practice experiences that incorporate TOC were offered at 85.3% and 98.5% of schools, respectively. CONCLUSION: Most schools of pharmacy who responded to this survey included TOC-related content in their curricula. Research into best practices for educating students on this topic is needed to help ensure graduates are prepared to contribute to this area of practice.

Comparison of Higher-Than-Standard to D-Dimer Driven Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 is a global health threat often accompanied with coagulopathy. Despite use of thromboprophylaxis in this population, thrombotic event rates are high. Materials and methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study comparing the safety and effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis strategies at 2 institutions in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Regimen A utilized a higher-than-standard thromboprophylaxis dosage and Regimen B received full-dose anticoagulation for any D-dimer 3 mcg/mL or greater and prophylactic for less than 3 mcg/mL. The primary outcome compared the rate of thrombotic events between treatment groups. Secondary endpoints compared rates of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding as well as the proportion of patients in each group experiencing thrombotic events within 30 days of discharge. Results: One-hundred fifty-three patients were included in the analysis, 64 receiving Regimen A and 89 receiving Regimen B. Seven (4.6%) thrombotic events occurred, 3 (4.7%) in patients receiving Regimen A, and 4 (4.5%) in Regimen B (P = 1.0). Twelve patients (13.5%) receiving Regimen B had a bleeding event versus 2 (3.1%) in Regimen A (P = .04), half of which were major in each group. All patients who bled in either treatment group were receiving mechanical ventilation, and 12 of 14 were receiving full-dose anticoagulation. One patient receiving Regimen A was readmitted with a pulmonary embolism. Conclusions: In this study, the thromboprophylactic regimen impacted bleeding, but no significant difference was seen with thrombotic outcomes. Almost all patients who experienced a bleed were mechanically ventilated and receiving full-dose anticoagulation. The use of full-dose anticoagulation should be cautioned in this population without an additional indication.

Combination Therapy of Ezetimibe and Rosuvastatin for Dyslipidemia: Current Insights.

Cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of death around the world with various efforts being made to reduce risk in patients through preventive measures. One major method for prevention has been managing cholesterol, particularly low-density lipoprotein to decrease atherosclerotic plaque burden, potentially decreasing future cardiac complications. Statins have been the gold standard therapy for hypercholesterolemia treatment due to their ease of dosing, limited drug interactions, and favorable safety profile. Unfortunately, statin therapy alone is not always effective enough to adequately control a patient's elevated lipid levels and combination therapy may be warranted. Ezetimibe is commonly added to regimens to help augment cholesterol lowering by inhibiting the absorption of cholesterol. The recent approval of a combination tablet of high-intensity rosuvastatin and ezetimibe has introduced a potentially more beneficial option for cholesterol management in addition to the only available combination of moderate intensity simvastatin and ezetimibe. We aimed to identify potential beneficial effects of ezetimibe by comparing its use in combination with high-intensity rosuvastatin compared to a statin therapy alone or in combination with moderate intensity simvastatin through a literature review. The current evidence indicated that combination therapy outperformed statin monotherapy in reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and patients were more likely to achieve their target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal level. This suggests rosuvastatin/ezetimibe combination holds a potential place in therapy for patients requiring a more aggressive reduction in cholesterol to help prevent atherosclerotic disease.

Comparison of Bleeding Rates between Oral Anticoagulants in Combination with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (Triple Therapy) in a Real-World Cohort.

