Evaluation of sex differences in the receipt of concomitant atrial fibrillation procedures during nonmitral cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Women are less likely to receive guideline-recommended cardiovascular care, but evaluation of sex-based disparities in cardiac surgical procedures is limited. Receipt of concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) procedures during nonmitral cardiac surgery was compared by sex for patients with preoperative AF. METHODS: Patients with preoperative AF undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or aortic valve replacement at any of the 33 hospitals in Michigan from 2014 to 2022 were included. Patients with prior cardiac surgery, transcatheter AF procedure, or emergency/salvage status were excluded. Hierarchical logistic regression identified predictors of concomitant AF procedures, account for hospital and surgeon as random effects. RESULTS: Of 5460 patients with preoperative AF undergoing nonmitral cardiac surgery, 24% (n = 1291) were women with a mean age of 71 years. Women were more likely to have paroxysmal (vs persistent) AF than men (80% vs 72%; P < .001) and had a higher mean predicted risk of mortality (5% vs 3%; P < .001). The unadjusted rate of concomitant AF procedure was 59% for women and 67% for men (P < .001). After risk adjustment, women had 26% lower adjusted odds of concomitant AF procedure than men (adjusted odds ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.86; P < .001). Female sex was the risk factor associated with the lowest odds of concomitant AF procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Women are less likely to receive guideline recommended concomitant AF procedure during nonmitral surgery. Identification of barriers to concomitant AF procedure in women may improve treatment of AF.

Quality improvement mechanisms to improve lymph node staging for lung cancer: Trends from a statewide database.

OBJECTIVE: Our statewide thoracic quality collaborative has implemented multiple quality improvement initiatives to improve lung cancer nodal staging. We subsequently implemented a value-based reimbursement initiative to further incentivize quality improvement. We compare the impact of these programs to steer future quality improvement initiatives. METHODS: Since 2016, our collaborative focused on improving lymph node staging for lung cancer by leveraging unblinded, hospital-level metrics and collaborative feedback. In 2021, a value-based reimbursement initiative was implemented with statewide yearly benchmark rates for (1) preoperative mediastinal staging for ≥T2N0 lung cancer, and (2) sampling ≥5 lymph node stations. Participating surgeons would receive additional reimbursement if either benchmark was met. We reviewed patients from January 2015 to March 2023 at the 21 participating hospitals to determine the differential effects on quality improvement. RESULTS: We analyzed 6228 patients. In 2015, 212 (39%) patients had ≥5 nodal stations sampled, and 99 (51%) patients had appropriate preoperative mediastinal staging. During 2016 to 2020, this increased to 2253 (62%) patients and 739 (56%) patients, respectively. After 2020, 1602 (77%) patients had ≥5 nodal stations sampled, and 403 (73%) patients had appropriate preoperative mediastinal staging. Interrupted time-series analysis demonstrated significant increases in adequate nodal sampling and mediastinal staging before value-based reimbursement. Afterward, preoperative mediastinal staging rates briefly dropped but significantly increased while nodal sampling did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative quality improvement made significant progress before value-based reimbursement, which reinforces the effectiveness of leveraging unblinded data to a collaborative group of thoracic surgeons. Value-based reimbursement may still play a role within a quality collaborative to maintain infrastructure and incentivize participation.

Lessons learned from the EACTS-MSTCVS quality fellowship: a call to action for continuous improvement of cardiothoracic surgery outcomes in Europe.

