Maternal Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavioral Intention after Exposure to Injury Prevention Recommendations in the News Media.

INTRODUCTION: Injury prevention recommendations are frequently presented in the media. Parental understanding and response to these recommendations remain uninvestigated. METHODS: A nationally representative sample of 1,081 mothers completed a cross-sectional survey measuring knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intention after watching/reading video news stories and print articles on two child safety topics. RESULTS: Of the 1,081 respondents, 33% reported hearing little about injury prevention in the media in the past 30 days, and 32% reported never hearing about injury prevention. Nearly one-half (46%) reported the injury prevention studies they had previously read or heard about in the media were confusing to them at least some of the time. The proportion of mothers who recalled the correct key statistic presented in the story varied by safety topic and medium in which the story was presented. A greater proportion of mothers correctly recalled information from the story narrative than the statistics. Mothers also rated the most interesting part of the story differently based on safety topic and medium. A small proportion were not planning to follow the safety recommendations after viewing the news story. CONCLUSIONS: There are gaps in making injury news stories understandable and memorable for mothers in order to encourage behavioral change.

Bicycle-related injuries among children treated in US emergency departments, 2006-2015.

OBJECTIVE: One of the leading causes of non-fatal injury among children is bicycling. Past studies indicate that helmets are protective against bicycle-related injuries and involvement of motor vehicles is associated with severe injuries, but research utilizing a nationally representative data set for this population and focusing on these risk factors does not exist. The objective of this study was to describe the epidemiology of bicycle-related injuries among children treated in hospital emergency departments (EDs) in the United States (US). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted with data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System for children 5-17 years of age who were treated in US EDs from 2006 through 2015 for a bicycle-related injury. Helmet use and motor vehicle involvement were two variables that were created and coded using keyword searches of the case narratives. Rates of injuries over time were described. Multivariate logistic regression along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to contrast types of injuries sustained among injured helmet users with non-users. RESULTS: An estimated 2 219 742 (95% CI: 1 871 120-2 568 363) children 5-17 years of age were treated in US EDs for bicycle-related injuries over the 10-year study period, an average of 608 injuries per day. Most injuries (45.7%) involved children 10-14 years of age. The rate of bicycle-related injuries significantly decreased from 447.4 per 100 000 children in 2006 to 321.1 per 100 000 children in 2015 (P < 0.001). Helmet use at the time of injury was significantly associated with lower likelihood of head and neck injuries (OR: 0.52 [95% CI: 0.40-0.59]) and hospitalizations (OR: 0.71 [95% CI: 0.54-0.94]), but there was no significant change in the rate of injury among helmet users over the study period (P = 0.224). Motor vehicle involvement increased the odds of bicycle-related traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) (OR: 1.98 [95% CI: 1.49-2.64]) as well as injury-related hospitalizations (OR: 4.04 [95% CI: 3.33-4.89]). CONCLUSIONS: Despite decreasing injury rates, bicycling remains an important source of injury for children. Helmet use has demonstrated significant protective effects for TBIs, head and neck injuries, and hospitalizations. Motor vehicle involvement increased the risk of hospitalization. More efforts are needed to promote use of helmets and to reduce the possibility of bicycle-motor vehicle collisions to prevent bicycle-related injuries among children.

A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the Make Safe Happen® app-a mobile technology-based safety behavior change intervention for increasing parents' safety knowledge and actions.

BACKGROUND: Many unintentional injuries that occur in and around the home can be prevented through the use of safety equipment and by consistently following existing safety recommendations. Unfortunately, uptake of these safety behaviors is unacceptably low. This paper describes the design of the Make Safe Happen® smartphone application evaluation study, which aims to evaluate a mobile technology-based safety behavior change intervention on parents' safety knowledge and actions. METHODS: Make Safe Happen® app evaluation study is a randomized controlled trial. Participants will be parents of children aged 0-12 years who are recruited from national consumer online survey panels. Parents will complete a pretest survey, and will be randomized to receive the Make Safe Happen® app or a non-injury-related app, and then complete a posttest follow-up survey after 1 week. Primary outcomes are: (1) safety knowledge; (2) safety behaviors; (3) safety device acquisition and use, and (4) behavioral intention to take safety actions. RESULTS: Anticipated study results are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Wide-reaching interventions, to reach substantial parent and caregiver audiences, to effectively reduce childhood injuries are needed. This study will contribute to the evidence-base about how to increase safety knowledge and actions to prevent home-related injuries in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02751203 ; Pre-results.

Strategies for reducing cancer incidence and mortality in African American and Arab American and Chaldean communities in the Detroit metropolitan area.

OBJECTIVES: We studied the feasibility of implementing a community-based participatory process (CBPP) that addressed cancer education, prevention, and screening in 2 ethnic minority populations by evaluating the improvement in rates of cancer screening compared with historical benchmarks. METHODS: From 2003 to 2009, 2281 community members participated in CBPPs conducted by the Beaumont Cancer Institute in cooperation with the Arab American and Chaldean (AAC) Council, the National Cancer Institute, and the American Cancer Society. The study population consisted of 1067 individuals who completed a postcancer forum survey: 642 from the African American (AA) and 425 from the AAC forums. Data were collected on participants' screening history and participation in subsequent screening tests after the previous year's CBPP. RESULTS: Following attendance of at least one cancer forum the previous year, 329 (30.8%) of the 1067 participant respondents underwent some type of cancer screening, 32% in the AA forums and 28.9% in the AAC forums. Compared with published controls, the CBPPs led to a 38.6% increase in mammographic screening and a 28.7% increase in prostate-specific antigen screening; the AA cohort had 39.7% and 28.4% increases whereas the AAC cohort had 36.3% and 28.9% increases in mammographic and prostate-specific antigen screening, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that implementing CBPPs are feasible in underscreened ethnic minority populations. Further studies need to be performed to determine the absolute benefit of CBPPs compared with baseline levels of screening within these ethnic minority populations.

Physician dispensing: an old idea is new again.

Faced with declining reimbursement for infusional therapies, an oncology practice turned to physician dispensing to offset the loss. Its leaders quickly discovered that the dispensing-vendor landscape was limited, and few guidelines existed for product line development. Yet the approach offers a competitive response to the changing health care landscape. With physician-dispensing prescription costs 50 percent below the national average and generic substitution 50 percent higher than the national average, the potential cost savings for payers and consumers is staggering.