Background: Triple antithrombotic therapy including an anticoagulant, P2Y12 inhibitor, and aspirin increases bleed risk up to 27%. The components of this regimen can vary, which may impact bleed risk. Objective: To compare the safety of various triple antithrombotic regimens. Methods: An Institutional Review Board approved retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2014 to 2017. Patients admitted to a large urban health system on triple therapy were evaluated for inclusion. The primary outcome compared rates of International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding during index admission or within 90 days in patients receiving warfarin, rivaroxaban, or apixaban; aspirin; and a P2Y12 inhibitor. A multivariable logistic regression assessed the association between bleeding, antithrombotic use, and relevant confounding variables. Results: Three hundred and seventy-two patients were included: 238 patients received warfarin, 63 received rivaroxaban, and 71 received apixaban. Forty-five patients (12.1%) experienced a bleed, 25 of which (55.6%) were major. The rate of bleeding was 12.2% (n = 29) with warfarin, 14.3% (n = 9) with rivaroxaban, and 9.9% (n = 7) with apixaban (P = .7335). The use of prasugrel versus clopidogrel (OR 4.35, 95% CI 1.20-15.72; P = .025) and admission hemoglobin less than 12 mg/dL (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.28-5.04; P = .008) were identified as risk factors associated with bleeding in the model. Conclusion: In patients on triple antithrombotic therapy, choice of oral anticoagulant did not impact bleeding rates, but use of prasugrel and a low baseline hemoglobin were associated with increased bleed rates which warrants further investigation.

Early Versus Late Administration of P2Y 12 Inhibitors in Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Delayed Cardiac Catheterization.

ABSTRACT: Regardless of early invasive or ischemia-guided approaches to non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) management, P2Y 12 inhibitors remain the backbone in therapy. The ideal timing of administration remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of early versus late administration of P2Y 12 inhibitors in patients presenting with an NSTEMI who go to the catheterization laboratory beyond 24 hours from presentation. We performed a single center, retrospective cohort study. Patients were classified into groups depending on whether they received early versus late administration of a P2Y 12 inhibitor. The primary outcome was the rate of major and clinically relevant, nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB). Secondary outcomes included troponin peak and length of stay after cardiac catheterization. Of the 121 patients included, 53 patients were in the early and 68 patients were in the late group. The number of bleeding events were similar between both groups ( P = 1.00). There were 3 (5.7%) major bleeding events in the early group and 5 (7.4%) bleeding events in the late group. There were 5 (9.4%) CRNMB events in the early group and 6 (8.8%) CRNMB events in the late group. There was a significant difference in troponin peak, 4.56 ng/mL in the early group and 1.77 ng/mL in the late group ( P = 0.02). The rate of bleeding did not differ between patients who received early or late administration of P2Y 12 inhibitors for NSTEMI management who undergo delayed cardiac catheterization.

Targeted Medication Review of Falls-Risk Medications in Older Patients: A Community Pharmacy-Based Approach.

Objective To assess a community pharmacist-provided targeted medication review (TMR) intervention to reduce the number of falls risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs) prescribed to older patients in a community pharmacy setting. Design A single-site, prospective, interventional pilot study with a historical control group. Setting A single independent community pharmacy in rural Western New York. Participants A convenience sample of subjects was recruited for the intervention group based on the following inclusion criteria: 65 years of age or older, at least one prescription filled at the pharmacy within the past 90 days from date of enrollment in study, enrolled in a local Medicare plan, and prescription for at least one prespecified FRID filled at the pharmacy within 90 days before date of enrollment in study. A control group was collected that had different Medicare Part D plans than the intervention group but otherwise met inclusion criteria and ensured that between all of the control-group patients we included at least one patient prescribed each of the FRID classes that were found in the intervention group. Thirty-six subjects completed the study intervention, and 63 controls were collected. This offset in numbers between groups resulted from intervention subjects taking multiple FRIDs and the control needing to take the same class of FRID, thus one intervention subject may have required multiple control subjects to parallel each FRID class. Intervention The intervention involved the community pharmacist assessing the patient's fall risk, then educating the patient on the risks of the FRID he or she was prescribed, and recommending to either replace or discontinue the FRID. The outcomes assessment occurred three months later, with the pharmacist repeating the falls-risk assessment and following up regarding the patient's agreed-upon action plan. Results The intervention group had 52 FRIDs identified while the control group had 89. The discontinuation rate of FRIDs at three months was significantly higher in the intervention group (7.7% versus 0%; P = 0.0172). Conclusion This study demonstrated that a community pharmacist TMR intervention can reduce the use of FRIDs.

