Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Knee ; 23(1): 78-84, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26746039

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To classify patients with patellofemoral (PF) instability on the basis of their mechanical gait characteristics, and to relate gait deficits to patellofemoral congruence. METHODS: Thirteen patients awaiting patellar stabilisation surgery were recruited for gait analysis and magnetic resonance imaging, MRI assessment of PF congruence. Patients were grouped into two subgroups (P1, P2) based on knee joint moment during stance, and their total support moments (TSMs) during stance were compared against eight healthy Control subjects. PF congruence was compared between groups from MRI data captured at 0, 20 and 40° of passive knee flexion and during dynamic extension. RESULTS: Five patients were classified into group P1 because they demonstrated a knee extensor moment during early stance, and eight patients into group P2 because they did not. The TSM of the more affected limb in group P1 was not significantly different from Control values in early stance but the difference was significant (P<.05) in late stance. In group P2, both the less and more affected limbs were significantly different from Control TSM values in early stance, but only the more affected limb in late stance. Patellofemoral contact areas as measured by MRI were greatest for the Control patients, and least for patient group P2 especially during the active extension trials. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with patellofemoral pain and instability walked with a slightly flexed knee, avoiding extension. The MRI measurements of joint contact agreed with the patient groupings according to gait mechanics. Cartilage contact across the PF joint can be an objective measure of instability.


Subject(s)
Gait/physiology , Joint Instability/physiopathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Patellofemoral Joint/physiopathology , Quadriceps Muscle/physiopathology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Walking/physiology , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Female , Humans , Joint Instability/diagnosis , Male , Patellofemoral Joint/diagnostic imaging , Quadriceps Muscle/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult
2.
Shoulder Elbow ; 6(1): 29-34, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27582906

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rupture of the pectoralis major (PM) tendon is a rare but severe injury. Several techniques have been described for PM fixation, including a transosseus technique, placing cortical buttons at the superior, middle and inferior PM tendon insertion points. The present cadaveric study investigates the proximity of the posterior branch of the axillary nerve to the drill positions for transosseus PM tendon repair. METHODS: Twelve cadaveric shoulders were used. The axillary nerve was marked during a preparatory dissection. Drills were passed through the humerus at the superior, middle and inferior insertions of the PM tendon and the drill bits were left in situ. The distance between these and each axillary nerve was measured using computed tomography. RESULTS: The superior drill position was in closest proximity to the axillary nerve (three-dimensional distance range 0-18.01 mm, mean 10.74 mm, 95% confidence interval 7.24 mm to 14.24 mm). The middle PM insertion point was also very close to the nerve. CONCLUSIONS: Caution should be used when performing bicortical drilling of the humerus, especially when drilling at the superior border of the PM insertion. We describe 'safe' and 'danger' zones for the positioning of cortical buttons through the humerus reflecting the risk posed to the axillary nerve.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...