The Michigan Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons (MSTCVS), a pioneer in initiating and nurturing quality improvement strategies in statewide cardiothoracic surgery, has been running the Quality Collaborative (MSTCVS-QC) program since 2001. This initiative has significantly grown over the years, facilitating at least 4 in-person meetings annually. It actively engages cardiac and general thoracic surgeons, data managers and researchers from all 32 non-federally funded cardiothoracic surgery sites across Michigan. Broadening its influence on joint learning and clinical outcomes, the MSTCVS-QC formed a strategic partnership with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, the state's largest private insurer, to further promote its initiatives. The MSTCVS-QC, operating from a dedicated QC centre employs an STS-associated database with additional aspects for data collection and analysis. The QC centre also organizes audits, facilitates collaborative meetings, disseminates surgical outcomes and champions the development and implementation of quality improvement initiatives related to cardiothoracic surgery in Michigan. Recognizing the MSTCVS-QC's successful efforts in advancing quality improvement, the European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery (EACTS) introduced a fellowship program in 2018, facilitated through the EACTS Francis Fontan Fund (FFF). This program allows early-career academic physicians to spend 4-6 months with the MSTCVS-QC team in Ann Arbor. This article chronicles the evolution and functionality of the MSTCVS-QC, enriched by the experiences of the inaugural 4 EACTS/FFF fellows. Our objective is to emphasize the critical importance of fostering a culture of quality improvement and patient safety in the field of cardiothoracic surgery with open discussion of audited, high-quality data points. This principle, while implemented locally, has implications and value extending far beyond Europe, resonating globally.

Evidence-based opioid prescribing guidelines after lung resection: a prospective, multicenter analysis.

Background: Opioid prescribing guidelines have significantly decreased overprescribing and post-discharge use after cardiac surgery; however, limited recommendations exist for general thoracic surgery patients, a similarly high-risk population. We examined opioid prescribing and patient-reported use to develop evidence-based, opioid prescribing guidelines after lung cancer resection. Methods: This prospective, statewide, quality improvement study was conducted between January 2020 to March 2021 and included patients undergoing surgical resection of a primary lung cancer across 11 institutions. Patient-reported outcomes at 1-month follow-up were linked with clinical data and Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) database records to characterize prescribing patterns and post-discharge use. The primary outcome was quantity of opioid used after discharge; secondary outcomes included quantity of opioid prescribed at discharge and patient-reported pain scores. Opioid quantities are reported in number of 5-mg oxycodone tablets (mean ± standard deviation). Results: Of the 602 patients identified, 429 met inclusion criteria. Questionnaire response rate was 65.0%. At discharge, 83.4% of patients were provided a prescription for opioids of mean size 20.5±13.1 pills, while patients reported using 8.2±13.0 pills after discharge (P<0.001), including 43.7% who used none. Those not taking opioids on the calendar day prior to discharge (32.4%) used fewer pills (4.4±8.1 vs. 11.7±14.9, P<0.001). Refill rate was 21.5% for patients provided a prescription at discharge, while 12.5% of patients not prescribed opioids at discharge required a new prescription before follow-up. Pain scores were 2.4±2.5 for incision site and 3.0±2.8 for overall pain (scale 0-10). Conclusions: Patient-reported post-discharge opioid use, surgical approach, and in-hospital opioid use before discharge should be used to inform prescribing recommendations after lung resection.

Barriers to atrial fibrillation ablation during mitral valve surgery.

BACKGROUND: Nearly 40% of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing mitral valve surgery do not receive concomitant ablation despite societal guidelines. We assessed barriers to implementation of this evidence-based practice through a survey of cardiac surgeons in 2 statewide quality collaboratives. METHODS: Adult cardiac surgeons across 2 statewide collaboratives were surveyed on their knowledge and practice regarding AF ablation. Questions concerning experience, clinical practice, case scenarios, and barriers to implementation were included. RESULTS: Among 66 respondents (66 of 135; 48.9%), the majority reported "very comfortable/frequently use" cryoablation (53 of 66; 80.3%) and radiofrequency (55 of 66; 83.3%). Only 12.1% (8/66) were not aware of the recommendations. Approximately one-half of the respondents reported learning AF ablation in fellowship (50.0%; 33 of 66) or attending courses (47.0%; 31 of 66). Responses to clinical scenarios demonstrated wide variability in practice patterns. One-half of the respondents reported no barriers; others cited increased cross-clamp time, excessive patient risk, and arrhythmia incidence as obstacles. Desired interventions included cardiology/electrophysiology support, protocols, pacemaker rate information, and education in the form of site visits, videos and proctors. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of evidence-based recommendations and practice patterns vary widely. These data identify several barriers to implementation of concomitant AF ablation and suggest specific interventions (mentorship/support, protocols, research, and education) to overcome these barriers.