Socio-demographic and -economic factors associated with 30-day readmission for conditions targeted by the hospital readmissions reduction program: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Early hospital readmissions remain common in patients with conditions targeted by the CMS Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP). There is still no consensus on whether readmission measures should be adjusted based on social factors, and there are few population studies within the U.S. examining how social characteristics influence readmissions for HRRP-targeted conditions. The objective of this study was to determine if specific socio-demographic and -economic factors are associated with 30-day readmissions in HRRP-targeted conditions: acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, acute myocardial infarction, and heart failure. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify patients admitted with HRRP-targeted conditions between January 1, 2010 and September 30, 2015. Stroke was included as a control condition because it is not included in the HRRP. Multivariate models were used to assess the relationship between three social and economic characteristics (gender, urban/rural hospital designation, and estimated median household income within the patient's zip code) and 30-day readmission rates using a hierarchical two-level logistic model. Age-adjusted models were used to assess relationship differences between Medicare vs. non-Medicare populations. RESULTS: There were 19,253,997 weighted index hospital admissions for all diagnoses and 3,613,488 30-day readmissions between 2010 and 2015. Patients in the lowest income quartile (≤$37,999) had an increased odds of 30-day readmission across all conditions (P < 0.0001). Female gender and rural hospital designation were associated with a decreased odds of 30-day readmission for most targeted conditions (P < 0.05). Similar findings were also seen in patients ≥65 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Socio-demographic and -economic factors are associated with 30-day readmission rates and should be incorporated into tools or interventions to improve discharge planning and mitigate against readmission.

Readmissions and costs among younger and older adults for targeted conditions during the enactment of the hospital readmission reduction program.

BACKGROUND: The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) was introduced to reduce readmission rates among Medicare beneficiaries, however little is known about readmissions and costs for HRRP-targeted conditions in younger populations. The primary objective of this study was to examine readmission trends and costs for targeted conditions during policy implementation among younger and older adults in the U.S. METHODS: We analyzed the Nationwide Readmission Database from January 2010 to September 2015 in younger (18-64 years) and older (≥65 years) patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), pneumonia, and acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Pre- and post-HRRP periods were defined based on implementation of the policy for each condition. Readmission rates were evaluated using an interrupted time series with difference-in-difference analyses and hospital cost differences between early and late readmissions (≤30 vs. > 30 days) were evaluated using generalized linear models. RESULTS: Overall, this study included 16,884,612 hospitalizations with 3,337,266 readmissions among all age groups and 5,977,177 hospitalizations with 1,104,940 readmissions in those aged 18-64 years. Readmission rates decreased in all conditions. In the HRRP announcement period, readmissions declined significantly for those aged 40-64 years for AMI (p < 0.0001) and HF (p = 0.003). Readmissions decreased significantly in the post-HRRP period for those aged 40-64 years at a slower rate for AMI (p = 0.003) and HF (p = 0.05). Readmission rates among younger patients (18-64 years) varied within all four targeted conditions in HRRP announcement and post-HRRP periods. Adjusted models showed a significantly higher readmission cost in those readmitted within 30 days among younger and older populations for AMI (p < 0.0001), HF (p < 0.0001), pneumonia (p < 0.0001), and AECOPD (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Readmissions for targeted conditions decreased in the U.S. during the enactment of the HRRP policy and younger age groups (< 65 years) not targeted by the policy saw a mixed effect. Healthcare expenditures in younger and older populations were significantly higher for early readmissions with all targeted conditions. Further research is necessary evaluating total healthcare utilization including emergency department visits, observation units, and hospital readmissions in order to better understand the extent of the HRRP on U.S. healthcare.

