Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Air Med J ; 32(6): 329-33, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24182881

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Women in labor or with complications of pregnancy in the remote, outback region of Australia's Northern Territory are transported to the hospital by air. The objective of this study was to describe the interventions required by obstetric and newborn patients during air medical transport and to evaluate how often these were beyond the scope of practice of a team consisting of an experienced midwife with or without a general flight doctor. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of 200 consecutive women between 20 weeks gestation up to 24 hours postpartum and newborns transferred during the same time period. RESULTS: Only 1 obstetric patient required intervention beyond the scope of a midwife. Forty-eight newborn infants were transferred. Eleven (23%) required interventions within the skill range of a general flight doctor. Twenty (42%) required neonatal specialist care. Ten of 31 newborns requiring more than midwifery care were referred for transport while in utero. CONCLUSIONS: In this specific cohort, a midwife provided an appropriate level of maternal care to the majority of patients. Newborns frequently required clinical expertise beyond the practice scope of a midwife and general flight doctor. Most women in labor do not deliver during transport. The transport service has finite economic resources and logistical constraints. This study highlighted an ongoing challenge regarding when to request additional neonatal specialist care for preterm or high-risk patients referred for transport in utero.


Subject(s)
Air Ambulances , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Midwifery , Northern Territory , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Retrospective Studies
2.
Med J Aust ; 197(4): 233-7, 2012 Aug 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22900875

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in mechanism and outcome of major traumatic injury in adults since the implementation of the New South Wales trauma monitoring program, and to identify factors associated with mortality. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective review of NSW Trauma Registry data from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2007, including patient demographics, year of injury, and level of trauma centre where definitive treatment was provided. PARTICIPANTS: 9769 people aged ≥ 15 years hospitalised for trauma, with an injury severity score (ISS) > 15. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The NSW Trauma Registry outcome measures included were overall hospital length of stay, length of stay in an intensive care unit and in ospital mortality. RESULTS: There was a decreasing trend in severe trauma presentations in the age group 16-34 years, and an increasing trend in presentations of older people, particularly those aged ≥ 75 years. Road trauma and falls were consistently the commonest injury mechanisms. There were 1328 inhospital deaths (13.6%). Year of injury, level of trauma centre, ISS, head/neck injury and age were all independent predictors of mortality. The odds of mortality was significantly higher among patients receiving definitive care at regional trauma centres compared with Level I centres (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.10-1.63). CONCLUSIONS: Deaths from major trauma in NSW trauma centres have declined since 2003, and definitive care at a Level 1 trauma centre was associated with a survival benefit. More comprehensive trauma data collection with timely analysis will improve injury surveillance and better inform health policy in NSW.


Subject(s)
Wounds and Injuries/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , New South Wales/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Patient Transfer/statistics & numerical data , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Trauma Centers/standards , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/etiology , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Young Adult
3.
Crit Care Resusc ; 12(3): 156-61, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21261572

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of after-hours discharges of patients from the intensive care unit and its effect on in-hospital mortality. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational cohort study conducted in the ICU of Westmead Hospital, a tertiary care teaching hospital in Sydney. All adult patients admitted to the ICU between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2006 were included in the study cohort. Patients were grouped into two categories based on the time of discharge from the ICU: during work hours (08:00-17:59 hours) or after-hours (18:00-07:59 hours). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mortality after discharge from the ICU according to time of discharge. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 2300 patients accounted for 2451 admission episodes during the study period. There were 151 readmissions, involving 133 patients (5.8%). Excluded from the study cohort were 36 patients (1.6%) who were discharged home, 39 (1.7%) who were transferred to other hospitals, and 354 (15.4%) who died during their first stay in the ICU. Data on the remaining 1871 patients who were discharged alive at the end of their first ICU admission were included in our analysis. Of these patients, 1221 (65.3%) were discharged from the ICU during work-hours and 650 (34.7%) after-hours. Crude mortality for patients discharged after-hours was 13.7%, compared with 10.1% for those discharged during work hours. After adjustment for age, APACHE II score and discharge destination, the risk of mortality among patients discharged after-hours was statistically significant (adjusted odds ratio, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.01-1.88]; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of patients (34.7%) were discharged from the ICU after-hours. Discharge after-hours was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality than discharge during work hours.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Patient Discharge , Cohort Studies , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...