Adequate lung cancer surgery lymphadenectomy within a statewide quality collaborative: Quality improvement in action.

OBJECTIVES: In January 2016, our statewide quality improvement collaborative focused on 3 metrics of adequate lymph node harvest during lung cancer surgery: (1) rates of pathologic examination of 10 lymph nodes or more; (2) sampling 5 or more lymph node stations or more within the hilum or mediastinum; and (3) pathologic nodal upstaging (pathologic nodal stage higher than clinical nodal stage). Unblinded, hospital-level outcomes were presented at biannual meetings, and opportunities for education or improvement were discussed. We set out to describe this quality improvement initiative and the subsequent impact on surgical lymphadenectomies statewide. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing lobectomy for stage IA to IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer from July 2015 to December 2020 at the 16 participating centers. RESULTS: The study cohort included 3753 patients. The rates of examining 10 lymph nodes or more statewide increased from 215 lobectomies (44.0%) in 2015 to 522 lobectomies (78.9%) in 2020 (P < .001). Similar trends were noted statewide for 5 lymph node stations or more, which increased from 193 lobectomies (39.6%) to 531 lobectomies (80.3%) in 2020 (P < .001). The overall rate of nodal upstaging was more variable year to year and generally declined over time (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Our statewide quality improvement initiative improved rates of appropriate lymph node staging for surgically treated non-small cell lung cancer compared with national rates. This work demonstrates the power that a "community of practice" philosophy can have on surgical treatment of lung cancer. Quality improvement interventions including transparent data-driven discussions and collaboration can help guide future quality improvement initiatives and should be readily transferrable to other clinical domains.

The Effect of Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Outcomes After Urgent or Emergent Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety of performing urgent or emergent cardiac surgery within 5 days of a patient taking a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). DESIGN: A multicenter retrospective registry study. SETTING: Thirty-three hospitals in a quality collaborative from 2017 to 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were included if they underwent urgent or emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Patients were excluded if they received any anticoagulant or antiplatelet agent besides DOACs, heparin, or aspirin. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were stratified based upon the receipt of a DOAC within 5 days of their surgery. Patient cohorts included DOAC within 2 days, DOAC within 3-to-5 days, and no anticoagulation. Data were unavailable on the specific DOAC agent taken prior to admission. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 7,201 patients included, with 94 on DOACs. Intraoperative blood transfusion was required in 23.9% of patients on no anticoagulant, 26.2% on a DOAC within 3-to-5 days of surgery (odds ratio [OR] 0.98; 95% CI 0.46-2.11), and 30.3% on a DOAC within 2 days (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.37-2.67). Five or more intraoperative blood products were required in 4.4% on no anticoagulant, 1.7% on DOAC within 3-to-5 days (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.04-2.71), and 6.1% on DOAC within 2 days (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.06-4.05). No difference in mortality was observed among the 3 groups (2.9% v 3.3% v 3.0%; p = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: For urgent or emergent CABGs, no significant differences in minor bleeding, major bleeding, or mortality were observed in patients taking a DOAC within 5 days of surgery. This study was hypothesis-generating for performing urgent or emergent surgery sooner than 5 days after holding DOACs.

Area Deprivation and Medicare Spending for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Insights From Michigan.

BACKGROUND: Prior work has established that high socioeconomic deprivation is associated with worse short- and long-term outcomes for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The relationship between socioeconomic status and 90-day episode spending is poorly understood. In this observational cohort analysis, we evaluated whether socioeconomically disadvantaged patients were associated with higher expenditures during 90-day episodes of care after isolated CABG. METHODS: We linked clinical registry data from 8728 isolated CABG procedures from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2018, to Medicare fee-for-service claims data. Our primary exposure variable was patients in the top decile of the Area Deprivation Index. Linear regression was used to compare risk-adjusted, price-standardized 90-day episode spending for deprived against nondeprived patients as well as component spending categories: index hospitalization, professional services, post acute care, and readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 872 patients were categorized as being in the top decile. Mean 90-day episode spending for the 8728 patients in the sample was $55 258 (SD, $26 252). Socioeconomically deprived patients had higher overall 90-day spending compared with nondeprived patients ($61 579 vs $54 557; difference, $3003; P = .001). Spending was higher in socioeconomically deprived patients for index hospitalizations (difference, $1284; P = .005), professional services (difference, $379; P = .002), and readmissions (difference, $1188; P = .008). Inpatient rehabilitation was the only significant difference in post-acute care spending (difference, $469; P = .011). CONCLUSIONS: Medicare spending was higher for socioeconomically deprived CABG in Michigan, indicating systemic disparities over and above patient demographic factors.