Trends in fall-related mortality and fall risk increasing drugs among older individuals in the United States,1999-2017.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated increasing mortality due to falls among older adults. The objective of this study was to determine whether there was an increase in fall risk increasing drug prescribing and if this is concurrent with an increase in fall-related mortality in persons 65 years and older in the United States. METHODS: The study is a serial cross-sectional analysis utilizing data from both the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) and the medical expenditure panel survey (MEPS) for years 1999-2017. Adults aged 65 years and older were evaluated for death due to falls from the NVSS and for prescription fills of fall risk increasing drugs per the Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries-Rx (STEADI-Rx) fall checklist from the MEPS. RESULTS: The analysis included 374 972 fall-related mortalities and 7 858 177 122 fills of fall risk increasing drugs. 563 037 964 persons age 65 and older received at least one fall risk increasing drug. Age-adjusted mortality due to falls increased from 29.40 per 100 000 in 1999 to 63.27 per 100 000 in 2017. The percent of persons who received at least one prescription for a fall risk increasing drug increased from 57% in 1999 to 94% in 2017 (p for trend <.0001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Both use of fall risk increasing drugs and mortality due to falls are on the rise. Fall risk increasing drugs may partially explain the increase in mortality due to falls; this cannot be firmly concluded from the current study. Future research examining the potential relationship between fall risk increasing drugs and fall-related mortality utilizing nationally representative person-level data are needed.

Knowledge and Attitudes of Student Pharmacists Regarding Polypharmacy and Deprescribing: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Pharmacists play a key role in deprescribing medications. Incorporation of this concept into pharmacy school curricula is important in ensuring that graduates can address the complex needs of an aging population. The aims of this study were to assess if and how student pharmacists were exposed to deprescribing within their curriculum, to assess students' perceptions regarding their attitudes, ability and confidence in deprescribing, and to assess if reported curricular exposure to this topic resulted in improved perceptions or objective knowledge assessment scores. An electronic survey was distributed to third- and fourth-year pharmacy students at 132 schools of pharmacy. The survey included three sections including: (i) demographics and questions on their exposure to deprescribing and other experiences within their curriculum; (ii) questions regarding their attitudes, ability, and confidence regarding deprescribing on a 5-point Likert-scale; (iii) a knowledge assessment on polypharmacy and deprescribing in the form of 12 multiple-choice questions. Likert-scale questions were analyzed as scales utilizing the mean score for items measuring student perceptions regarding deprescribing attitudes, ability, and confidence. Comparisons were made on each variable between students with and without curricular exposure to deprescribing using t-tests. Ninety-one responses were included in the analysis. Only 59.3% of respondents reported exposure to deprescribing in their didactic coursework. The mean scores on the polypharmacy and deprescribing knowledge assessments were 61.0% and 64.5%, respectively. Those with exposure to deprescribing concepts within their curriculum were more likely to agree that their school's curriculum prepared them to deprescribe in clinical practice (t(89) = -2.26, p = 0.03). Pharmacy schools should evaluate their curricula and consider the addition of specific deprescribing objectives and outcome measures for didactic and experiential training.

Student Pharmacist Perceptions of the Utility of a Medication Therapy Management-Based, Medication-Related, Falls Risk-Assessment Tool.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate student pharmacists' perceptions of the Medication Fall Risk-Assessment Tool (MFRAT), a novel medication therapy management (MTM)-based clinical decision support tool.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study
SETTING: One school of pharmacy
PARTICIPANTS: Participants were eligible if they had used the MFRAT as part of a wellness clinic or as part of required coursework prior to April 2016.
INTERVENTIONS: An online, author developed survey was distributed to assess previous MFRAT use, perceptions of the tool on a 5-point Likert-type scale, and qualitative feedback related in the areas of pharmacy workflow, clinical utility, and perceived patient acceptance.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Positive agreement to survey items served as the main outcome measure. A chi-square test was used to test for a difference in positive response between naive and experienced MFRAT users. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency of items in each domain.
RESULTS: Of the 127 potential participants surveyed, 110 completed the survey for an overall response rate of 87%. Greater than 85% of participants found the MFRAT's report clinically useful. Eighty-seven percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the information provided by the tool could easily be understood by patients. The most significant limitation to the use if the MFRAT in existing workflow was time required to enter a patient's medication profile.
CONCLUSION: The MFRAT was viewed positively in terms of clinical utility and perceived patient acceptance. Improvements will need to be made to make using the tool more time efficient in pharmacy MTM workflow.

Opportunities and Recommendations for Improving Medication Safety: Understanding the Medication Management System in Primary Care Through an Abstraction Hierarchy.

BACKGROUND: Despite making great strides in improving the treatment of diseases, the minimization of unintended harm by medication therapy continues to be a major hurdle facing the health care system. Medication error and prescription of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) represent a prevalent source of harm to patients and are associated with increased rates of adverse events, hospitalizations, and increased health care costs. Attempts to improve medication management systems in primary care have had mixed results. Implementation of new interventions is difficult because of complex contextual factors within the health care system. Abstraction hierarchy (AH), the first step in cognitive work analysis (CWA), is used by human factors practitioners to describe complex sociotechnical systems. Although initially intended for the nuclear power domain and interface design, AH has been used successfully to aid the redesign of numerous health care systems such as the design of decision support tools, mobile patient monitoring apps, and a telephone triage system. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to refine our understanding of the primary care office in relation to a patient's medication through the development of an AH. Emphasis was placed on the elements related to medication safety to provide guidance for the design of a safer medication management system in primary care. METHODS: The AH development was guided by the methodology used by seminal CWA literature. It was initially developed by 2 authors and later fine-tuned by an expert panel of clinicians, social scientists, and a human factors engineer. It was subsequently refined until an agreement was reached. A means-ends analysis was performed and described for the nodes of interest. The model represents the primary care office space through functional purposes, values and priorities, function-related purposes, object-related processes, and physical objects. RESULTS: This model depicts the medication management system at various levels of abstraction. The resulting components must be balanced and coordinated to provide medical treatment with limited health care resources. Understanding the physical and informational constraints on activities that occur in a primary care office depicted in the AH defines areas in which medication safety can be improved. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous means-ends relationships were identified and analyzed. These can be further evaluated depending on the specific needs of the user. Recommendations for optimizing a medication management system in a primary care facility were made. Individual practices can use AH for clinical redesign to improve prescribing and deprescribing practices.

Potentially Inappropriate Medications Are Associated with Increased Healthcare Utilization and Costs.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) prescribing and its association with healthcare utilization and related expenditures utilizing nationally representative data from the United States. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The 2011-2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling sample of U.S. adults aged 65 and older during the first round of each MEPS cycle. MEASUREMENTS: A qualified definition operationalized from the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® was used to estimate the prevalence of PIM prescribing over the study period. Negative binomial models were assembled to examine associations between PIM exposure and healthcare utilization including hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and outpatient provider visits. Generalized linear models with the log link function and gamma distribution were used to analyze associations between PIM exposure and healthcare expenditures. Sensitivity analyses were conducted utilizing inverse probability treatment weighting using propensity scores for being prescribed a PIM. RESULTS: The period prevalence of PIM prescribing over the 5-year sample was 34.4%. PIM prescribing was positively associated with hospitalizations (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] = 1.17; 95 confidence interval [CI] = 1.08-1.26; P < .001), ED visits (aIRR = 1.26; 95% CI = 1.17-1.35; P < .001), and outpatient provider visits (aIRR = 1.18; 95% CI = 1.14-1.21; P < .001). PIM exposure was associated with higher marginal costs within outpatient visits ($116; 95% CI = $105-$243; P < .001), prescription medications ($128; 95% CI = $72-$199; P < .001), and total healthcare expenditures ($458; 95% CI = $295-$664; P < .001). Similar results were found in our propensity score analyses. CONCLUSION: PIMs continue to be prescribed at a high rate among older adults in the United States. Our results suggest that receipt of PIMs is associated with higher rates of healthcare utilization and increased costs across the healthcare continuum. Further work is needed to implement evidence-based deprescribing interventions that may in turn reduce unnecessary healthcare utilization.