High Socioeconomic Deprivation and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Outcomes: Insights From Michigan.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular outcomes are worse among individuals from areas with limited socioeconomic resources. This study evaluated the relationship between high socioeconomic deprivation and isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) outcomes. METHODS: We linked statewide Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database data to Medicare Fee-for-Service records for 10 423 Michigan residents undergoing isolated CABG between January 2012 and December 2018. High socioeconomic deprivation was defined as residing in the highest decile of the ZIP Code-level area deprivation index (ADI). Multivariable logistic regression estimated the relationship between top ADI decile and major morbidity, in-hospital mortality, and operative mortality. Survival analyses evaluated long-term survival comparing patients in the top vs not in the top ADI decile. RESULTS: A total of 1036 patients were in the top decile of ADI (ADI >82.4), and they were more likely to be female, Black, and have a higher predicted risk of mortality. Patients in the top ADI decile had significantly higher rates of major morbidity (17.4% vs 11.4%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.04-1.54; P = .021) and in-hospital mortality (3.2% vs 1.3%, adjusted odds ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.18-2.86, P = .007) but not operative mortality. The adjusted hazard of mortality was 16% higher for patients residing in the top ADI decile (95% CI, 1.01-1.33; P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: Isolated CABG patients residing in the highest areas of socioeconomic deprivation differed with respect to demographic and clinical characteristics and experienced worse short- and long-term outcomes compared with those not in the top ADI decile.

Predictors of Discharge Home Without Opioids After Cardiac Surgery: A Multicenter Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Whether all patients will require an opioid prescription after cardiac surgery is unknown. We performed a multicenter analysis to identify patient predictors of not receiving an opioid prescription at the time of discharge home after cardiac surgery. METHODS: Opioid-naïve patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve surgery through a sternotomy at 10 centers from January to December 2019 were identified retrospectively from a prospectively maintained data set. Opioid-naïve was defined as not taking opioids at the time of admission. The primary outcome was discharge without an opioid prescription. Mixed-effects logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of discharge without an opioid prescription, and postdischarge opioid prescribing was monitored to assess patient tolerance of discharge without an opioid prescription. RESULTS: Among 1924 eligible opioid-naïve patients, mean age was 64 ± 11 years, and 25% were women. In total, 28% of all patients were discharged without an opioid prescription. On multivariable analysis, older age, longer length of hospital stay, and undergoing surgery during the last 3 months of the study were independent predictors of discharge without an opioid prescription, whereas depression, non-Black and non-White race, and using more opioid pills on the day before discharge were independent predictors of receiving an opioid prescription. Among patients discharged without an opioid prescription, 1.8% (10 of 547) were subsequently prescribed an opioid. CONCLUSIONS: Discharging select patients without an opioid prescription after cardiac surgery appears well tolerated, with a low incidence of postdischarge opioid prescriptions. Increasing the number of patients discharged without an opioid prescription may be an area for quality improvement.

The influence of tobacco load versus smoking status on outcomes following lobectomy for lung cancer in a statewide quality collaborative.