Antibiotic prescribing in the emergency department versus primary care: Implications for stewardship.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing by drug, dose, duration, and indication between the emergency department (ED) and primary care (PC) within the Veterans Affairs Western New York Healthcare System (VAWNYHCS) to aid in focusing antimicrobial stewardship efforts. DESIGN: In this prospective observational cohort study, patients were identified using electronic alerts at the time of antibiotic prescribing. Prescriptions were retrospectively analyzed for appropriateness of antibiotic indication, drug choice, dose, and duration on the basis of current guideline recommendations. Data were compared between the ED and PC to determine the impact of visit location on prescribing habits. Baseline characteristics were compared using descriptive statistics, and a multivariable analysis was performed to identify statistically significant risk factors for inappropriate prescribing. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients prescribed outpatient antibiotics at the VAWNYHCS ED and PC settings between June 2017 and February 2018. OUTCOME MEASURES: Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing by drug, dose, duration, and indication between the ED and PC settings. RESULTS: The cohort included 1566 antibiotic prescriptions (ED = 488, PC = 1078). The appropriate drug, dose, and duration for antibiotics prescribed in the ED versus PC were 63.1% versus 43.4% (P < 0.001), 88.1% versus 88.2% (P = 0.953), and 86.1% versus 71.1% (P < 0.001), respectively. Azithromycin was the most inappropriately prescribed antibiotic in both the ED (37.8%) and PC (49.0%). Two factors predicted whether patients received the correct antibiotic empirically: location of the visit and antibiotic allergy. Overall, 56.6% of ED prescriptions and 82% of PC prescriptions were inappropriate with respect to at least 1 component. CONCLUSION: Stewardship is needed in both the ED and PC settings. However, initial efforts should be focused on PC because this setting had a statistically significant amount of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Pharmacist-led education and interventions should focus on the determination of drug, duration, and indication for the use of antibiotics.

Implementation of a Pharmacist-Led Transitions of Care Program within a Primary Care Practice: A Two-Phase Pilot Study.

Pharmacists in primary care settings have unique opportunities to address the causes of ineffective care transitions. The objective of this study is to describe the implementation of a multifaceted pharmacist transitions of care (TOC) intervention integrated into a primary care practice and evaluate the effectiveness of the program. This was a two-phase pilot study describing the development, testing, and evaluation of the TOC program. In Phase 1, the TOC intervention was implemented in a general patient population, while Phase 2 focused the intervention on high-risk patients. The two pilot phases were compared to each other (Phase 1 vs. Phase 2) and to a historical control group of patients who received usual care prior to the intervention (Phase 1 and Phase 2 vs. control). The study included 138 patients in the intervention group (Phase 1: 101 and Phase 2: 37) and 118 controls. At baseline, controls had a significantly lower LACE index, shorter length of stay, and a lower number of medications at discharge, indicating less medical complexity. A total of 344 recommendations were provided over both phases, approximately 80% of which were accepted. In adjusted models, there were no significant differences in 30-day all-cause readmissions between Phase 2 and controls (aOR 0.78; 95% CI 0.21-2.89; p = 0.71) or Phase 1 (aOR 0.99; 95% CI 0.30-3.37; p = 0.99). This study successfully implemented a pharmacist-led TOC intervention within a primary care setting using a two-phase pilot design. More robust studies are needed in order to identify TOC interventions that reduce healthcare utilization in a cost-effective manner.

Revefenacin for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive condition characterized by irreversible or incompletely reversible airflow limitation. Long-acting bronchodilators, including ß2 agonists (LABA) and muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), serve as the standard of care for maintenance therapy in COPD. Individualizing therapy to optimize selection of delivery device has the potential to improve medication adherence and clinical outcomes among COPD patients.Areas covered: Revefenacin (Yupelri) is the only LAMA approved for once-daily administration via standard jet nebulizer for the maintenance therapy in patients with COPD. Revefenacin has a unique biphenyl carbamate tertiary amine structure, differing from the quaternary amine structure of previously approved LAMAs. Here we summarize the available clinical data for this new agent and discuss its potential place in the treatment of COPD.Expert opinion: Based on available clinical trial data, revefenacin appears to be an effective and safe option for long-term maintenance therapy of COPD. Revefenacin offers a once-daily option for LAMA therapy for patients who prefer or require nebulized drug delivery. The availability of this agent can allow patients to combine nebulized therapies that could improve clinical outcomes in appropriately selected patients with COPD.