BACKGROUND: Collaborative quality consortia can facilitate implementation of quality measures arising from clinical databases. Our statewide general thoracic surgery (GTS) collaborative investigated the influences of cigarette smoking status on mortality and major morbidity following lobectomy for lung cancer. METHODS: Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database records were identified from 14 institutions participating in a statewide thoracic surgical quality collaborative between 2012 and 2017. We excluded patients with nonelective procedures, stage 0 tumors, American Society of Anesthesiologists class VI disease, and missing clinical characteristics. Outcomes analysis included the combined mortality and major postoperative morbidity rates and the influence of patient characteristics, including smoking status, on composite rate and on postoperative complications. RESULTS: The study cohort included 2267 patient records for analysis. Overall combined mortality and major morbidity rate was 10.2% (n = 231). Postoperative 30-day mortality was 1.5%, and major morbidity 9.6%. Significant predictors of the combined outcome included male sex (P = .004), body mass index (P < .001), Zubrod score (P = .02), smoking pack-years (P = .03), and thoracotomy (P < .001). Higher American Society of Anesthesiologists disease class and advanced tumor stage were marginally associated with worse combined outcome (P = .06). Smoking status; that is, current, past (no smoking within 30 days), or never smoked, was not associated with worse combined outcome (P = .56) and had no significant influence on major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking status was not associated with worse outcomes; however, smoking dose (pack-years) was associated with worse combined mortality and major morbidity. A statewide quality collaborative provides constructive feedback for participating institutions and surgeons, promoting quality improvement in perioperative patient care strategies and improved outcomes.

Establishment and Implementation of Evidence-Based Opioid Prescribing Guidelines in Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Despite the risk of new persistent opioid use after cardiac surgery, postdischarge opioid use has not been quantified and evidence-based prescribing guidelines have not been established. METHODS: Opioid-naive patients undergoing primary cardiac surgery via median sternotomy between January and December 2019 at 10 hospitals participating in a statewide collaborative were selected. Clinical data were linked to patient-reported outcomes collected at 30-day follow-up. An opioid prescribing recommendation stratified by inpatient opioid use on the day before discharge (0, 1-3, or ≥4 pills) was implemented in July 2019. Interrupted time-series analyses were performed for prescription size and postdischarge opioid use before (January to June) and after (July to December) guideline implementation. RESULTS: Among 1495 patients (729 prerecommendation and 766 postrecommendation), median prescription size decreased from 20 pills to 12 pills after recommendation release (P < .001), while opioid use decreased from 3 pills to 0 pills (P < .001). Change in prescription size over time was +0.6 pill/month before and -0.8 pill/month after the recommendation (difference = -1.4 pills/month; P = .036). Change in patient use was +0.6 pill/month before and -0.4 pill/month after the recommendation (difference = -1.0 pills/month; P = .017). Pain levels during the first week after surgery and refills were unchanged. Patients using 0 pills before discharge (n = 710) were prescribed a median of 0 pills and used 0 pills, while those using 1 to 3 pills (n = 536) were prescribed 20 pills and used 7 pills, and those using greater than or equal to 4 pills (n = 249) were prescribed 32 pills and used 24 pills. CONCLUSIONS: An opioid prescribing recommendation was effective, and prescribing after cardiac surgery should be guided by inpatient use.

Evolving trends in aortic valve replacement: A statewide experience.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for the treatment of aortic stenosis in patients at intermediate, high, and extreme risk for mortality from SAVR. We examined recent trends in aortic valve replacement (AVR) in Michigan. METHODS: The Michigan Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons Quality Collaborative (MSTCVS-QC) database was used to determine the number of SAVR and TAVR cases performed from January 2012 through June 2017. Patients were divided into low, intermediate, high, and extreme risk groups based on STS predicted risk of mortality (PROM). TAVR patients in the MSTCVS-QC database were also matched with those in the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry to determine their Heart Team-designated risk category. RESULTS: During the study period 9517 SAVR and 4470 TAVR cases were performed. Total annual AVR volume increased by 40.0% (from 2086 to 2920), with a 13.3% decrease in number of SAVR cases (from 1892 to 1640) and a 560% increase in number of TAVR cases (from 194 to 1280). Greater than 90% of SAVR patients had PROM ≤8%. While >70% of TAVR patients had PROM ≤ 8%, they were mostly designated as high or extreme risk by a Heart Team. CONCLUSIONS: During the study period, SAVR volume gradually declined and TAVR volume dramatically increased. This was mostly due to a new group of patients with lower STS PROM who were designated as higher risk by a Heart Team due to characteristics not completely captured by the STS PROM score.